240 likes | 256 Views
This research article explores the need for different types of interfaces in groupware systems, focusing on maximizing cooperation and mutual awareness among group members. It discusses various communication mechanisms, dealing with high levels of equivocality and uncertainty, and strategies for handling anonymity. The article also introduces the concepts of participation level, impact of ideas, and planning conformity. The authors present examples of appropriate metaphors and versioning techniques in groupware interfaces. The conclusion highlights the active research area of CSCW (Computer-Supported Cooperative Work) and the opportunities for further development and evaluation of groupware interfaces.
E N D
Interfaces for Groupware Marcos R.S. Borges Federal University of Rio de Janeiro José A. Pino Universidad de Chile Carla Valle Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
Interfaces for Groupware • Does Groupware require different types of interfaces? • Maximize cooperation • Mutual Awareness • Multiple views • Examples • How to deal with high level of equivocality and uncertainty? • How to deal with anonymity?
Motivation • Communication Mechanisms • Human to Human • Teams • Data Driven communication • Propagation of Awareness Information • Asynchronous Interaction • Appropriate Metaphors • Versioning • Group Annotation
The post-it and stick-on metaphors Post-it Stick-on
Example = + A + B Z + X Z + X Slide A Slide B Slide A+B The mask metaphor for versioning
Awareness for coordination • Level of participation (Participameter) • Density of contributions • Impact of ideas (Impactmeter) • Level of maturity • Level of conflict • Information and time of posting • Planning conformity
Participameter Item Read Item Known but not Read Item not Read
Participameter Implementation It allows to come back to the element that originated it. Details of the percentages of each element thatcomes from a specific contribution. Total percentage per visited contributions, observations of elements in the pre-meeting.
Conclusions • CSCW is very active research area with many open problems • CSCW is a multi-disciplinary area • Interfaces for groups is new • solutions • evaluation • Opportunities • Can be a motivation for cooperation
Development ConsortiumProposal Marcos R.S. Borges Federal University of Rio de Janeiro José A. Pino Universidad de Chile
Research Group - Chord • 2 members of staff + 1 post doc • 4 + 2 * 1/2 Ph.D. Students • 12 M.Sc. Students • On-going Work • Groupware and Software Engineering • Participatory approach to BP modeling • SISCO - Meeting Preparation • Post-meeting support • Team Works - Support for teams • Cooperative Learning
Research Group - Uchile • 3 members of staff • 1 Ph.D. Student • 4 M.Sc. Students • On-going Work • Participatory approach to BP modeling • SISCO - Meeting Preparation • Cooperative Learning
Uchile + UFRJ • CLEI • Cyted - RITOS • SISCO • REPARTE • Bi-lateral Cooperation • Joint research activities • Publications • Exchange of Students
The Cyted Style Cooperation • Networks • Put people in touch • Academic Projects • Goals and Results • Projects with the industry (innovation) • Prototypes and Products • 76 networks, • 95 research projects • 166 innovation projects
development of research/industrial projects Cooperation Activities mobility of faculty members and students participation/organization of scientific events interchange of students organization of courses dissemination of information
Conclusion • Goals • HCI Community • Actions • ? • Measurements • ?