1 / 7

Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN

Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN. Tan Pek Yew, Jun Hirano & Takashi Aramaki (Panasonic). Content. Definition of Data Stream in .11 WLAN Burst Ack Transmission in TXOP in .11e Header Information Bit Rates in TXOP Numerical Results Conclusions. Traffic Stream - Definition.

dante-martinez
Download Presentation

Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Overheads in Data Stream Over WLAN Tan Pek Yew, Jun Hirano & Takashi Aramaki (Panasonic) Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  2. Content • Definition of Data Stream in .11 WLAN • Burst Ack Transmission in TXOP in .11e • Header Information Bit Rates in TXOP • Numerical Results • Conclusions Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  3. Traffic Stream - Definition Based on IEEE802.11e Draft 3.0 A traffic stream is a set of MSDUs to be delivered subject to the QoS parameter values provided to the MAC in a particular traffic specification (TSPEC) Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  4. Burst Transmission in TXOP(not Fragmented) Based on 54 Mbps PHY Full Header with Payload (2312 bytes) = 368 usec Data Packet Header Address Fields = 4 usec % for Address Fields = 4*(10+3)/4028 = 1.29% TXOP = 3968 uS Burst Data = 10 packets BurstAckReq(24uS) BurstAck(44uS) Burst Data Burst Data Burst Data(368uS) CF POLL(44uS) CF POLL Burst Data SIF(16uS) SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  5. Burst Transmission in TXOP (Fragmented) TXOP = 3712 uS Burst Data = 5 packets BurstAckReq(24uS) BurstAck(44uS) Burst Data Burst Data Burst Data(704uS) CF POLL(44uS) CF POLL Burst Data SIF(16uS) SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF SIF Fragment to 9 MPDUs Payload(1) (256 bytes) H Payload(9) (264 bytes) H SIF Based on 54 Mbps PHY Full Header with Payload (256-264 bytes) = 64 usec Header Address Fields Overhead = 4 usec % for Address Fields = 4*((5*9)+3)/3772 = 5.09% Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  6. Numerical Results Assumptions • Same PHY overheads as data rates increases • Worst Case Scenarios Encountered – Fragmented Packets Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

  7. Conclusions • To Achieve High Throughput • Reduction of irrelevant header information • Substantial data rates can be saved from header information • Proposed that High Throughput and Future version of WNG to look into • irrelevant information be removed for data packets from one traffic stream Tan Pek-Yew, Panasonic

More Related