230 likes | 399 Views
New Remote Sensing Technologies. http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/about. NOAA’s Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) , located at the University of Wisconsin – Madison’s Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC). Forecasting Lake/Ocean Effect Snow.
E N D
New Remote Sensing Technologies http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/blog/about NOAA’s Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies(CIMSS), located at the University of Wisconsin – Madison’s Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC)
Forecasting Lake/Ocean Effect Snow • LOES are difficult phenomena to forecast: • Mesoscale temporal/spatial resolution • I can predict thunderstorms will occur but can’t tell you exactly where. • Standard rawinsonde network lacks spatial/temporal resolution to adequately sample/observe this phenomenon. • Onset, intensity, orientation, exact location very sensitive to wind direction and thermal stratification in the lower troposphere. • Operational NWP is still not sophisticated enough to simulate the air-sea interface and lower atmospheric processes or resolve the physical scale of the snowbands.
Forecasting Lake/Ocean Effect Snow • Empirical Forecast Rules Assess: • Localized Instability. • Depth of the mixed layer. • Ambient moisture of the airmass. • Wind direction and speed through mixed layer. • Then determine how long such conditions remain steady-state to sustain the snow band.
BUFKIT Guidance – Used at OSPC • Guidance product developed at NWSFO Buffalo that imports and displays hourly model sounding data from several models.
Brief History of NWP and LOES * Research Cloud Model Being Run at The University of Toronto
Model Resolution • It takes roughly 4 to 8 points to resolve a wave. • To resolve a 20km wide snowband: • 20km / 4 points ~ 5km horizontal model resolution. • Therefore, only the larger, single banded snows have any chance of being explicitly simulated by most operational NWP today.
Bua (2002) Outlined Success/Deficiency of a Mesoscale Model for a Single Band Event Using ETA-12km. • Precipitation deficiencies seen may result from: • Latent and sensible heat fluxes from Lake Erie that were lower than occurred because surface winds used to calculate the fluxes were too light. • Sensible Heat (temperature) Flux • Fs = rCDCp|V|(Tw-Ta) • Latent Heat (moisture) Flux • Fh= rCqLv|V|(qw-qa)
Model Wind - 250° at 10 ktsObserved Wind - 200° at 35 kts ETA Model Simulation Cloud Water and Surface Wind – Observed Wind From Bua, 2002 Green – observed wind Blue – Model Wind
ETA Model Simulation Results • General Precipitation Deficiencies Result From: • Eta-12 surface winds underforecast by up to 20 kts • Latent and sensible heat fluxes that are too low, perhaps by as much as a factor of 3. • The steady state single lake effect snow band will thus get too little moisture and heat from below, which will result in: • too little instability • too little convection • too little precipitation.
ETA Model Simulation Results • Additionally, convective scheme does not draw moisture out of the boundary layer. • Leaves it too moist and warm. • This reduces the vertical gradient of moisture and temperature, and thus even further reduces already low latent and sensible heat flux from the lake.
ETA Model Simulation Results • In spite of the physics limitations, the model captured the essence of the mesoscale circulation generated by the passage of cold air over Lake Erie. • We can conclude that the Eta-12 got synoptic/gross scale features of the mesoscale environment correct, since it predicted a single snow band.
REGIONAL-SCALE ENSEMBLE FORECASTSOF THE 7 FEBRUARY 2007 LAKE EFFECT SNOW EVENT Justin Arnott and Michael Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY Richard Grumm NOAA/NWS State College, PA
What is the Northeast Regional Ensemble? • 12 km Workstation WRF • 24 hr run length • 2007-2008: 8 Members • 2 CTP members • 1 Operational • Goal: Improve operational forecasts of lake effect snowfall
Northeast Ensemble Project • Case Study Conclusions • Suggests ensemble approach to LES may be valuable • Hone in on high-probability impact areas • Highlight outlier (low-probability) outcomes
Summary • NWP much improved but limited in abilities: • Initialization and data assimilation • Microphysics • Convective parameterization • Other factos • As a result, QPF and subsequently, snowfall forecasts are a tremendous challenge.
Summary • Better data initialization/assimilation, improved physics and other improvements will enhance our understanding and further the development of new and improved conceptual models. • Development of more local expertise (e.g., focal point meteorologists to build local guidance packages, do case studies, etc.) will also lead to improved forecasts.