370 likes | 533 Views
ASTR 330: The Solar System. Extra credit papers due today, Tuesday December 5th. Warning about this class. Pairs exercise : try to define ‘life’ in the general sense - what are the minimum requirements for something to be ‘living’.
E N D
ASTR 330: The Solar System Extra credit papers due today, Tuesday December 5th. Warning about this class. Pairs exercise: try to define ‘life’ in the general sense - what are the minimum requirements for something to be ‘living’. You may want to consider: plants, bacteria, viruses (both organic and computer!), prions, and organic molecules such as amino acids, DNA and RNA. Announcements Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Lecture 27: Life In the Solar System Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: (i) Levin, The Earth Through Time (ii) NASA GSFC
ASTR 330: The Solar System • In this class we will consider how and wherelife could have arisen in the solar system, and how we might go about looking for it. • Topics are: • Scientific theories for the origins of life on Earth. • Conditions necessary for life. • Mars and Venus, compared to Earth, as possible habitats. • Catastrophic impediments to life. • Searching for life on Mars. Life In The Solar System Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System The puzzle of life for scientists is to imagine how the inanimatechemicals available on the early Earth could have wound up creating complex life forms. The approach to the problem to was break it down into steps. The first step in the chain is the creation of complex organic molecules - amino acids - from more simple inorganic compounds. The term ‘organic’ does not necessarily imply life - organic molecules are any carbon molecules other than a few very simple ones. What chemicals would have been available on the early Earth? From our earlier classes we know that a variety of volatile ice species containing C, H, N and O in various combinations would be likely to be delivered to Earth via planetesimals. From There to Here Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System One of the most famous chemistry experiments of all time is the Miller-Urey experiment, named after two chemists at the University of Chicago. In 1953 (same year as Watson and Crick: DNA helix structure unraveled) these scientists mixed NH3, CH4 and H20 in a vessel, intended to simulate a possible composition of the early Earth’s oceans. The mixture was heated to vaporize the gases, which then passed through a spark chamber, simulating lightening discharges. Finally, any reaction products were condensed and collected for analysis. Miller-Urey Experiment Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: John D Simon, Duke University
ASTR 330: The Solar System At the end of 1 week, the resulting condensate showed a huge variety of compounds. 10-15% of the carbon had formed organic compounds, and 2% had formed amino acids. What are amino acids, and why are they so important? Amino Acids Chemically, an amino acid is a carbon molecule which has three types of bonding other than simple C-H bonds: C=O, C-OH, and C-NH2. Amino acids are the building blocks of proteins, and essential to cellular life as we know it. They are sometimes called prebiological molecules. Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: John D Simon, Duke University
ASTR 330: The Solar System • The original Miller-Urey experiment has been criticized on a number of technical grounds: • The early atmosphere of the Earth was probably not primarily chemically reduced, as originally thought, but rather may have been largely CO, CO2, N2 and H2O. • The experiment used continuous lightening discharge for 1 week: an improbable concentration of energy. • However, other experiments using different starting ingredients have found similar results: it is relatively easy to make amino acids. • Even a sample Titan atmosphere (N2 and CH4) has been used in a Miller-Urey type apparatus, and again amino acids could be made (with a little acid for the oxygen!) Miller-Urey Experiment: Issues Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System The Miller-Urey experiment has somewhat lost its impact over time, as it has been shown that amino acids are actually present in space. This was dramatically demonstrated by analysis of the Murchison Meteorite, a 1969carbonaceous chondrite fall in Australia. More recently, in 2002 the discovery of glycine in interstellar giant molecular clouds (GMCs - the sorts of nebula where stars and planets form) was announced. Sugars and ethanol had already been previously found in GMCs, thought to be formed by the action of UV light on ices. Hence, these molecules can form under a wider range of conditions than shown by Miller and Urey, and indeed life on Earth may have been ‘seeded’ from space! Amino Acids In The Solar System Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System • You think you know what life is, but try defining it! • Is a bacteria alive? What about a virus? A computer virus? • Life can be distinguished by two principal properties: • Metabolism: the ability to utilize energy from the environment. • Reproduction: the ability to code and transmit information through DNA. • Which ability came first: reproduction or metabolism? At the current time, the steps taken from inanimate chemicals to simple forms of life are still largely unknown. • All we know is, that it did happen! What Is Life? Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System It would be wonderful if the fossil record preserved the history of life on Earth for us to look at. However, the Earth’s geology does not seem to have preserved rocks older than 3.8 to 4.0 Gyr old: 600 million years after the Earth had solidified. Why might this be? The earliest fossilized traces of life that we can recognize are of cyanobacteria, or ‘blue-green’ algae. We see definite evidence of these bacteria in rocks as old as 3.5 Gyr. By this time, the bacteria were already forming organized, layered structures called stromatolites (if dome-shaped) or oncolites (if round). These structures form as mats in aquatic environments, and can trap sediments, and sometimes secrete calcium carbonate (limestone), thereby leaving a solid imprint. Earliest Lifeforms on Earth Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Stromatolites (and oncolites etc) are still found today!! (Left) stromatolites at Lake Thetis, Western Australia. Stromatolites (Right) stromatolites at Shark Bay, Western Australia. Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: wikipedia.org
ASTR 330: The Solar System The image (below left) shows a present-day, living cyanobacterium. The right-side image shows a 1-billion year old fossil of a cyanobacterium, from northern Australia.When archean stromatolites are sliced open, we can see similar fossilized shapes to this. Archean Microfossils Aside from the cyanobacteria other, rarer types of fossilized bacteria can be found. For example, the unusual magnetobacteria form tiny crystals of magnetite inside their cells, which are left behind when the organic part of the cell is gone. These tiny remnants, just a few nanometers (10-9 m) in size, hold the record as the smallest fossils. Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: UCMP Berkeley
ASTR 330: The Solar System A second way of tracing the origins of life is to hunt inside living organisms today! But how? Inside every cell in the human body (except red blood cells) is the DNA sequence that we call the human genome: the blueprint for creating us. Most of the DNA is ‘junk’: genes that are no longer used, probably remnants of our long evolutionary history. We may compare the genetic code of humans with other animals and plants, and record correlations or similarities. In this way, we can figure out mathematically which organisms are more or less closely ‘related’ to us as a species. The Genomic Record Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System By comparing the ribosomal RNA (an ingredient of all known life forms) of different organisms, a branched pattern of relationships has been deduced. The more closely related the two species are, the more recently in time that their two genomes diverged. By studying the ribosomal sequences, we now know life exists in 3 main types. Domains of Life Scientists also try to reconstruct the probable characteristics of the ‘last common ancestor’: the very primitive life-form which later evolved down the separate pathways of bacteria, archaea and eukaryota. Our best guess is that our earliest common ancestor was an anaerobic (oxygen-avoiding), thermophilic (heat-loving) bacterium. Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: fossilmuseum.net
ASTR 330: The Solar System Ironically, we now believe that life must have originated in an oxygen-free environment! Why? Free oxygen (O2) is a highly reactive gas, which will tend to combine with reduced gases such CH4 and NH3, converting them to oxides. Most of the compounds necessary for the formation of life are sub-oxidized (e.g. CO is sub-oxidized compared to CO2), such as the amino acids, proteins and so on. If oxygen was plentiful, these biological precursors would have quickly been oxidized. When we examine rocks older than 2.2 Gyr on Earth, we find that they are strongly sub-oxidized. These rocks must have formed in the absence of free oxygen. Stromatolites became widespread at around 2.2 Gyr ago, and as green plants produce O2 as a by-product of photosynthesis, the amount of atmospheric O2 increased. Life and Oxygen Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System When we look at our planetary neighbors (Mars and Venus), we see atmospheres dominated by carbon dioxide. Why not on Earth? We have marine shells to thank for that! The activity of countless billions of shell-forming creatures (mostly microscopic) over billions of years has removed most of the CO2 from the