1 / 67

Objectives of today’s session:

School Improvement Plan 2011-2012 Presented by the Accountability Department Broward County Public Schools. Objectives of today’s session: To prepare schools to complete the 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan

darva
Download Presentation

Objectives of today’s session:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. School Improvement Plan2011-2012Presented by the Accountability DepartmentBroward County Public Schools

  2. Objectives of today’s session: • To prepare schools to complete the 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan • To provide updates from Florida Department of Education in reference to School Improvement

  3. What’s New for 2011-2012? • The WORD template has not been released by the FDOE at this time. It will be posted to Broward’s School Improvement website as soon as we receive it. • We are recommending that you use the 2010-2011 WORD template as a guide. • Each school is required to use the online template for SIP submission to the state when it becomes available. • You must copy and paste information from the WORD document into the online template.

  4. Updates to the SIP Template Common Goal Section • When you have identified Anticipated Barriers, Strategies, etc. that are common across content areas and/or subgroups, you will be able to click on a button (“Common Goal Section”) and input the barrier, strategies, etc. and it will populate each goal you select. • After each goal section there is a view section link to allow printing just for that goal. • Last year’s school improvement plan will automatically rollover to the online template once it is released and you can edit the information for this year.

  5. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanTimeline for DA Schools, DJJ Sites, and DA Charter Schools • August 10, 2011: Online submission of DRAFT SIPs to Broward School Improvement website • August 11-26, 2011: District review of SIPs • September 2011: Schools revise SIPs per recommendations from Review Teams • September 21, 2011: Schools submit FINAL SIP & DA Checklist to Broward School Improvement Department • September 30, 2011: Final SIPs & DA Checklists due online to State and District. *Submit FINAL SIP & DA Checklist to Broward School Improvement Department (upload as pdf document to School Improvement website)

  6. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanTimeline for non-DA Schools • August 15, 2011: Online submission of DRAFT SIPs to Broward School Improvement website • September 12-September 19, 2011: District review of SIPs • September 2011: Schools revise SIPs per recommendations from Review Teams • October 14, 2011: Final SIPs & DA Checklists due online to State and District. *Submit FINAL SIP to Broward School Improvement Department (upload as pdf document to School Improvement website)

  7. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanSection 1: • School Information • SAC Chair – use present SAC chair’s name and make changes when a new SAC chair is chosen • Superintendent: List Interim Superintendent once hired (Sample: John Doe, Interim Superintendent) • Date of School Board Approval: December 6, 2011

  8. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanStudent Achievement Data: • School Grades Trend Data • Adequate Yearly Progress • FCAT Trend Data • The links will open in a separate browser window. • Longitudinal data (School Grades, AYP and FCAT) will be displayed in the print view of the SIP.

  9. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanHighly Qualified Administrators Include: • Position • Name • Degree(s)/Certification(s) • Number of years at Current School • Number of Years as an Administrator • Prior Performance Record • Schools Grades • FCAT Performance by Accountability Categories • AYP

  10. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanHighly Qualified Instructional Coaches Include: • Subject Area • Name • Degree(s)/Certification(s) • Number of Years at Current School • Number of Years as Coach • Prior performance • School Grades • FCAT Performance by Accountability Categories • AYP

  11. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanHighly Qualified Teachers • Describe school-based strategies used to recruit and retain highly qualified, high quality teachers to the school. • Include: • Description of Strategy • Person Responsible • Projected Completion Date

  12. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanNon-Highly Qualified Teachers • List all instructional staff who are teaching out-of-field and/or are NOT highly qualified. • It is required that all non-Title 1 DA schools have highly-qualified paraprofessionals, as defined by No Child Left Behind (NCLB), who instruct subgroups who did not make AYP. • Include: • Name • Certification (if any) • Teaching Assignment • PD/Support to become HQ

  13. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanStaff Demographics • Submit demographic information about instructional staff in the school. • Include any staff teaching at least one academic course. • Include: • Total Number of Instructional Staff • % of First-Year Teachers • % of Teachers with 1-5 Years of Experience • % of Teachers with 6-14 Years of Experience • % of Teachers with 15+ Years of Experience • % of Teachers with Advanced Degrees • % Highly Qualified • % Reading Endorsed Teachers • % National Board Certified Teachers • % ESOL Endorsed When using percentages, include the number of teachers the percentage represents (e.g. 70% (35)).

