1 / 90

The Solution of the Kadison -Singer Problem Adam Marcus (Crisply, Yale) Daniel Spielman (Yale)

The Solution of the Kadison -Singer Problem Adam Marcus (Crisply, Yale) Daniel Spielman (Yale) Nikhil Srivastava (MSR/Berkeley). IAS, Nov 5 , 2014. The Kadison -Singer Problem (‘59). A positive solution is equivalent to: Anderson’s Paving Conjectures (‘79, ‘81)

Download Presentation

The Solution of the Kadison -Singer Problem Adam Marcus (Crisply, Yale) Daniel Spielman (Yale)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Solution of the Kadison-Singer Problem Adam Marcus (Crisply, Yale) Daniel Spielman (Yale) Nikhil Srivastava(MSR/Berkeley) IAS, Nov 5, 2014

  2. The Kadison-Singer Problem (‘59) A positive solution is equivalent to: Anderson’s Paving Conjectures (‘79, ‘81) Bourgain-TzafririConjecture (‘91) Feichtinger Conjecture (‘05) Many others Implied by: Akemann and Anderson’s Paving Conjecture (‘91) Weaver’s KS2 Conjecture

  3. The Kadison-Singer Problem (‘59) A positive solution is equivalent to: Anderson’s Paving Conjectures (‘79, ‘81) Bourgain-TzafririConjecture (‘91) Feichtinger Conjecture (‘05) Many others Implied by: Akemann and Anderson’s Paving Conjecture (‘91) Weaver’s KS2 Conjecture

  4. The Kadison-Singer Problem (‘59) A positive solution is equivalent to: Anderson’s Paving Conjectures (‘79, ‘81) Bourgain-TzafririConjecture (‘91) Feichtinger Conjecture (‘05) Many others Implied by: Akemann and Anderson’s Paving Conjecture (‘91) Weaver’s KS2 Conjecture

  5. The Kadison-Singer Problem (‘59) Let be a maximal Abeliansubalgebra of , the algebra of bounded linear operators on Let be a pure state. Is the extension of to unique? See Nick Harvey’s Survey or Terry Tao’s Blog

  6. Anderson’s Paving Conjecture ‘79 For all there is a k so that for every n-by-n symmetric matrix A with zero diagonals, there is a partition of into Recall

  7. Anderson’s Paving Conjecture ‘79 For all there is a k so that for every self-adjoint bounded linear operator A on , there is a partition of into

  8. Anderson’s Paving Conjecture ‘79 For all there is a k so that for every n-by-n symmetric matrix A with zero diagonals, there is a partition of into Is unchangedif restrict to projection matrices. [Casazza, Edidin, Kalra, Paulsen ‘07]

  9. Anderson’s Paving Conjecture ‘79 Equivalent to [Harvey ‘13]: There exist an and a k so that for such that and then exists a partition of into k parts s.t.

  10. Moments of Vectors • The moment of vectors • in the direction of a unit vector is 1 2.5 4

  11. Moments of Vectors • The moment of vectors • in the direction of a unit vector is

  12. Vectors with Spherical Moments For every unit vector

  13. Vectors with Spherical Moments For every unit vector Also called isotropic position

  14. Partition into Approximately ½-Spherical Sets

  15. Partition into Approximately ½-Spherical Sets

  16. Partition into Approximately ½-Spherical Sets

  17. Partition into Approximately ½-Spherical Sets because

  18. Partition into Approximately ½-Spherical Sets because

  19. Big vectors make this difficult

  20. Big vectors make this difficult

  21. Weaver’s Conjecture KS2 There exist positive constants and so that if all then exists a partition into S1 and S2 with

  22. Weaver’s Conjecture KS2 There exist positive constants and so that if all then exists a partition into S1 and S2 with Implies Akemann-Anderson Paving Conjecture, which implies Kadison-Singer

  23. Main Theorem For all if all then exists a partition into S1 and S2 with Implies Akemann-Anderson Paving Conjecture, which implies Kadison-Singer

  24. A Random Partition? Works with high probability if all (by Tropp ‘11, variant of Matrix Chernoff, Rudelson)

  25. A Random Partition? Works with high probability if all (by Tropp ‘11, variant of Matrix Chernoff, Rudelson) Troublesome case: each is a scaled axis vector are of each

  26. A Random Partition? Works with high probability if all (by Tropp ‘11, variant of Matrix Chernoff, Rudelson) Troublesome case: each is a scaled axis vector are of each chance that all in one direction land in same set is

  27. A Random Partition? Works with high probability if all (by Tropp ‘11, variant of Matrix Chernoff, Rudelson) Troublesome case: each is a scaled axis vector are of each chance that all in one direction land in same set is Chance there exists a direction in which all land in same set is

  28. The Graphical Case From a graph G = (V,E) with |V| = n and |E| = m Create m vectors in n dimensions: If G is a good d-regular expander, all eigs close to d very close to spherical

  29. Partitioning Expanders Can partition the edges of a good expander to obtain two expanders. Broder-Frieze-Upfal ‘94: construct random partition guaranteeing degree at least d/4, some expansion Frieze-Molloy ‘99: Lovász Local Lemma, good expander Probability is works is low, but can prove non-zero

  30. We want

  31. We want

  32. We want Consider expected polynomial with a random partition.

  33. Our approach • Prove expected characteristic polynomial • has real roots Prove its largest root is at most Prove is an interlacing family, so exists a partition whose polynomial has largest root at most

  34. The Expected Polynomial Indicate choices by :

  35. The Expected Polynomial

  36. Mixed Characteristic Polynomials For independently chosen random vectors is their mixed characteristic polynomial. Theorem: only depends on and, is real-rooted

  37. Mixed Characteristic Polynomials For independently chosen random vectors is their mixed characteristic polynomial. Theorem: only depends on and, is real-rooted

  38. Mixed Characteristic Polynomials For independently chosen random vectors is their mixed characteristic polynomial. Theorem: only depends on and, is real-rooted

  39. Mixed Characteristic Polynomials For independently chosen random vectors is their mixed characteristic polynomial. The constant term is the mixed discriminant of

  40. The constant term When diagonal and , is a matrix permanent.

  41. The constant term When diagonal and , is a matrix permanent. Van der Waerden’sConjecture becomes If and is minimized when Proved by Egorychev and Falikman ‘81. Simpler proof by Gurvits(see Laurent-Schrijver)

  42. The constant term For Hermitian matrices, is the mixed discriminant Gurvits proved a lower bound on : If and is minimized when This was a conjecture of Bapat.

  43. Real Stable Polynomials A multivariate generalization of real rootedness. Complex roots of come in conjugate pairs. So, real rooted iff no roots with positive complex part.

  44. Real Stable Polynomials for all i is real stable if implies it has no roots in the upper half-plane Isomorphic to Gårding’shyperbolic polynomials Used by Gurvits (in his second proof)

  45. Real Stable Polynomials for all i is real stable if implies it has no roots in the upper half-plane Isomorphic to Gårding’shyperbolic polynomials Used by Gurvits (in his second proof) See surveys of Pemantle and Wagner

  46. Real Stable Polynomials Borcea-Brändén ‘08: For PSD matrices is real stable

  47. Real Stable Polynomials real stable real stable implies is real rooted implies is real stable (LiebSokal ‘81)

  48. Real Roots So, every mixed characteristic polynomial is real rooted.

  49. Interlacing Polynomial interlaces if

  50. Common Interlacing and have a common interlacing if can partition the line into intervals so that each contains one root from each polynomial • ) • ) • ) • ( • ( • ( • ) • (

More Related