Earth’s atmosphere. How? Shells are manufactured from calcium and carbon dioxide, which dissolves from the atmosphere into the oceans. Eventually, these shells are incorporated into the sediment as limestone. How much CO2 was removed in this way? If the all the current carbonate deposits on Earth were put back into the atmosphere, we would have 70 bars of CO2 pressure, close to the 90 bar atmosphere of Venus, which causes such a massive greenhouse effect. CO2 on Mars, Venus and Earth Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Even without life, the Earth’s atmosphere would slowly evolve over time. CO2 is removed by non-biological processes, a reaction with silicate rocks, which can lead to carbonate formation. Another process driving atmospheric change is photo-dissociation, which we have mentioned in the context of the outer planets. On Earth, molecules such as CH4and NH3 would be broken apart by solar UV light in the upper atmosphere, and the hydrogen is then able to escape to space. Over time, CH4 would convert to CO2(taking oxygen from water) and NH3to N2, which we see today. CO would also convert to CO2, and finally much of the CO2would became carbonate rocks. Atmospheric Evolution Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Why have we just been discussing atmospheric change, when the subject is life? The problem for life is that oxidization removes the highly reduced molecules which are the ‘food’ for living organisms. E.g. the sugars used by the human body for energy are highly reduced molecules: we ‘burn’ them in our cells in the same way that we burn hydrocarbon gasoline in our cars. If all the food becomes oxidized, then the ‘free’ chemical energy source for early life is ended. What’s a bacterium to do? The answer is photosynthesis. This process connected life with solar power, enabling plants to manufacture food so long as the Sun shines. From that time on, life had evolved past being dependent on a reducing environment, and could weather the gradual transition to an oxidized one. Energy and Life Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System • We know from the geological record preserved on the Moon that a very heavy bombardment of the inner solar system was in progress between 3.9 and 4.2 billion years ago. At earlier times, the bombardment may have been even heavier - we do not know. • The Earth would have been pelted even more intensely than the Moon: why would this be? • The reasons are: • Greater cross-section of the Earth • Greater gravitational influence (‘focusing’) of the Earth. Late Heavy Bombardment Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System It is quite likely therefore that impactors as large as several hundred kilometers across were striking the Earth during this period: large enough to boil off all the oceans - for a time. After a few decades, the planet would have cooled enough to regain a hydrosphere. This would clearly have been a very inhospitable place for lifeforms to make their home! Without water, any lifeforms would probably have been wiped out: a full planet sterilization. This could have happened several times during the Earth’s early history. Early Impacts and Life Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: Karen Carr.com
ASTR 330: The Solar System At later times, life on Earth still had to contend with massive impacts making conditions difficult, but not impossible for life to continue. These were the mass extinction events: epochs when many species became extinct in a short time. Until the 1980s it was not realized that these events were due to impacts. • That all changed when the K/T extinction65 Myrs ago between the cretaceous and tertiary periods was positively linked to a giant impact - causing the Chicxulub crater in Mexico. • The first evidence for an asteroid impact was the high abundance of iridium in the boundary clays: rare on Earth, but more common in asteroids. Later Impacts Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: Levin, The Earth Through Time
ASTR 330: The Solar System K/T Extinction In the K/T extinction, more than half of all marine species at the time became extinct, along with many land animals, including the dinosaurs. 99% of the species which have lived on the planet are now extinct. We should be grateful: these impacts gave our ancestors a chance to take over! Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: Levin, The Earth Through Time
ASTR 330: The Solar System End Ordovician (~445 Ma); ~12% of families, ~ 65% species; large glaciation/sea level fall?? Late Devonian (~365 Ma); ~ 14% of families, ~ 72% species; impact (Siljan Crater)? End Permian (~250 Ma); ~ 52 % families, >90% species; impact (Bedout Crater)?; flood basalts (Siberia); one continent; global warming; low oxygen conditions. End Triassic (~210 Ma); ~ 12% families, ~ 65% species; impact (Manicouagan Crater); flood basalts (Central Atlantic) End Cretaceous (65 Ma); ~11% families, ~ 62% species; impact (Chixculub Crater); flood basalts (Deccan, India) Mass Extinctions (and possible causes) Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: Norm McLeod: Firstscience.com
