1 / 11

Hanohano Engineering

Hanohano Engineering. Joe Van Ryzin Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc. DOANOW Honolulu, Hawaii March 23-25, 2007. An Apology…. Hanohano Engineering. Work Proposed to CEROS.

danil
Download Presentation

Hanohano Engineering

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hanohano Engineering Joe Van RyzinMakai Ocean Engineering, Inc. DOANOWHonolulu, HawaiiMarch 23-25, 2007 Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  2. An Apology… Hanohano Engineering Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  3. Work Proposed to CEROS • Determine feasibility and methodology of detecting low-energy anti-neutrinos from radioactive decay by detectors in the very deep ocean. • Perform engineering studies and component tests to minimize the risks and unknowns associated with such a detector. • Provide a conceptual design and costs. Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  4. Scope of proposed/completed work • Size and sensitivity analysis • Design of basic structure • Successive implosions • Electronics • design for low power • Internal electronics design • Power and communications links • Deployment analysis and simulation • Test Scintillation materials at depth and temp • Conceptual design and pricing Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  5. Hanohano structure • Strict material requirements • Deep ocean, extreme pressures • Implosion of instrument housings • Deployment and recovery • Ease of maintenance & repair • Ease of testing and instrumenting • Practical Design • Simple constructible structure • Stable, safe Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  6. Pressure Issues: Implosion Typical form of an implosion shockwave – derived from experimentation (Orr and Schoenberg, 1976) Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  7. Post CEROS work; 50 kT detector • Total mass: 102 kT • 49% Scintillator: 50 kT; 36m dia x 57m high • 12% Oil: 1 m layer • 20% fresh water: 2 m layer • 8% steel • 6% ballast • 5% droppable anchor Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  8. Deployment: • 1950’s technology: Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  9. Bathyscaphe Challenge • Heavy enough to submerge on surface with drop weight. • Compress during descent. Compresses 2800m3 • Cools on bottom, 1500m3 • Ambient seawater also more dense: • Drop 2800 Tonne anchor; 0.3% buoyancy • 27 minute fast descent and ascent. Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  10. 50 kT • Could even be larger; cost is the major limit • Practical limits are ports and passages; supertankers are ~5x larger. • Easily transportable to any ocean, fits in Suez Canal, not in Panama • Construction: shipyard standards, economical • Separate support and hotel from detector functions • Possible: multiple detectors for one support vessel • Deployment and recovery from great depth is relatively easy – bathyscaphe Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

  11. More to come (hopefully)…. Makai Ocean Engineering, Inc.

More Related