640 likes | 832 Views
The Future of Integrated Library Systems: . Moving toward new models and open systems. Marshall Breeding Director for Innovative Technologies and Research Vanderbilt University http://staffweb.library.vanderbilt.edu/breeding http://www.librarytechnology.org/.
E N D
The Future of Integrated Library Systems: Moving toward new models and open systems Marshall BreedingDirector for Innovative Technologies and Research Vanderbilt University http://staffweb.library.vanderbilt.edu/breeding http://www.librarytechnology.org/ Massachusetts Library Association Pre-Conference: The Future of the ILS Tuesday, May 6 9:30 – 10:30am
Abstract • Libraries demand choice. No matter which ILS (Integrated Library System) a library uses, the future is changing rapidly and libraries are facing difficult choices. This presentation will provide a review of the business and industry trends affecting ILSs as well as forecast what emerging technologies in the next generation ILS will bring to libraries.
Technology Landscape • Most ILS products from commercial vendors mature • None less than a decade old • Approaching end of life cycle? • Evolved systems • No success in launching new systems in the commercial sphere • Horizon 8.0 • Taos
Current Vintage • ALEPH 500 1996 • Voyager 1995 • Unicorn 1982 • Polaris 1997 • Virtua 1995 • Koha 1999 • Library.Solution 1997 • Evergreen 2004 • Talis 1992
Business Landscape • Library Journal Automated System Marketplace: • Opportunities Emerge in the midst of Turmoil (2008) • An Industry redefined (2007) • Reshuffling the Deck (2006) • An increasingly consolidated industry • Moving out of a previous phase of fragmentation where many companies expend energies producing decreasingly differentiated systems in a limited marketplace • Private Equity playing a stronger role then ever before; VCs exit • Narrowing of product options • Increasing dissatisfaction with purely commercial, closed source options • Open Source opportunities rise to challenge the grip of traditional commercial model
Industry Health 2008 • Overall industry showing some growth; individual companies more profitable then ever. • Mixed company growth according to personnel counts: • Ex Libris +6% • Innovative + 5% • Library Corporation -10% • SirsiDynix -28% • ILS sales represent smaller portion of revenue • Many smaller libraries purchasing automation systems • Very few large library ILS procurements
Other Business Observations • Creative tension abounds • Level of innovation falls below expectations, despite deep resources and large development teams. • Companies struggle to keep up with ILS enhancements and R&D for new innovations. • Pressure from investors/owners to reduce costs, increase revenue • Pressure from library customers for more innovative products • Some companies investing in technology; expanding markets
ILS Migration Trends • Few voluntary lateral migrations • Forced Migrations • Vendor abandonment • Need to move from legacy systems • Exit from bad marriages with vendors • Exit from bad marriages with consortia
Role of the ILS in Library Automation Strategies • It’s never been harder for libraries to justify investments in ILS • Need for products focused on electronic content and user experience • Next-gen interfaces • Federated search • Linking • Electronic Resource Management
A new direction in library automation • A successful pitch for new automation software is one that enables significant transformation toward a new vision of the library. • Can’t keep doing the same thing in the same way • Back-end systems make only a moderate impact on customer service delivery
An age of less integrated systems • Increasingly dis-integrated environment • Core ILS supplemented by: • OpenURL Link Resolvers • Metasearch / Federated Search • Electronic Resource Management • Next Generation Library Interfaces • RFID / AMH
No longer an ILS-centric industry • Portion of revenues derived from core ILS products diminishing relative to other library tech products • Many companies and organizations that don’t offer an ILS are involved in library automation: • Cambridge Information Group • ProQuest • Serials Solutions • WebFeat • Bowker • Syndetic Solutions • AquaBrowser • MuseGlobal
OCLC in the Automation Industry • Initial foray into next-gen interface arena: WorldCat Local • Technology acquisitions: • OCLC Pica purchased Sisis on July 1, 2005 for $4,504,700 • OCLC Pica purchased FDI on Nov 2, 2005 for $8,913,100 • OCLC purchased Openly Informatics for $1,950,000 • OCLC purchased DiMeMa on Aug 14, 2006 for $3,916,200 • EZproxy acquired in Jan 2008 • Library automation services at the network level • Not an ILS? • An “ILS killer”?
