1 / 29

QS Get-It-Right! Seminar

QS STARS. QS Get-It-Right! Seminar. An insight into quality and global advancement. Baerbel Eckelmann Senior Research Manager. WHAT – QS stars system. QS Stars system: evaluates universities against a range of important performance indicators based on a rating method

danielle-garcia
Download Presentation

QS Get-It-Right! Seminar

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QS STARS QS Get-It-Right! Seminar An insight into quality and global advancement Baerbel EckelmannSenior Research Manager

  2. WHAT – QS stars system • QS Stars system: • evaluates universities against a range of • important performance indicators • based on a rating method • awards stars to an institution, based on • a range of criteria

  3. QS Star Ratings Rankings Benchmarking Star Ratings Advisory Bespoke Projects Market Reports Recruitment Targeting Custom Surveys

  4. WHY we at QS Limitations of rankings • Specialist strength often overlooked • Dependent on reliable collection of data for ALL institutions • International studies tend to focus strongly on research

  5. Ratings vs. Rankings • Ratings are not dependent on the performance of other institutions • Performance measured against preset thresholds • The evaluation of each participating institution can be more thorough • Ratings can be more adaptive • Contextual differences • Recognition of specialties • Ratings can include components not easily included in rankings

  6. Best of both • Working together... • A rating can provide some context to ranking results • A rating can visually signal additional complexity beneath the ranking results • A rating can encourage users/readers to accept that ranking results ought to be understood rather than simply accepted • A rating can provide additional important, yet easily consumable, information to be involved earlier in any decision making process that might involve rankings

  7. WHY you • Allows you to shine where rankings would usually disadvantage (specialized areas of excellence) • Broader range of criteria • Flexible approach in scoring • Benefits institutions where English is not first language • Intermediate profile on website • Opportunity to gain official recognition without being in rankings

  8. Our approach • Involve factors and measures not easily included in rankings • Recognise the strengths of specialist institutions • Design a display format that can be used in combination with ranking results or as a standalone

  9. QS Star Ratings World Rank 241 QS Stars evaluate universities against a range of important performance indicators. For a detailed explanation of the measures and how the University of Milton Keynes achieved its TWO stars, click here. Ranking positions are drawn from the Times Higher Education – QS.com World University Rankings. less more LAYOUT SUGGESTION

  10. QS Star Ratings

  11. HOW - methodology • Evaluation measures • Must be... • Practical to collect • Appropriate to the aspect measured • Adaptable to context • Measurable against a threshold • Logical and transparent

  12. QS Stars system

  13. 1. Research Quality

  14. 2. Graduate employability

  15. 3. Teaching Quality

  16. 4. Infrastructure – QS Audit

  17. Infrastructure – QS Audit

  18. Infrastructure – QS Audit

  19. Online database examples 4.1 5.4

  20. Online database examples 4.2 – 4.6

  21. Online database examples Core Criteria

  22. 5. Internationalisation

  23. 5. Internationalisation

  24. 6. Innovation & Knowledge Transfer

  25. 7. Third Mission

  26. 8. Rank in Specialist Subject

  27. Schedule Estimated 4 months (16 weeks) per audit with initial deliverables ready for review in 14 weeks

  28. Thank you

More Related