350 likes | 596 Views
Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke Care The INSTINCT Trial. NIH / NINDS R01 NS050372. Background. Stroke patients, properly treated with tPA, have an 11% absolute greater chance of a normal outcome compared to untreated patients. Current Treatment Rates are 1-3% of all ischemic strokes
E N D
Reducing External Barriers to Acute Stroke CareThe INSTINCT Trial NIH / NINDS R01 NS050372
Background • Stroke patients, properly treated with tPA, have an 11% absolute greater chance of a normal outcome compared to untreated patients. • Current Treatment Rates are 1-3% of all ischemic strokes • Optimized systems demonstrate treatment rates of 8-15%
Objectives • Review INSTINCT trial methods for identification of local barriers • Understand taxonomy of barriers to increasing tPA use in stroke • Enhance awareness of local external barriers to tPA use in stroke • Develop methods to address selected barriers
The INSTINCT Trial • To test whether hospitals receiving the educational intervention have a ≥ 4% increase in appropriate tPA use compared to matched controls • To test whether the intervention enhances EP knowledge, beliefs and attitudes regarding tPA use in stroke
Trial Specifics • Multi-center, randomized, controlled trial testing a multi-level, systems-based, educational intervention • Intervention based on adult education and behavior change theory • Tailored to local needs by identifying local barriers • Based on clinical pilot data
Control Intervention Baseline 3 months 6 months 9 months CROSSOVER
Outcome Measures • ∆ % of tPA-treated stroke patients • ∆ % of “appropriately” tPA-treated stroke patients • ∆ % of tPA-treated stroke patients pre- and post-intervention • Pre- and post-intervention change in physician knowledge, beliefs and attitudes • General measures of effectiveness of tx
What Barriers Prevent Physicians from Following Guidelines? • Screened 5,658 articles describing barriers to guideline adherence • 76 selected based on focus on clinical guidelines and examination of at least 1 barrier • Contained 120 different surveys • Evaluating 293 potential barriers • Interrater reliability for selection, k = 0.93 Cabana et al: Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465
Barriers to Physician Adherence to Practice Guidelines in Relation to Behavior Change Cabana, M. D. et al. JAMA 1999;282:1458-1465.
External Barriers: Overview • Guideline related • Difficult to use • Inconvenient • Confusing / contradictory • Patient related • Time to arrival • Patient expectations vs. reality • Environmental • Lack of time • Lack of resources • Organizational constraints • Lack of reimbursement • Medical-legal issues Cabana et al: Why Don’t Physicians Follow Clinical Practice Guidelines? JAMA. 1999;282:1458-1465
Stroke Treatment Stakeholders • Patients and Community • EMS • Emergency department staff • Radiology • Neurology • Intensive care staff • Primary care physicians • Administrators
Overcoming Barriers • Data Questions • Effectiveness • Delivery Systems • Specialist Support
External Barriers: Local • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site
Local External Barriers: Emergency Physician Survey • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site
Local External Barriers: Qualitative Assessment • Insert customized data from INSTINCT Barrier Assessment process for each intervention site
Group Discussion: Solutions • Tailor remaining discussion and slides to specific external barriers identified • Examples follow
Transforming Acute Care • Recognize stakeholders in treatment and find agreement • Improve “Detection-Door-Data-Decision-Drug” process • Outpatient / ED • Inpatient Napoleon greeting Baron Larrey, his Surgeon-in-Chief at Waterloo
EP ABILITY TO Dx STROKE Variable reports Kothari 1996 - 100% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity Alder 1999 - 6/70 patients misdiagnosed (UK) Libman 1996 - 19% stroke “mimics”
NEUROLOGY <50% neurologists treating with t-PA Significant number are skeptical Lack of reimbursement Lack of neurologists
RADIOLOGY Who can interpret CT’s? Availability of radiology interps What about early hypodensity? ECASS data Schriger study
113 141 17 58 52 48 14 168 120* 163* 161* 137 149 84 ICH Management • Suspecting ICH • Stat Head CT • Labs • CBC, Plts, Coags, Fibrinogen, T&S • Prepare • 6-8 units cryoprecipitate • 6-8 units platelets • Consultation • Neurosurgery • Hematology
Tools • Protocol • NIHSS • Triage tools • EMS tools • Informed consent • Post-treatment care guidelines
Brain Injury Group Access • Contact information
Telemedicine: Results • 24 patients evaluated over 2 years • 50% with Telestroke consultation • 75% of eligible patients treated with tPA • Mean consult-to-drug time = 36 min • Avoided transfer in 46% of patients
Decision: tPA Excluded • Benefit still occurs – for patients and system • Start stroke management pathway in ED • Orders to begin now: • Aspirin • Thermoregulation • Glucose regulation • NPO - until swallowing evaluated • DVT Prophylaxis • Rehab/SW consults initiated
Larger Systems of Stroke Care • Market forces / local interest • GIS analysis • Optimum locations for stroke centers • Maximum coverage with minimum costs • Combines models
The Impact (T.E. Dec 2003, 37 yo female RN)
Summary • Thrombolytic treatment rates remain below those reported in optimized systems • Multiple barriers exist to changing system behavior toward stroke • A multi-level educational intervention creates the optimal chance for system change • If successful, INSTINCT may serve as a model to enhance delivery of other complex medical therapies