Open Source Alternatives • Explosive interest in Open Source driven by disillusionment with current vendors • Beginning to emerge as a practical option • TOC (Total Cost of Ownership) still roughly equal to proprietary commercial model • Open Source still a risky Alternative • Commercial/Proprietary options also a risk • “The SirsiDynix announcement changed the landscape of the ILS marketplace; the traditional ILS market is no longer a haven for the risk adverse.” (http://pines.bclibrary.ca/resources/talking-points)
Open Source Initiatives • Multiple projects to develop Open Source ILS • Koha Zoom • Evergreen • OPALS-NA (K-12 Schools) • Delft Libraries • Multiple projects to develop Open Source Next-gen Catalogs • VU Find (Villanova University) • C4 prototype (University of Rochester River Campus Libraries)
Andrew W. Mellon Foundation • Soliciting a proposal for the design of an Open Source ILS for higher education • Led by Duke University • Early stages. Proposal in development • First and Second stage funding for eXtensible Catalog
Market share / Perspective • Open Source ILS implementations still a very small percentage of the total picture • Initial set of successful implementations will likely serve as a catalyst to pave the way for others • Successful implementations in wider range of libraries: • State-wide consortium (Evergreen) • Multi-site public library systems (Koha) • School district consortia (OPALS-NA)
Open Source Companies • Index Data • Founded 1994; No ILS; A variety of other open source products to support libraries: search engines, federated search, Z39.50 toolkit, etc • LibLime • Founded 2005. Provides development and support services for Koha ILS. Acquired original developers of Koha in Feb 2007. • Marc Roberson – VP Library Partners • John Rose – VP Strategic markets • Debra Denault -- Operations Manager • Equinox. • Founded Feb 2007; staff formerly associated with GPLS Pines development team • Care Affiliates • Founded June 2007; headed by industry veteran Carl Grant.
Impact of Open Source • Formidable competition to commercial closed-source products • Alternative to the traditional software licensing models • Pressure to increase innovation • Pressure to decrease costs • Pressure to make commercial systems more open • Disrupts the status quo
Open source ILS Benchmarks • Most decisions to adopt Open Source ILS based on philosophical preferences • Open Source ILS will enter the main stream once its products begin to win through objective procurement processes • Hold open source ILS to the same standards as the commercial products • Hold the open source ILS companies to the same standards: • Adequate customer support ratios, financial stability, service level agreements, etc. • Well-documented total cost of ownership statements that can be compared to other vendor price quotes • Do the Open Source ILS products offer a new vision?
Working toward a new generation of library interfaces • Redefinition of the “library catalog” • Traditional notions of the library catalog are being questioned • Better information delivery tools • More powerful search capabilities • More elegant presentation
Redefinition of library catalogs • More comprehensive information discovery environments • It’s no longer enough to provide a catalog limited to the traditional library inventory • Digital resources cannot be an afterthought • Forcing users to use different interfaces depending on type of content becoming less tenable • Libraries working toward consolidated search environments that give equal footing to digital and print resources
Comprehensive Search Service • More like OAI • Open Archives Initiative • Consolidated search services based on metadata and data gathered in advance • Problems of scale diminished • Problems of cooperation persist • Eg: Royal Library of Denmark
Web 2.0 Flavorings • A more social and collaborative approach • Web Tools and technology that foster collaboration • Tagging, social bookmarking, user rating, user reviews, community interaction
The holy grail of New Gen Library Interfaces • A single point of entry into all the content and services offered by the library • Print + Electronic • Local + Remote • Locally created Content
Interface expectations • Millennial generation library users are well acclimated to the Web • Used to relevancy ranking • The “good stuff” should be listed first • Users tend not to delve deep into a result list • Good relevancy requires a sophisticated approach, including objective matching criteria supplemented by popularity and relatedness factors. • “Did you mean?” and other features to avoid “No results found” • More like this / related content
Interface expectations (cont…) • Very rapid response. Users have a low tolerance for slow systems • Rich visual information: book jacket images, rating scores, etc. • Let users drill down through the result set incrementally narrowing the field • Faceted Browsing • Drill-down vs up-front Boolean or “Advanced Search” • gives the users clues about the number of hits in each sub topic • Ability to explore collections without a priori knowledge • Navigational Bread crumbs