  14. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanTeacher Mentoring Program • Describe the school’s teacher mentoring program. • Include: • Mentor Name • Mentee Assigned • Rationale for Pairing • Planned Mentoring Activities

  15. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanCoordination and Integration (Title I Schools Only) • Describe how federal, state and local services and programs will be coordinated and integrated in the school. (See Technical Assistance document for sample information.) • Include:

  16. Florida’s Three Tier Model

  17. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanResponse to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) • School-based RtI Team • Identify the school-based RtI Leadership Team • Indicate who is on the team and their position. • Describe how the school-based RtI Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions). How does it work with other school teams to organize/coordinate efforts? • Explain when the team meets and what the focus will be. • Consider the number and functions of other teams in your school.

  18. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanResponse to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) • Describe the role of the school-based RtI Leadership Team in the development and implementation of the School improvement Plan. Describe how the RtI Problem Solving process is used in the development and implementation of the SIP. • The RtI team will work collaboratively with the SAC team to assist in the development and implementation of the SIP. • Identify Problem • Analyze Data • Develop and implement Intervention Plan • Evaluate effectiveness

  19. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanResponse to Instruction/Intervention (RtI) • RtI Implementation • Describe the data management system used to summarize tiered data. • How will data be analyzed to evaluate core instruction? targeted group interventions? individual student interventions? • Behavior data can be accessed in the Data Warehouse under the Discipline Reports Folder • Describe the plan to train staff on RtI.

  20. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanLiteracy Leadership Team • Identify the school-based Literacy Leadership Team • Indicate who is on the team and their position. • Explain why they have been included on the team. • Describe how the school-based Literacy Leadership Team functions (e.g. meeting processes and roles/functions) • Explain when the team will meet and what the focus will be. • Describe the major initiatives of the school-based Literacy Leadership Team for this year • Explain how the Literacy Leadership Team will contribute to increase student literacy

  21. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanNCLB School Choice Notification letters • SINI Status • SINI 1+ schools • SES Option • SINI 1+ schools • Choice With Transportation (CWT) Option • SINI 2+ schools • SINI Status and CWT notifications may be same letter

  22. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanPre-School Transition • Describe plans for assisting preschool children in transition from early childhood programs to local elementary school programs as applicable. • Examples are provided for you as part of the Technical Assistance Document located on the Broward’s School Improvement Website.

  23. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanLiteracy Leadership Team For schools with Grades 6-12: Describe the plan to ensure all teachers incorporate reading instruction in all classes.

  24. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan*High Schools Only • How does the school incorporate applied and integrated courses to help students see the relationships between subjects and relevance to their future? • How does the school incorporate students’ academic and career planning, as well as promote student course selections, so that students’ course of study is personally meaningful?

  25. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanPostsecondary Transition • Describe strategies for improving student readiness for the public postsecondary level based on annual analysis. • Use High School Feedback Report http://data.fldoe.org/readiness/

  26. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Chart for Goals

  27. What is the Problem? Why is it happening? Did it work? What should be done about it? Applying Problem Solving When Identifying Anticipated Barriers for SIP Goals National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Inc. (2006)

  28. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanProblem Solving Process to Increase Student Achievement • Anticipated Barriers • Barriers must be aligned with the areas that need improvement. • Strategy • Define the strategy that the school will implement to ensure the expected level of performance is met. • Person or Position Responsible for Monitoring • Identify the person or position who will be responsible to ensure the strategy is implemented. • Process Used to Determine Effectiveness of Strategy • Describe the process that will be used to determine if the strategy is effective. • Evaluation Tool • Describe/Name the assessment tool.

