1 / 17

Session 4

Session 4. Transitioning to IMS Via Your SIP-Based Network. Agenda. Overview of a typical pre-IMS Architecture Review of the IP MultiMedia Subsystem framework The IMS Architecture Transitioning to an IMS Architecture Key Factors in a Transition Project. Introduction.

Download Presentation

Session 4

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Session 4 Transitioning to IMS Via Your SIP-Based Network

  2. Agenda • Overview of a typical pre-IMS Architecture • Review of the IP MultiMedia Subsystem framework • The IMS Architecture • Transitioning to an IMS Architecture • Key Factors in a Transition Project

  3. Introduction • The IMS architecture is receiving increased interest in the industry • The challenge is that the full IMS architecture, while providing exceptional flexibility, is very complex • By understanding at a high level the IMS components and their functions, the service provider is able to plan a migration path to an IMS architecture • Realistic transition plan that meets the corporate goals • Plan that maintains the flexibility but minimizes the complexity

  4. Application Processing Database Network Interface Typical Pre-IMS Architecture Enhanced Services System Characteristics • Single vendor supplier system • Mix of vendor-developed and third-party components • Tightly coupled components • No interoperability standards • Proprietary interfaces between components • System can deliver only one service • Stove-piped architecture • Enhancements expensive (if even possible) • Enhancements may require new hardware • Lengthy testing and qualification for geographic markets • Safety • Network compliance

  5. Impact on the Service Provider • Positive • Availability of industry-hardened solutions • Conferencing, voicemail, RBT, video conferencing • Negative • Expensive infrastructure • Barrier to new service offerings • Vendor lock-in • Expensive to change • “Slow” vendor introduction of enhancements • Simultaneous availability = no competitive advantage • “Slow” roll-out of new services • Detailed design and concept testing • Difficult to re-use the solution capabilities for new services

  6. IMS Framework • IP Multimedia Subsystem Goals • Common architecture to support enhanced services • Disaggregated architecture supporting multi-vendor ecosystems • Subscriber network agnostic • Based on standards • IP and SIP • Standard interfaces • IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) Architecture • Developed by the Third Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) with subsequent involvement by: • IETF, ETSI, 3GPP2, CableLabs • Started in the mobile world, moved to fixed line • Standards are still evolving

  7. IMS Architecture

  8. SCIM S-CSCF HSS/HLR I-CSCF BGCF P-CSCF MGCF MRFP MGW IMS – A Simplified View Application Servers Key Elements: • AS – Application Server • SCIM - Service Capability Interaction Manager • MRFC - Multimedia Resource Function Controller • MRFP - Multimedia Resource Function Processor • MRF – Media Resource Function • CSCF- Call Session Control Function • BGCF - Breakout Gateway Control Function • MGCF - Media Gateway Control Function • MGW - Media Gateway • HSS - Home Subscription Server • HLR - Home Location Register SIP SIP MRFC CSCF RTP MRF PSTN

  9. Unified Messaging Announcements Video Mail VideoConferencing IPCall Center Pre-Paid Voice Mail Conferencing Video Ringback Gaming Win Media mp3 Text IMS – Further Simplified SIP PLMN SIP Routing Cloud S-CSCF Web Content PSTN SIPSIP w/ VoiceXML SIP w/ MSCML MPEG-4 HTTP, FTP, NFS RTP Cable Network Storage MRF

  10. IMS - Impact on the Service Provider • Negative • Complex architecture • Requires consideration of interface standards • Requires careful interop testing • Challenge of managing multiple vendors • Positive • Faster development and deployment of enhanced services • Ability to more easily develop services to result in a competitive advantage • Flexibility of vendor choice • IMS provides a migration path (not all or nothing)

  11. Transition to an IMS Architecture • It is possible for a service provider to “get their feet wet” • Initial step is to consider the project goals • Multiple apps on the same infrastructure • Faster service development • Support of network types • Determine elements required • Typical minimum elements • Application/application server • HSS/HLR or database • Media Resource Function or media server • Media Gateway • CSCF or proxy

  12. Database MRF MGW Media Data Transition – Minimum Elements Application Key Considerations: • Lowest cost fully functional option • Good for basic interop testing • Requires app developer to know VXML or MSCML • Standard apps like Voicemail or Conferencing • Database used to store scripts, prompts, and user data SIP VXML MSCML SIP RTP PSTN

  13. Proxy Database MRF MGW Media Data Transition – Another Step Diverse Applications on Application Servers Key Considerations: • Higher cost option • Good for interop testing and data traffic load testing • App developer can use the app server service creation environment • More complex apps with multiple script fetches PSTN

  14. Proxy Database MRF MRF MRF MGW Media Data Transition – An Additional Step Diverse Applications on Application Servers Key Considerations: • Higher cost option • Good for interop testing, data traffic load testing, media traffic load testing • App developer can use the app server service creation environment and load balancing capabilities • More complex apps with multiple script fetches and larger customer groups PSTN

  15. Key Factors in a Transition Project • Match the transition project goals to the company’s business goals • Plan realistic steps • Don’t overextend • Maintain flexibility • If one approach doesn’t work, what other approaches are possible • When in doubt, leverage the experiences of others • Vendors and Partners

  16. Wrap-up Q & A / Quiz

More Related