1 / 17

Ready for University

Longitudinal, comparative evaluation of workshops to help Access and A-level students understand university assessment criteria. Ready for University. James Elander & Anna Jessen Harrogate 4th July 2007. Background. Widening participation in HE: greater need for learning support

danika
Download Presentation

Ready for University

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Longitudinal, comparative evaluation of workshops to help Access and A-level students understand university assessment criteria Ready for University James Elander & Anna Jessen Harrogate 4th July 2007

  2. Thames Valley University Background Widening participation in HE: greater need for learning support Support often given at HE level This project: support at FE Only 59% of undergraduate students believe A-level adequately prepared them for university (ICM research, 2006)

  3. Thames Valley University Background Research on university learning and achievement focused on students understanding of assessment and assessment criteria (e.g. Norton, 1990) Workshop interventions in first year module at HE Geography (Pain & Mowl, 1996) Psychology (Elander, 2003) Business studies (Rust et al., 2003)

  4. Thames Valley University Core assessment criteria for writing in psychology (Elander et al, 2006): Addressing the question Structuring Demonstrating understanding Developing argument Using evidence Critical evaluation Using academic language Workshops for first years gave positive evaluations (Assessment Plus Project; Harrington et al., 2006; Norton et al, 2005)

  5. Thames Valley University Project aims Extend the Assessment Plus approach to FE Evaluate workshops on university assessment criteria for A-level and Access psychology students In order to… Improve FE students’ understanding of university assessment criteria Improve FE-to-HE progression, and HE retention

  6. Thames Valley University Methods Setting: TVU, a dual sector institution with both FE and HE sector Focus: psychology students Students' understanding of assessment criteria measured through questionnaires Understanding compared Informed design of workshops

  7. FE HE I know what tutors are looking for in an essay* 63.5% 52.4% I understand the meaning of “building an argument” in an essay 78.4% 69.5% I know how to detect bias in written sources* 71.6% 34.4% Baseline questionnaire outcome • FE students felt more confident about the assessment criteria than HE Table 1: Proportion of FE (N=74) and HE (N= 191) students who “agreed” or “strongly agreed” to the statements… * P< 0.05 Thames Valley University

  8. Thames Valley University HE students with (n=53) and without (n=119) A-level psychology Q: To “address the question”, structuring some relevant material to the essay title is more important than including ALL the right information. True or false? Fig 1. Percent giving true/false/don’t know responses χ2 = 6.9, p = .03

  9. Thames Valley University Workshop content: Session one: talk on assessment criteria and homework of two essays Session two: work in group with two essays and discuss in class how they met the assessment criteria Essays: Relevant to current programme of study Included one poor and one good essay

  10. Thames Valley University Participants A level: workshops embedded in course Access: workshop optional extra Total number of students taking part: 43 16 AS psychology students 15 A2 psychology students 9 Access students 3 other Mean age: 19 Years (16-50) 29 females, 14 males

  11. Thames Valley University 1) Student feedback questionnaire 2) Follow-up questionnaire Same questions as at baseline, completed by attending and non-attending students 3) Student achievement Analysis of grades currently in progress Workshop evaluation measured through…

  12. 1) Feedback questionnaireTable 2 proportion of students (N=33) answering “agree” or “strongly agree” to: “The workshops helped me…” … understand assessment criteria 54.9% … understand what makes a good essay 64.5 % … feel more confident about writing essays 20.0% … to critically evaluate 39.7% … to develop an argument 35.5% … to structure 38.7% … to demonstrate understanding 22.5% Thames Valley University

  13. 2) Follow-up questionnaire Q: To “address the essay question”, structuring some relevant material to the essay title is more important than including ALL the right information. True or false? Fig 2. Percent answering ‘true’ Thames Valley University

  14. 2) Follow-up questionnaire Q: Developing an argument in an essay is more about putting one’s view forward than examining the pros and cons of an issue. True or false? Fig 3. Percent answering ‘false’ Thames Valley University

  15. Thames Valley University Qualitative feedback “Helped more than many books that I’ve read about essay writing” “A waste of time, go revise and pass your A-levels instead” “Come to one it may help you because it helped me”

  16. Thames Valley University Conclusion & future research Overall appreciation of workshops Changed student belief about criteria FE over-confidence FE students’ grade analysis Huddersfield & Aston university Teaching material available at writenow website

  17. Please visit our website www.writenow.ac.uk/readyforuniversity.html anna.jessen@tvu.ac.uk j.elander@derby.ac.uk Thanks to: Psychology teachers at TVU Reading NTFS for funding the project

More Related