1 / 33

Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke Care The INSTINCT Trial

Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke Care The INSTINCT Trial. NIH / NINDS R01 NS050372. Background. Stroke patients, properly treated with tPA, have an 11% absolute greater chance of a normal outcome compared to untreated patients. Current Treatment Rates are 1-3% of all ischemic strokes

darcie
Download Presentation

Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke Care The INSTINCT Trial

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke CareThe INSTINCT Trial NIH / NINDS R01 NS050372

  2. Background • Stroke patients, properly treated with tPA, have an 11% absolute greater chance of a normal outcome compared to untreated patients. • Current Treatment Rates are 1-3% of all ischemic strokes • Optimized systems demonstrate treatment rates of 8-15%

  3. Objectives • Review INSTINCT trial methods for identification of local barriers • Understand taxonomy of barriers to increasing tPA use in stroke • Enhance awareness of local external barriers to tPA use in stroke • Develop methods to address selected barriers

  4. The INSTINCT Trial • To test whether hospitals receiving the educational intervention have a ≥ 4% increase in appropriate tPA use compared to matched controls • To test whether the intervention enhances EP knowledge, beliefs and attitudes regarding tPA use in stroke

  5. INSTINCT Hospitals

  6. Trial Specifics • Multi-center, randomized, controlled trial testing a multi-level, systems-based, educational intervention • Intervention based on adult education and behavior change theory • Tailored to local needs by identifying local barriers • Based on clinical pilot data

  7. Control Intervention Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months CROSSOVER

  8. Outcome Measures • ∆ % of tPA-treated stroke patients • ∆ % of “appropriately” tPA-treated stroke patients • ∆ % of tPA-treated stroke patients pre- and post-intervention • Pre- and post-intervention change in physician knowledge, beliefs and attitudes • General measures of effectiveness of tx

  9. What Barriers Prevent Physicians from Following Guidelines? • Screened 5,658 articles describing barriers to guideline adherence • 76 selected based on focus on clinical guidelines and examination of at least 1 barrier • Contained 120 different surveys • Evaluating 293 potential barriers • Interrater reliability for selection, k = 0.93 Cabana et al: Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465

  10. Barriers to Physician Adherence to Practice Guidelines in Relation to Behavior Change Cabana, M. D. et al. JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465.

  11. External Barriers: Overview • Guideline related • Difficult to use • Inconvenient • Confusing / contradictory • Patient related • Time to arrival • Patient expectations vs. reality • Environmental • Lack of time • Lack of resources • Organizational constraints • Lack of reimbursement • Medical-legal issues Cabana et al: Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465

  12. Stroke Treatment Stakeholders • Patients and Community • EMS • Emergency department staff • Radiology • Neurology • Intensive care staff • Primary care physicians • Administrators

  13. Overcoming Barriers • Data Questions • Effectiveness • Delivery Systems • Specialist Support

  14. External Barriers: Local • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site

  15. Local External Barriers: Emergency Physician Survey • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site

  16. Local External Barriers: Qualitative Assessment • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site

  17. Group Discussion: Solutions • Tailor remaining discussion and slides to specific external barriers identified • Examples follow

  18. Transforming Acute Care • Recognize stakeholders in treatment and find agreement • Improve “Detection-Door-Data-Decision-Drug” process • Outpatient / ED • Inpatient Napoleon greeting Baron Larrey, his Surgeon-in-Chief at Waterloo

  19. EP ABILITY TO Dx STROKE Variable reports Kothari 1996 - 100% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity Alder 1999 - 6/70 patients misdiagnosed (UK) Libman 1996 - 19% stroke “mimics”

  20. Impact of Stroke System Development

  21. NEUROLOGY <50% neurologists treating with t-PA Significant number are skeptical Lack of reimbursement Lack of neurologists

  22. RADIOLOGY Who can interpret CT’s? Availability of radiology interps What about early hypodensity? ECASS data Schriger study

  23. 113 141 17 58 52 48 14 168 120* 163* 161* 137 149 84 ICH Management • Suspecting ICH • Stat Head CT • Labs • CBC, Plts, Coags, Fibrinogen, T&S • Prepare • 6-8 units cryoprecipitate • 6-8 units platelets • Consultation • Neurosurgery • Hematology

  24. Tools • Protocol • NIHSS • Triage tools • EMS tools • Informed consent • Post-treatment care guidelines

  25. Brain Injury Group Access • Contact information

  26. Telemedicine: Results • 24 patients evaluated over 2 years • 50% with Telestroke consultation • 75% of eligible patients treated with tPA • Mean consult-to-drug time = 36 min • Avoided transfer in 46% of patients

  27. Decision: tPA Excluded • Benefit still occurs – for patients and system • Start stroke management pathway in ED • Orders to begin now: • Aspirin • Thermoregulation • Glucose regulation • NPO - until swallowing evaluated • DVT Prophylaxis • Rehab/SW consults initiated

  28. Larger Systems of Stroke Care • Market forces / local interest • GIS analysis • Optimum locations for stroke centers • Maximum coverage with minimum costs • Combines models

  29. The Current National Stroke Reality

  30. A Vision of the Future…

  31. The Impact (T.E. Dec 2003, 37 yo female RN)

  32. Summary • Thrombolytic treatment rates remain below those reported in optimized systems • Multiple barriers exist to changing system behavior toward stroke • A multi-level educational intervention creates the optimal chance for system change • If successful, INSTINCT may serve as a model to enhance delivery of other complex medical therapies

  33. Changing Stroke Systems

More Related