  29. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements – Guiding Questions • Guiding questions are available in all areas where levels of performance are required. • Guiding questions will be located in the Technical Assistance Guide that will be provided by the FDOE School Improvement Bureau.

  30. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanFCIM – Plan and Do • Embed the answers into the Strategies to overcome anticipated barriers. • Guiding questions to inform the problem solving process: • Which reporting categories/strands, by grade level, showed a decrease in proficiency? • How will the Instructional Focus Calendar be created to address area(s) of improvement (reporting categories/strands)? • How will focus lessons be developed and revised to increase and maintain proficiency for these reporting categories/strands?

  31. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanFCIM – Studying to Monitor Progress • Guiding Questions to Inform the Problem Solving Process • In addition to the baseline and mid-year assessment, how often will interim or mini-assessments/writing prompts be administered? • How often will teachers and the leadership team (principal, assistant principal, instructional coaches) meet to analyze data, problem solve, and redirect the instructional based on the academic needs of students? • How often will data chats be held at each of the following levels: teacher/student; teacher/administration?

  32. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanRtI: Making Necessary Adjustments • Embed RtI into the strategies: • How are you making decisions based on RtI data (at Tier 1 through data chats; at Tiers 2 & 3 through the Intervention Records and progress monitoring graphs • How are you systematically collecting these data using appropriate methods and documents? • Evaluation measures include: improvements in student achievement, reductions of student behavior incidents, and reductions in referral rates for ESE students.

  33. Reading Goal

  34. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Expected ImprovementsGoals: Reading • Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in Reading • Based on 2011 FCAT data, what percentage of students achieved proficiency (FCAT Level 3)? • What are the anticipated barriers to increasing the percentage of students maintaining proficiency (FCAT Level 3)? • For students scoring FCAT Levels 1 or 2, what strategies will be implemented to provide remediation and increase achievement to proficiency (FCAT Level 3)? • For students scoring FCAT Level 3, what strategies will be implemented to maintain proficiency and/or increase achievement to above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5)?

  35. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Expected ImprovementsGoals: Reading 2. Students achieving above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in Reading • Based on 2011 FCAT data, what percentage of students achieved above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5)? • What are the anticipated barriers to increasing the percentage of students scoring FCAT Levels 4 or 5 on the 2012 FCAT? • For students scoring FCAT Level 3, what strategies will be implemented to maintain proficiency and/or increase achievement to above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5)? • For students scoring FCAT Levels 4 or 5, what strategies will be implemented to maintain above proficiency, performance, and provide enrichment?

  36. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Expected ImprovementsGoals: Reading 3. Percentage of students making Learning Gains in Reading • Did the percentage of students making Learning Gains increase or decrease from 2010 to 2011? • What are the anticipated barriers for making Learning Gains by improving performance or maintaining proficiency at FCAT Levels 3, 4 or 5 on the 2012 FCAT? • For students scoring FCAT Levels 1 or 2, what strategies will be implemented to provide remediation and increase achievement to proficiency (FCAT Level 3)? • For students scoring FCAT Level 3, what strategies will be implemented to maintain proficiency and/or increase achievement to above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5)? • For students scoring FCAT Levels 4 or 5, what strategies will be implemented to maintain above proficiency and provide enrichment?

  37. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Expected ImprovementsGoals: Reading 4. Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in Reading • What percentage of students in the lowest 25% made learning gains? • What was the percent increase or decrease in the lowest 25% of students making learning gains? • What are the anticipated barriers to increasing learning gains in the lowest 25%? • What additional supplemental interventions/remediation will be provided for students in the lowest 25% not achieving learning gains?

  38. 2011-2012 School Improvement Plan Expected ImprovementsGoals: Reading • Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in Reading • Ethnicity b. ELL • SWD d. Economically Disadvantaged • Which student subgroups did not meet AYP targets? • What are the anticipated barriers to increasing the number of subgroups making AYP? • What strategies will be used to ensure students make AYP?

