370 likes | 544 Views
State of the Audit Profession. Virginia Accounting & Auditing Conference Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA. Agenda. How did we get to where we are today? The provisions and implications of Sarbanes-Oxley The cascade effect – what’s the next front? Honoring our heritage and moving forward
E N D
State of the Audit Profession Virginia Accounting & Auditing Conference Presented by Chuck Landes, CPA
Agenda • How did we get to where we are today? • The provisions and implications of Sarbanes-Oxley • The cascade effect – what’s the next front? • Honoring our heritage and moving forward • Overview of significant assurance initiatives
What went wrong – corporate culture and reporting model • Simple greed or arrogance • Market pressure on short term earnings • Lack of transparency or timely disclosures in the reporting model • Lack of mandated disclosures on management’s accounting policies • Too many rules leading to connect the dots accounting and auditing
What went wrong – the work of auditors • Some auditors did not step up to their responsibilities • Some auditors assumed good intent on part of management • Inherent weaknesses in our disciplinary and monitoring processes • Auditor dependency on fees from major clients
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Oversight Board • New Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) • Requires 2 CPAs (but only 2) to serve • Power to set auditing rules, inspect firms and discipline wrongdoers • Funding from accounting firms and registrants
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Standards Setting • PCAOB has authority to “adopt, amend, modify, repeal or reject” standards • Includes provisions for SEC oversight, governance and funding of FASB
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Independence/Scope of Services • Proscribes eight specific services to public company audit clients • Gives PCAOB authority to prohibit others • Other nonaudit services not banned must be pre-approved by audit committee
Bookkeeping Information systems design and implementation Appraisals or valuation services Actuarial services Internal audits Broker/dealer and investment banking services Legal or expert services related to audit services Management and human resources services Other services as determined by the board The Sarbanes - Oxley Act: Banned Services
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Liability Concerns • Statute of limitations extended to 5 years from occurrence or 2 from discovery • No specific language on non-preclusive effect
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Report on Internal Controls • Requires auditor report on internal controls assertions • Must be part of audit - not separate engagement
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Corporate Governance • Mandates audit committee oversight of audits • Requires CEO/CFO certification of reports • Prison terms of up to 10 years for senior executives
The Sarbanes - Oxley Act:Workpaper Retention • Auditors to retain documents in support of report for 7 years. • 5 yr retention requirement under “criminal fraud accountability”
Sarbanes/Oxley Projects • Internal control task force • Focus on reporting on internal controls over financial reporting as part of the annual audit • Audit committee task force • Focus on relationship and communications
Sarbanes/Oxley Projects • Omnibus task force • Documentation retention • Concurring partner review • Foreign affiliate issues • Representation and attorney letter amendments • Q.C. Task Force • Focus on inspection/monitoring guidance • Audit partner rotation • Objectivity issues
Possible Cascade at Federal Level • DOL rules for ERISA Audits • Banking Regulators • Future Action from the GAO • Public Interest Entity – A concept that may be coming
Senate’s Attempt to Address State Issue • The bill says that state regulators: “Should make an independent determination of the proper standards applicable” in supervising nonregistered accounting firms. • Standards applied by the Board “should not be presumed to be applicable” for small and medium sized firms
Overview of the Potential Impact • New rules could require mandatory rotation of all partners on audit engagements. • New auditor responsibility for “testing” issuers’ compliance with laws and reporting on “potential” violations. • The new Board could have the authority to enforce securities laws, duplicating SEC’s powers. • State legislative/regulatory proposals could “pile on” and/or conflict with Federal laws.
A Revitalized Accounting Culture • What is needed is not just legislation but a revitalized accounting culture • Build upon the profession’s traditional values • A rigorous commitment to integrity • A passion for getting it right • A commitment to rules and a zeal for applying them • Zero tolerance for those who break them
Getting the Right Answer • We are at a serious juncture in the history of our financial markets and our profession • Anyone who deceives investors must be held accountable • Regulators should have all the resources they need to police the capital markets and enforce the law • Investors must have information that is accurate, clear, timely and relevant • The reputation of the CPA profession must be restored and our proud heritage honored
Honoring our heritage and moving forward • We need to reaffirm our basic commitment to professionalism • Auditors must be willing to say NO • Every day, auditors everywhere are telling a corporate exec what must be disclosed, why a transaction can’t be treated in a certain fashion and why certain activity must be reflected on the balance sheet • “Trust, but verify,” this is the true spirit of the profession
What saying NO means • Rejecting unsound corporate accounting practices • Reducing the risk of deceit and fraud through diligent inquiry • Ensuring that audited statements are not just accurate, but illuminating • Questioning management, challenging management • When justified – rejecting management’s accounting decisions
Recently Issued Standards • SAS No. 95, Generally Accepted Auditing Standards • SAS No. 96, Audit Documentation • SSAE No. 11, Attest Documentation • SAS 97, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles • SAS 98, Omnibus 2002
The ASB’s Current Agenda • Fraud • Risk Assessments • Fair Value • SAS No. 71(Quarterly Reviews of SEC Entities) • Joint Task Force on Quality Control • Sarbanes/Oxley related projects • Horizons II
Horizons II Task Force • Strategic group looking at direction of ASB and auditing standards over next 3 – 5 years • Will continue to include convergence with international auditing standards • Explore expanding auditor’s communication • Explore whether “reasonable assurance” is the proper level of assurance with respect to the auditor’s responsibility to plan and detect material errors.
Working with Corporate America • AICPA to convene anti-fraud summit with corporate leaders, accountants and market professionals • Will partner with corporations to design and establish anti-fraud controls and programs. • Will created enhanced attestation standards for CPAs to report on corporate anti-fraud programs
Research • AICPA to sponsor academic research into the who, what, when, where & why of fraud • AICPA will establish an Institute for Fraud Studies with the University of Texas and Association of Certified Fraud Examiners
Education & Training • AICPA will develop training programs to prevent fraud • AICPA to work with academia on anti-fraud curricula and materials • AICPA calling for members to more anti-fraud CPE • AICPA urges stock exchanges to mandate anti-fraud education for corporate managers and directors
Advancing Financial Reporting • AICPA to initiate a dialogue on differentiating reporting needs of private vs. public companies • Will work with FASB on more timely and better quality reporting – particularly for off balance sheet, intangibles & liquidity • AICPA is co-sponsoring Value Measurement & Reporting Collaborative • AICPA supports more disclosure of accounting policies and estimates and reporting in Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Corporate Governance • AICPA calls for revision of auditing standards to provide public notice of internal control weaknesses • Reportable conditions to include: • One person as Chair and as CEO • Audit committee that is not fulfilling its mission. • It may include lack of mandatory anti-fraud education, or lack of a Code of Conduct
Conclusion -- Moving Forward • Core values and traditional areas. • Building on what we do best and what the public needs us to do. • Wrestle with such key issues as reporting measures, transparency, fraud responsibility, dependency, etc. • Address state issues • Enhance the public’s perception of our profession
What the AICPA Will Do • Continue to communicate with you • Work to keep the profession together • Work to assist with the implementation of this new regulatory structure • Provide you with the assistance to deal with the Legislative/Regulatory issues in your State