ASTR 330: The Solar System • Let’s summarize the conditions which were occurring in the first few hundred million years of the Earth’s history: • Impacts: somehow life was able to take a foothold after the very largest (sterilizing impacts) ceased. • Secondary atmosphere formation: from impacts and outgassing from the interior. Enough atmospheric pressure to allow liquid water to exist at the prevailing temperature. • Chemical removal of CO2: enough removed to stop the runaway greenhouse effect from occurring, but enough remained to keep the planet warm enough for liquid water. • Escape of hydrogen: the gradual transformation of the atmosphere from reduced to oxidized: late enough for life to have already arisen, and developed photosynthesis. Summary So Far Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Now that we have some information on the conditions of the early Earth which made it a suitable habitat for life, we can ask the question: were Mars and/or Venus also habitable at some point in the distant past? Venus and Earth probably began with similar volatile inventories. However, Venus was close enough to the Sun for the runaway greenhouse effect to occur, destroying water. The best evidence for the destruction of water on Venus comes from the D/H ratio: the ratio of the heavy hydrogen isotope to the lighter (normal) isotope. D and H may both be found in the water molecule. In an earlier class we saw how the higher temperature of Venus could allow water to push through the tropopause (where water is trapped and condensed on the Earth) and thereby reach the upper atmosphere. At these levels, water is exposed to break-up by solar radiation. Comparing Earth and Venus Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System As water was photodissociated by sunlight in the upper atmosphere of Venus, H, D and O atoms would be produced. Hydrogen, being light, could then escape to space. Since H escapes much more readily than D, we expect to see an abnormally high D/H ratio on Venus if water has been destroyed this way. In fact, we do see a D/H ratio on Venus about 100 times higher than on the Earth. Without water, life could not have arisen on Venus. In the absence of water, extreme amounts of carbon dioxide would have remained in the atmosphere,ensuring the runaway greenhouse effect, and the high surface pressure and temperature. Venus, Water and Life Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System • We can turn the question of how we could detect life on other planets around, and ask how aliens could detect life on Earth, from a nearby planet. • There are three ways: • Radio or city-light emissions: only in the last hundred years would this be detectable. • Physical changes, I.e. vegetation. This would require extremely good telescopes, even for a nearby planet. • Atmosphere. Life on Earth as modified the atmosphere: green plants are responsible for the free oxygen in the Earth’s atmosphere, which would otherwise combine with rocks. Spectroscopy could have revealed life several billion years ago. Detecting Life on other Planets Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System The search for life on Mars was one of the major objectives of the Viking landers. Four experiments were carried. The first experiment was a GCMS: an instrument designed to look for organic molecules. None at all were found. The other three experiments attempted to look for the effects of biological metabolism: changes in gases in reaction vessels. You can read the details in the textbook. The upshot is that all the effects seen could be attributed to the unique properties of Martian soil. Control (sterilized) samples showed the same activity as unsterilized. Search For Life On Mars Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: Wayne County RESA
ASTR 330: The Solar System Since the late 1970s, the biggest debate about life on Mars was generated by the announcement in 1996 of possible microfossils inside a Martian meteorite. You will recall from our earlier class on meteorites that such pieces of Mars have definitely been identified amongst Antarcticmeteorite finds, due to analysis of trapped gases. The meteorite in question, ALH84001 is shown (left). This meteorite is 4 billion years old, dating from a time when liquid water was present, causing some sedimentary deposits. Martian Meteorites Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: NASA GSFC
ASTR 330: The Solar System The most spectacular, and controversial evidence of life, were photographs of purported ‘microfossils’ - minute structures 1/100 the width of a human hair. The main problem with these structures is the size: about the size of a virus on Earth, which cannot survive without access to the DNA of a bacterium. Martian Microfossils The other main strand of evidence which has not been adequately explained is the existence of chains of magnetite crystals: similar to the remains of magnetobacteria on Earth. There are possible non-biological explanations for this, so the case is still open. Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006 Picture credit: NASA GSFC
