1 / 21

País Verde, Sunshine State: Comparative Analysis of Costa Rica and Florida Water Allocation Law

País Verde, Sunshine State: Comparative Analysis of Costa Rica and Florida Water Allocation Law. Viviana Cover Ruiz, Licda. Candidata Joanna Reilly-Brown, M.S. & J.D. Candidate Veronica Saavedra, M.S. & J.D. Candidate Supervised by: Thomas Ankersen

daquan-neal
Download Presentation

País Verde, Sunshine State: Comparative Analysis of Costa Rica and Florida Water Allocation Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. País Verde, Sunshine State:Comparative Analysis of Costa Rica and Florida Water Allocation Law Viviana Cover Ruiz, Licda. Candidata Joanna Reilly-Brown, M.S. & J.D. Candidate Veronica Saavedra, M.S. & J.D. Candidate Supervised by: Thomas Ankersen Director, Jt. Program & Conservation Clinic Richard Hamann, Supervising Attorney University of Florida, Levin College of Law

  2. Presentation Overview • Introduction: Why is Costa Rica’s water law in need of reform? • Why compare Florida’s water law? • Legal status of water under common law and civil law • Comparative analysis of legal basis for water allocation under 1942 law, Florida law, and popular initiative

  3. Presentation Overview • Analysis of the governance structure for water allocation decisions under both Florida law and the popular initiative • Analysis of the relationship between water allocation decision-making and land use planning under both systems • Analysis of the legal mechanisms and standards for challenging allocation decisions made by governance entities under both systems • Conclusions and Recommendations

  4. Importance of Reform • Costa Rica currently operates under 1942 water law • Recent water shortages, conflicts among competing uses • Sardinal case • Demonstrates need for water law reform • Bill for Integrated Management of Water Resources by Popular Initiative • Draft law • Result of pressure from water policy advocates

  5. Why Compare Florida Water Law? • Florida’s 1972 Water Resources Act • Hailed as national model • Evaluate water allocation decision-making under proposed law and make recommendations for reform in Costa Rica based on Florida water law successes and failures

  6. Background: Common and civil law of water

  7. Legal standard for permit issuance

  8. Procedures for issuance of permits/concessions

  9. Procedures for issuance of permits

  10. Protection of natural resources

  11. Water allocation priority standards (hierarchy of uses)

  12. Water allocation priority standards (hierarchy of uses) - Continued

  13. Florida Governance Structure • FDEP - state agency with supervisory authority • 5 regional WMDs • Subject to DEP authority • Based primarily on watershed boundaries • Permitting and planning authority • CUP - consumptive use permits • ERP - land development permits • Taxing authority • Property tax • Land acquisition authority Water Management Districts

  14. Proposed Initiative Governance Structure • MINAET • National Directorate of Water Resources • National Water Resources Council • Hydrological units • Agency of Natural Water Resources • Watershed Council

  15. Link between water allocation decision-making and land use planning in Florida • Explosive population growth - increased demands for water • Water allocation and land use planning historically poorly coordinated • Local governments responsible for land use planning • Must consider WMDs regional supply plans • Districts have “review and comment” function • Concurrency legislation • “adequate water supplies” added to Section 163.3180(2)(a), Florida Statutes in 2005

  16. Water allocation decision making and land use planning under proposed initiative • Water Planning instruments • National Water Balance • National Water Plan • Plans Water Hydrologic Unit • National sectoral policies and plans • Classification of Water Bodies • Land use plans, regulatory plans by counties and watershed management plans • Impressive framework • Need to establish clear relationship between government authority to approve development plans and water availability

  17. Remedies: Order agency action of law Order agency exercise of discretion of law; Set aside agency action; Remand for agency proceedings; Decide rights, privileges, obligations, requirements, or procedures at issue Order such ancillary relief court finds necessary to redress effects of official action wrongfully taken or withheld. Standing: Any person substantially affected by a final action of any agency with respect to a permit Administrative Procedure Act Ch. 120.68 Judicial Review Challenging allocation decisions - Florida

  18. Remedies available and procedure for decision-making NOT mentioned. No appeal after grant denied Other available path: Art. 50 of CR Constitution Standing: Those of the public who are negatively affected National Water Resource Directorate Art. 57 Opposition Challenging allocation decisions under the proposed initiative

  19. Recommendations • Popular initiative should: • Explicitly establish permitting requirements for existing users • Require that each hydrological unit establish its water allocation priorities/hierarchy of uses within a specified period of time (~ 1 year) • Establish a clear relationship between government authority to approve development plans and water availability • Add a specific article to allow the public to challenge water allocation decisions • Create a separate funding authority to collect taxes, fees, and payments for environmental services

  20. Secondary Recommendations • Popular initiative should: • Establish environmental flows first as basis for determining amount of available water, rather than delaying establishment of minimum flows • Allocate water to specific uses consistent with the regional water use plans or land use plans rather than a hierarchy • Include internet-based participation (email notices, searches) to publish and notify and challenging decisions rather than relying on antiquated paper notification

  21. Questions?

More Related