Deep search • Increasing opportunities to search the full contents • Google Library Print, Google Publisher, Open Content Alliance, Microsoft Live Book Search, etc. • High-quality metadata will improve search precision • Commercial search providers already offer “search inside the book” • No comprehensive full text search for books quite yet • Not currently available through library search environments
Beyond Discovery • Fulfillment oriented • Search -> select -> view • Delivery/Fulfillment much harder than discovery • Back-end complexity should be as seamless as possible to the user
Library-specific Features • Appropriate relevance factors • Objective keyword ranking + Library weightings • Circulation frequency, OCLC holdings, scholarly content • Results grouping (FRBR) • Collection focused (vs sales-driven)
Enterprise Integration • Ability to deliver content and services through non-library applications • Campus portal solutions • Courseware • Social networking environments • Search portals / Feed aggregators
Smart and Sophisticated • Much more difficult than old gen OPACS • Not a dumbed-down approach • Wed library specific requirements and expectations with e-commerce technologies
Architecture and Standards • Need to have an standard approach for connecting new generation interfaces with ILS and other repositories • Proprietary and ad hoc methods currently prevail • Digital Library Federation • ILS-Discovery Interface Group
New-Gen Library Interfaces Current Commercial and Open Source Products
Endeca Guided Navigation • North Carolina State University http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/catalog/ • McMaster University http://libcat.mcmaster.ca/ • Phoenix Public Library http://www.phoenixpubliclibrary.org/ • Florida Center for Library Automation http://catalog.fcla.edu/ux.jsp
AquaBrowser Library • Queens Borough Public Library • http://aqua.queenslibrary.org/ • Oklahoma State University • http://boss.library.okstate.edu/ • University of Chicago • http://lens.lib.uchicago.edu/
Ex Libris Primo • Discovery and Delivery platform for academic libraries • Vanderbilt University http://alphasearch.library.vanderbilt.edu • University of Minnesota http://prime2.oit.umn.edu:1701/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do?vid=TWINCITIES • University of Iowa http://smartsearch.uiowa.edu/
Encore from Innovative Interfaces • Designed for academic, public and special libraries • Nashville Public Library http://nplencore.library.nashville.org/iii/encore/app • Scottsdale Public Library http://encore.scottsdaleaz.gov/iii/encore/app • Yale University Lillian Goldman Law Library http://encore.law.yale.edu/iii/encore/app
OCLC Worldcat Local • OCLC Worldcat customized for local library catalog • Relies on hooks into ILS for local services • Tied to library holdings set in WorldCat • University of Washington Libraries http://uwashington.worldcat.org/ • University of California Melvyl Catalog
SirsiDynix • Recently announced their next generation discovery environment named Enterprise • Relies on Globalbrain technology from Brainware • Many legacy interfaces • Enterprise Portal Solution • Rooms / SchoolRooms • iLink / iBistro (legacy) • Product based on FAST announced in March 2006 – withdrawn
VUFind – Villanova University Based on Apache Solr search toolkit http://www.vufind.org/
Library-developed solutions • eXtensible Catalog • University of Rochester – River Campus Libraries • Financial support from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation • http://www.extensiblecatalog.info/
Working toward a new ILS Vision • How libraries work has changed dramatically over the last 20 years. • ILS built largely on workflows cast more than 25 years ago • Based on assumptions that have long since changed • Digital resources represent at least half of most academic libraries collection budgets • The automation needs of libraries today is broader than that provided by the legacy ILS
Libraries ready for a new course • Level of dissatisfaction with the current slate of ILS products is very high. • Large monolithic systems are unwieldy—very complex to install, administer and maintain. • Continue to be large gaps in functionality • Interlibrary loan • Collection development • Preservation: print / digital • Book binding • Remote storage operations
Less Proprietary / More Open • Libraries demand more openness • Open source movement greatest challenge to current slate of commercial ILS products • Demand for open access to data • API’s essential • Beyond proprietary APIs • Ideal: Industry-standard set of API’s implemented by all systems • Current DLF initiative to define API for an ILS for decoupled catalogs
Open but Commercial? • As library values evolve toward open solutions, commercial companies will see increasing advantages in adopting more open strategies • Open Data • Well documented database schemas • APIs for access to all system functionality • More customizability; better integration • Open Source Software? • Key differentiation lies in service and support