  39. Mathematics Goal

  40. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected ImprovementsGoal: Mathematics • Students achieving proficiency (Level 3) in Mathematics • Students achieving above proficiency (Levels 4 and 5) in Mathematics • Percentage of students making Learning Gains in Mathematics • Percentage of students in Lowest 25% making learning gains in Mathematics • Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) • Ethnicity c. SWD • ELL d. Economically Disadvantaged Guiding questions for Mathematics refer to Levels (not FCAT) because EOC exams will be reported with Level scores.

  41. Science Goal

  42. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Science • Students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) in Science • Based on 2011 FCAT data, what percentage of students achieved proficiency (FCAT Level 3)? • What are the anticipated barriers to students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) on the 2012 FCAT? • What benchmarks/strands, by grade level, showed non-proficiency? • How will the Instructional Focus Calendar be created to address areas of improvement (benchmark(s)/strand(s))? • How will focus lessons be developed and revised to increase and maintain proficiency for these benchmarks/strands?

  43. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Science 2. Students achieving above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 and 5) in Science • What are the anticipated barriers to students achieving proficiency (FCAT Level 3) or above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5) on the 2012 FCAT? • Based on 2011 FCAT data, what percentage of students achieved above proficiency (FCAT Levels 4 or 5)? • What benchmarks/strands, by grade level, showed non-proficiency? • How will the Instructional Focus Calendar be created to address areas of improvement (benchmark(s)/strand(s))? • How will focus lessons be developed and revised to increase and maintain proficiency for these benchmarks/strands?

  44. Writing Goal

  45. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Writing • Students achieving proficiency (FCAT 4.0-6.0) in Writing • Based on the 2011 FCAT, did the school demonstrate an increase or a decrease (4.0 and above) compared to 2010 FCAT? • How will the Instructional Focus Calendar be created to address areas of improvement for writing skills (focus, organization, support, elaboration, and conventions)? • How will focus lessons be developed and revised to increase and maintain writing scores? • Once baseline writing prompts are administered at the beginning of the school year, determine strengths and weaknesses of performance on one type of prompt vs. the other. • What is the process for providing feedback to students to allow for revisions, editing, and publishing?

  46. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Writing 2. Student subgroups not making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in Writing a. Ethnicity b. ELL c. SWD d. Economically Disadvantaged • Based on 2011 FCAT data, what percentage of students achieved Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP - 3.0 and higher)? • What are the anticipated barriers to students achieving AYP subgroups on the 2012 FCAT? • Which student subgroups did not achieve AYP targets on the 2011 FCAT? • What strategies will be used to ensure students achieve AYP on the 2012 Writing FCAT?

  47. Attendance SuspensionDropout Prevention Goals

  48. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Attendance Based on 2010-2011 data posted in DWH Reports Folder after the last day of the school year. • Average Daily Attendance (ADA) • Number of Students with Excessive Absences (10 or more) • Number of Students with Excessive Tardies (10 or more)

  49. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Attendance • What was the attendance rate for 2010-2011? • How many students had excessive absences (10 or more) during the 2010-2011 school year? • What are the anticipated barriers to decreasing the number of students with excessive absences? • What strategies and interventions will be utilized to decrease the number of students with excessive absences for 2011-2012? • How many students had excessive tardies (10 or more) during the 2010-2011 school year? • What are the anticipated barriers to decreasing the number of students with excessive tardies? • What strategies and interventions will be utilized to decrease the number students with excessive tardies for 2011-2012?

  50. 2011-2012 School Improvement PlanExpected Improvements Goals: Suspension Based on 2010-2011 data posted in DWH Reports Folder after the last day of school. • Total Number of In-school Suspensions • Total Number of Students with In-school Suspensions • Total Number of Out-of-school Suspensions • Total Number of Students Suspended Out-of-school

More Related