ASTR 330: The Solar System We believe that water was a likely requirement for life to evolve. How much water could once have been flowing on Mars? If we try to re-construct the ancient atmosphere of Mars, based on the ratios of noble gases to reactive gases today on Earth compared to Mars, we suspect that much of Mars’ volatiles have been lost, and in the ancient atmosphere was at least 0.07 bar. This is ten times the current atmosphere, but still 1000 times less than the volatile inventories of Venus and Earth. A CO2atmosphere of 0.07 bar should be accompanied by enough water to cover the planet to a depth of 9 m. However, this is much less than geologic evidence suggests: the outflow channels must have been carved by mighty flows, and equivalent depth of 1000 m! How to clear up this mystery? Water on Mars Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System The answer seem to lie in impact erosion. Mars is smaller than the Earth, and closer to the asteroid belt. Hence, impacts were both more likely to occur, and more likely to have enough energy to blast the atmosphere off into space. Calculations suggest that Mars could have had an original atmosphere 100-1000 times the current amount, most of which has been eroded by impacts large and small over geologic time. A test of this theory is to look for carbonate deposits: if the entire atmosphere was removed by impacts, then very little would be bound up in carbonate rocks (as on Earth). The search for carbonate rocks is currently a major quest for the Mars Exploration Rovers. Impacts on Mars Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Venus is too hot! Being 41 million km closer to the Sun was fatal to this world. The sunlight intensity is a factor of 2 higher than at the Earth, leading inevitably to the runaway greenhouse effect and the destruction of water. The main evidence for this scenario is the very high D/H ratio on Venus: showing that water was indeed destroyed. If we compare the volatile inventories of Venus and Earth, we see that they started with similar amounts of each gas. However, on Earth, most of the CO2was later bound up into rocks, and on Venus the water was destroyed. Summary: Venus Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System The problem with Mars is not that it is too far from the Sun, the main problem is that it is too small to resist impact erosion of atmospheric gases. In the past, Mars may have had a peak atmospheric density of 1-2 bars, of a CO2-N2 atmosphere, before 99% was lost to erosive impacts. This could have permitted a 0.9 km deep ocean, enough to cause the outflow channels we observe. The main challenge is to see if live arose briefly at some point in the past. About 3.5 billion years ago on Mars, conditions would have been favorable. At this time, life was certainly producing fossils on Earth. Summary: Mars Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System • What types of ‘raw materials’ were present on the early Earth for life to build with? What oxidation states were these chemicals in? • What was the Miller-Urey experiment, and what did it find? • What is an amino acid, and why are they significant? • Where have scientists found amino acids, other than on the Earth? What other organics have been found? • What are the two major traits of life? • What are the earliest records on life on Earth? • What other methods can we use, other than fossils, to trace the evolution of life on Earth? Quiz-Summary Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System What are (I) the three domains of living things (ii) the ‘last common ancestor’. What was the LCA probably like? What was the oxidation state of the early Earth’s atmosphere, and why was that important? How did it change over time? How was (i) CO2 (ii) hydrogen lost from the Earth’s atmosphere? What is photosynthesis? What was the role of impacts on life 4 billion years ago? What about 65 million years ago? Were all massextinctions due to impacts? What happened to water on Venus, and what evidence do we have for this? Quiz-Summary Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006
ASTR 330: The Solar System Why did the greenhouse effect on Venus runaway? What ways could we detect life on Earth, from the distance of a nearby planet? What did Viking find on Mars, as regards traces of life? What rock caused a controversy in 1996? Why? What happened to the atmosphere of Mars? What geologic evidence do we have for large amounts of water in the past on Mars? Could life have arisen on Mars in the past? When? Is it likely to be still there, dormant? Quiz-Summary Dr Conor Nixon Fall 2006