60 likes | 221 Views
Regional heterogeneity in wage distributions. Evidence from Spain Elisabet Motellón Enrique López-Bazo Mayssun El-Attar AQR – IREA, UOC, EUI. ASSUMPTIONS
E N D
Regional heterogeneity in wage distributions. Evidence from SpainElisabet MotellónEnrique López-BazoMayssun El-AttarAQR – IREA, UOC, EUI
ASSUMPTIONS • Regional differentials in productivity and thus in wages are the result of different endowment of characteristics and of regional heterogeneity in their price/return. • Important role of regional endowment of HK and of differences in the return that workers obtain from investments in HK. • OBJECTIVES • General • To prove that regional heterogeneity in the return to HK is the major responsible of wage differentials across regions. • Specifics • To assess the magnitude of regional gaps in nominal and real wages • To decompose the regional wage gap into the contribution of endowments and prices of worker and firm characteristics • To measure the contribution of HK, both endowment and return, on regional wage disparities Intangible assets & regional economic growth Intangible assets & regional economic growth IAREG2
DATABASE Wage Structure Survey for Spain (INE & EUROSTAT): - matched employer-employee dataset micro-data on wages and worker and firm characteristics - includes workers in establishments of at least 10 employees Spatial units: Spanish NUTS II regions 17 Comunidades Autónomas Two groups: Low wage regions vs High wage regions Periods: 1995 & 2002 Main variables: - gross hourly wage (raw wage + complements) in October - HK years of schooling, tenure, experience Intangible assets & regional economic growth Intangible assets & regional economic growth IAREG3
METHODOLOGY • Wage gap decomposition for the entire distribution, and assessment of role of HK • Steps: • 1. Mincerian equations for high-wage (HW) and low-wage (LW) regions • 2. Estimation of counterfactual wagesfor the LW, with wage structure (prices) of HW • 3. Counterfactual wages for LW with returns to human capital of HW • 4. Comparison of actual and counterfactual wage distributions • Effect of differences in return to HK on regional disparities in wage distributions Intangible assets & regional economic growth Intangible assets & regional economic growth IAREG4
MAIN RESULTS • Differences in regional wages not only in the first moment of the wage distribution, but also in its dispersion and shape. • Minor role for compensating differentials (cost of living ) and structural variation (endowment of characteristics) • Differences in regional wage distributions mostly explained by regional heterogeneity in returns (particularly in 2002) • Outstanding role of returns to human capital, with no effect of returns to job and firm characteristics. • Effects are not homogeneous along the wage distribution. Affect the mean, dispersion and shape Intangible assets & regional economic growth Intangible assets & regional economic growth IAREG5
GENERAL CONCLUSION Regional convergence in worker (HK) and job and firm characteristics non effective to reduce regional wage gaps as they are mostly caused by heterogeneity in returns (particularly to HK). Homogenization of regional wage distributions can only be achieved by convergence in (private) returns to human capital Intangible assets & regional economic growth Intangible assets & regional economic growth IAREG6