180 likes | 265 Views
Probing Properties of the QCD Medium via Heavy Quark Induced Hadron Correlations. Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 June 26-28, 2008: 417. WE-Heraeus-Seminar. Thanks to Gang Wang and Shingo Sakai. Outline.
E N D
Probing Properties of the QCD Medium via Heavy Quark Induced Hadron Correlations Huan Zhong Huang Department of Physics and Astronomy University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095-1547 June 26-28, 2008: 417. WE-Heraeus-Seminar Thanks to Gang Wang and Shingo Sakai
Outline • PT Scale for Jet Energy Loss in QCD Medium • Non-photonic RAA and Bottom versus Charm • Is There a Clear Path-Length Effect in Eloss? • Mach Cone Effect for Heavy Quark Jet • v2 at High pT
pT Scales and Physical Processes RCP Three PT Regions: -- Fragmentation -- multi-parton dynamics (recombination or coalescence or …) -- Hydrodynamics (constituent quarks ? parton dynamics from gluons to constituent quarks? )
B and D contributions to electrons Non-photonic e RAA -- energy loss of HQ Experimental measurement of B and D contributions to non-photonic electrons ! Direct measurement of D and B mesons
PYTHIA X.Y. Lin, hep-ph/0602067 B D B vs D: contribution to non-photonic e pT_asso > 0.3 GeV/c PYTHIA shows significant differences in B&D on the near-side correlations in p+p collisions, and we can fit the experimental data to obtain B/D contribution.
B contribution to non-photonic e in p+p 200GeV Almost half-half B and D contributions to non-photonic e’s at 6 < pT < 9 GeV/c, and FONLL prediction is consistent with our data within errors.
Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 192301 RAA and B/D of non-photonic electrons p+p 200 GeV Central 0-5% Au+Au
Constraining RAA(B) and RAA(C) Theory Range M.Djordjevic, PLB632, 81 (2006) Prejudice or Reasonable expectation? Need to measure B/D in A+A collisions to determine RAA for B and C quarks! Heavy Flavor Trackers J. Thomas Talk
RAA(pT>6GeV/c) Almost pT Independent RAA=(Au+Au)/[Nbinaryx(p+p)] Empirical Implications for a constant RAA for pT > 6 GeV/c !!
Energy Loss Shifts pp pT to AA pT-DpT pp AA/Nbin DpT pT > 5 GeV/c For a power-law function (1+pT/a)-n a flat RAA DpT/pT constant ! What Physical Processes?
pT > 5 GeV/c Npart2/3 Npart Dependence of Energy Loss not used No significant difference in DpT/pT between light hadron and non-photonic electrons ! DpT/pT ~ 25% in most central collisions ! The physical origin of the N2/3 dependence? Linear Npart not bad either
Absence of Explicit Path Length Dependence not used The centrality dependence of DpT/pTcould be due to the initial energy density in collisions !
T. Hirano et al, Phys. Rev. C69, 034908 (2004) What Possible Physical Scenario for ELoss without L dependence ELoss of Partons: 1) Strong dependence on energy density 2) Rapid decrease of energy density in time interval < traversing time Hydrodynamic models show such a scenario plausible !
Path-Length Dependence in Soft Particles STAR 3<pTtrig<4GeV/c & 1.0<pTasso<1.5GeV/c 20-60% = associate - trigger (rad) Parallel: M. McCumber; O. Catu; H. Pei A. Feng; O. Barannikova; A. Adare At low pT region, the medium response to Parton ELoss -- has path-length dependence Caution: the current trigger pT is high enough to be in the dominant parton energy loss domain !
Non-photonic e-h azimuthal correlation trigger Uncertainty from ZYAM 0 – 20% most central Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV : pTtrig= 3-6 GeV/c; pTasso = 0.15-0.5 GeV/c Gang Wang (STAR) Direction representation STAR Preliminary Away Side in medium: How does B/D lose energy? Via conical emission? After v2 subtraction, the double-hump has a significance of 3~4 sigma. PYTHIA fit has a big chi2. On the away side, a broad structure or a possible double-hump feature has been observed, even before v2 subtraction.
Future Test of Path Length Dependence Precise value of v2 at pT > 6, 10 GeV/c ? RAA at pT > 10 GeV/c at RHIC should RAA approach unity at higher pT ? Future measurements will shed lights on possible physical scenarios for parton energy loss dynamics ! Heavy Quarks will be special -- Lorentz g dependence on parton ELoss on jet-medium interaction Mach cone formation?
Summary Parton Energy Loss Hadron PT Scale > 5-6 GeV/c Heavy Quarks (Charm/Bottom) Suffer Energy Loss -- Need Direct Charm/Bottom Measurement in A+A Absence of Clear Path-Length Dependence of ELoss -- Rapid Decrease of Energy Density with Evolution Time -- Need v2 Measurement at High pT (> 6 GeV/c) Jet-medium Interaction Induces Correlations in the Soft Particle Regime – Path-Length Dependent Possibly for Conic Shape Correlation Even for Heavy Quark Induced Jet-Medium Int.