1 / 15

A Comprehensive Wastewater & Nitrogen Management Plan for Oyster Pond

A Comprehensive Wastewater & Nitrogen Management Plan for Oyster Pond . How Did We Get Here? …. It was 25 years in the making. In the mid 1980’s alert Falmouth residents noticed a profound change in our estuaries.

darena
Download Presentation

A Comprehensive Wastewater & Nitrogen Management Plan for Oyster Pond

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A Comprehensive Wastewater & Nitrogen Management Plan for Oyster Pond

  2. How Did We Get Here? …. It was 25 years in the making In the mid 1980’s alert Falmouth residents noticed a profound change in our estuaries. • Mid 80s - Pond Watchers Citizen Monitoring program was initiated for Oyster, Little and Green Ponds. • 1987 - Town Meeting appropriated $5,000 “to conduct investigations of the physical, chemical, and biological characteristics” of Oyster, Little, and Green Ponds and to prepare a “comprehensive program for restoration, preservation and maintenance”. • 1989 – Collapsed culvert replaced with larger one causing profound changes to the pond • 1998 – Weir built to control pond salinity • 2006 – Listed as an impaired water body due to nutrients & pathogens on Mass Clean Water Act 303 (d) list • 2007 - Final Massachusetts Estuarine Project (MEP) report for Oyster Pond issued • 2008 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for nitrogen approved for Oyster Pond by the EPA and DEP. • Aug 2010 – Buzzards Bay Coalition & Conservation Law Foundation file suit against EPA for “failing to properly manage sources of nitrogen pollution like septic systems, stormwater, & wastewater treatment plant discharges on Cape Cod including Falmouth and Bourne.” Pond weeds in 2000

  3. What is a Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan?  A CWMP considers all wastewater treatment alternatives through a designated watershed region and prepares a cost effective preliminary plan focused on a defined water quality objective.  • A CWMP usually includes the following: • Needs Assessment – Assess current and future N sources • Develop & Screen Alternatives – ID & evaluate alternative treatment options • Evaluate Alternatives - for feasibility & $ • Identify Recommended Plan – produce prelim.engineered plan Final Product – A long term Plan for nutrient control (wastewater, storm water runoff, fertilizer) of the Pond.

  4. The Benefits of a CWMP? • Gain opportunity for Zero % Financing • Increase cost sharing opportunities • Expand opportunities for expanded innovative alternatives – storm water run-off control, weir/outflow improvements, Mosquito Creek improvements

  5. The Massachusetts Estuaries Project • Sets the Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) – greatest amount of a pollutant a water body can receive without impairment - for nitrogen in Oyster Pond • Is based on restoring oxygen levels in the water column to a 4 meter depth to restore benthic habitat for infaunal inhabitants. Target Concentration Nitrogen - 0.55 mg/L Target Nitrogen Controllable Load – 1.53 kg/day

  6. An example of extreme nitrogen pollution Pirate’s Cove, Barnstable DEP defined status of Oyster Pond

  7. Sources of Nitrogen to Oyster Pond To meet TMDL Targets, 70% of N Load must be removed

  8. Oyster Pond is Unique:It is a Designed Brackish Water Estuary • Salinity is Maintained between 2 -4 ppt • Better Herring Habitat • Suppresses Nitrogen Activity

  9. The Role of the Weir

  10. Simple Mass Balance of Nitrogen Removal Septic System N Load ……………………3.61 kg/day Land Use (SW, Lawns) N Load …...…….1.46 kg/day Oyster Pond Current N Load…………5.07 kg/day Removalof Controllable Load N Load from Treetops - .41 x 3.61 = 1.48 kg/day N Load from WHRC - .04 x 3.61 = .14 kg/day Load from Remaining Residential Homes 1.99 Removal by Denite System x .50 = 1.00 kg/day Load from Land Use (SW, Lawns) .63 x 1.46 = .92 kg/day Total Removal = 3.54 kg/day 5.07 – 3.54 = Target Load = 1.53 kg/day

  11. Possible Comprehensive Wastewater and Nutrient Management Plan Budget for Oyster Pond I. NEEDS ASSESSMENT A.   Hydrology update       Morraine region needs some Monitoring Wells for Mapping           $ 15,000 B. Sources of Nitrogen and Phosphorus         Trying to add P into budget                               $ 10,000 II. DEVELOP & SCREEN ALTERNATIVES  C.  Wastewater and Nutrient Control- Design and permitting review                                                      1. Community Small Plant (prob. Cluster)    Discharge and system outside OP recharge zone                 (flow under 16,000 gpd)                                                                                                 $ 85,000            2.  Small Cluster ( Flow, 12,000 gpd)                                                                                  $ 30,000            3.  Focused denitrification (60-64 units)             High GWflow region                                  $ 15,000            4.  Diffuse Residential (110 units)                                                                                        $ 35,000                  a. Residential turnover-denitrification                  b. Plume interception/barrier            5.  Weir control                                               Salinity control/ N/P ratio/Aquatic Vegetation  $ 20,000            6.  Biomass out-migration, algae                    Herring Propagation                            $  5,000             7.  Land Use - Stormwater runoff, Fertilizer    Roadway, Creek, Lawns, Leaf fall                  $ 15,000  III. EVALUATE ALTERNATIVES      D. TMDL modeling of alternatives                         Computer runs                                        $ 40,000  IV. IDENTIFY RECOMMENDED PLAN      E.  Trunk River Outflow Improvement                    Maint. Dredging, Eel grass screen                $ 20,000 F. Final Report $10,000    $  300,000

  12. Examples of Small Plant Cluster Systems – Innovative DEP Approved

  13. CMNWP Best Possible Time Line • April 2011 – Town Meeting Vote on article • May 2011 – Town Election vote on tax override • July 2011- Request for Proposals (RFPs) go out to public • August 2011 - RFPs reviewed by the Town • September 2011– Consultant Selected, contract signed, initial mtg. • 2012 – Needs Assessment Report • 2012 - Develop & Screen Alternatives Report • 2013 - Evaluate Alternatives &Identify Recommended Plan (Prelim. Engineering Plan) • 2014 – RFP issued for Full Engineering Plan, Engineer Selected • 2015 – Final Engineered Plan developed, Permits issued. • 2016 – Project Ground Breaking

More Related