1 / 1

KINETICS OF THE SELF-REACTION OF NEOPENTYL RADICALS Ksenia A. Loginova and Vadim D. Knyazev

Target. Signal Processing. PMT. Daly Detector. Exit Lens. Computer. Diffusion Pump. Diffusion Pump. KINETICS OF THE SELF-REACTION OF NEOPENTYL RADICALS Ksenia A. Loginova and Vadim D. Knyazev Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA.

darryl
Download Presentation

KINETICS OF THE SELF-REACTION OF NEOPENTYL RADICALS Ksenia A. Loginova and Vadim D. Knyazev

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Target Signal Processing PMT Daly Detector Exit Lens Computer Diffusion Pump Diffusion Pump KINETICS OF THE SELF-REACTION OF NEOPENTYL RADICALS Ksenia A. Loginova and Vadim D. Knyazev Department of Chemistry, The Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA neo-C5H11 + neo-C5H11 → C10H22 (1) • Introduction • Radical-radical reactions are among the very important elementary processes occurring in the oxidation and pyrolysis of hydrocarbons and substituted hydrocarbons. • Usually, although not without exceptions, these reactions serve as chain termination pathways. • In addition, radical-radical reactions represent pathways of molecular mass growth. Certain members of this class of reactions have been linked to formation of aromatic rings and polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), which leads, in turn, to production of soot in combustion systems. • In spite of the importance of these reactions, experimental information on them is rather sparse and, in many cases, controversial. • This lack of data is primarily due to the difficulties encountered in experimental studies of reactions between radicals. • Typical experimental difficulties encountered in studies of radical-radical reactions: • Often, radical sources create reactive byproducts that interfere with the kinetics of the reaction under study. • Exact knowledge of radical concentrations is needed for determination of rate constants. Errors in calibration of radical signal directly translate into errors in rate constants. • Experimental Method • Laser Photolysis / Photoionization Mass Spectrometry • Radicals are created via 193 nm laser photolysis of oxalyl chloride1 with subsequent fast conversion of the Cl atoms into neo-C5H11 radicals: • No photolysis byproducts interfere with the kinetics of the reaction under study. • Kinetics of radical decay and growth of products are monitored in real time using photoionization mass spectrometry. • Initial concentrations of radicals are obtained directly from real-time HCl signal profiles. • Kinetic mechanism in the experimental system: • Analytical solution for neopentyl radical signal: Typical ion signal (SC5H11), the corresponding reciprocal signal (1/SC5H11), and product (C10H22) profiles. Curvature of the 1/SC5H11 plot indicates the presence of heterogeneous loss of radicals with the first-order constant kw. Values of the k1[C5H11]0 product and kw are obtained from fitting the SC5H11 vs time profiles. The k1[neo-C5H11]0 vs [neo-C5H11]0 dependences obtained at different temperatures. Circles: bath gas density of 12.01016 molecule cm-3, squares: bath gas density of 3.01016 molecule cm-3. • h • (CClO)2 (oxalyl chloride)  2 Cl + 2 CO • Cl + neo-C5H12  HCl + neo-C5H11 Experimental Conditions: T = 300 – 500 K; [He] = (3 – 12)1016 ;[(CClO)2] = (2.5 – 18)1014 molecule cm-3; [neo-C5H12] = (2.4 – 8.7)1014 molecule cm-3; [neo-C5H11]0 = (2 – 14)1012 molecule cm-3. • Data Analysis • Kinetics of neo-C5H11 decay is studied at varied initial radical concentrations. • Values of the k1[neo-C5H11]0 product are obtained from fitting the [neo-C5H11] vs time profiles. • Initial concentrations of neo-C5H11 ([neo-C5H11]0) are determined from the real-time HCl profiles. • Fitted values of the k1[neo-C5H11]0 product are plotted as a function of [neo-C5H11]0 to ensure the absence of systematic deviations from linearity. • The values of k1 are obtained from the slopes of the k1[neo-C5H11]0 vs [neo-C5H11]0 dependences obtained at different temperatures. neo-C5H11 + neo-C5H11  C10H22 (bineopentyl) (k1) neo-C5H11 wall decay (kw) • Results • The room-temperature value of the rate constant ((1.63  0.36)10‑11 cm3 molecule‑1 s‑1) is in agreement with the value of (2.1  0.3)10‑11 cm3 molecule‑1 s‑1 obtained by Nielsen et al.2 • The rate constant demonstrates strong negative temperature dependence. • Comparison with data on other alkyl radical self-reactions: • There are the only three alkyl radical self-reactions for which directly determined temperature-dependent rate constants are available in the literature: self-reactions of methyl, ethyl, and cyclohexyl radicals. • Within the 300 – 500 K temperature range, the rate constant of neopentyl self-reaction decreases with temperature much faster than the rates of self-reactions of the two smaller radicals (CH3 and C2H5) but with a manner comparable with that of cyclohexyl radicals. • The difference between the temperature dependences of the rate constants of the self reactions of neopentyl and cyclehexyl radocals and those of methyl and ethyl radical is in general agreement with the observation by Klippenstein et al.3 that additional substituents at the radical center and increasing steric bulk of radicals result in stronger negative temperature dependences of their theoretically calculated recombination rate constants. Laser Photolysis / Photoionization Mass Spectrometry Apparatus k1(T) = 3.110‑12 exp(+506 K/T) ( 17 %) cm3 molecule‑1 s‑1 • References • 1. Baklanov, A. V.; Krasnoperov, L. N. J. Phys. Chem. A2001, 105, 97. • Nielsen, O. J.; Ellermann, T.; Wallington, T. J. Chem. Physl. Lett., 1993, 203, 302. • Klippenstein, S. J.; Georgievskii, Y.; Harding, L. B. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.2006, 8, 1133. Acknowledgment This research was supported by U.S. National Science Foundation, Combustion, Fire, and Plasma Systems Program under Grant No CBET-0853706.

More Related