1 / 3

Figure 3.2 Mad scientist.

Figure 3.1 A two-dimensional model of willingness and aptitude of scientists to participate in Public Engagement Activities. Adapted from the ‘Reward and Recognition of Public Engagement’ report (Dyball and King (2009)). Reproduced with permission of the RCUK. Figure 3.2 Mad scientist.

dante-martinez
Download Presentation

Figure 3.2 Mad scientist.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Figure 3.1 A two-dimensional model of willingness and aptitude of scientists to participate in Public Engagement Activities. Adapted from the ‘Reward and Recognition of Public Engagement’ report (Dyball and King (2009)). Reproduced with permission of the RCUK.

  2. Figure 3.2 Mad scientist.

  3. Figure 3.3 The graph represents the lifetime development of a full-time sciencecommunicator. The inset box shows the much smaller amount of time and developmentthat may apply to science communication when practiced (and taught as a sideline) to themain career of a scientist with initial training. However, with support and planningthroughout your career, further progress towards ‘expert’ can be achieved. Adapted from‘Towards a professional framework for scientists involved in public engagement work’, areport prepared for the Wellcome Sanger Institute by A. Macleod (2010). Reproduced bypermission of the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute.

More Related