1 / 27

Presentation to: XV REGIONAL SEMINAR OF FISCAL POLICY CEPAL/ECLAC, United Nations

Presentation to: XV REGIONAL SEMINAR OF FISCAL POLICY CEPAL/ECLAC, United Nations Santiago de Chile, 27-30 January 2003 ______________________ FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN CANADA Dr. T. Russell Robinson Ottawa Canada.

dasan
Download Presentation

Presentation to: XV REGIONAL SEMINAR OF FISCAL POLICY CEPAL/ECLAC, United Nations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Presentation to: XV REGIONAL SEMINAR OF FISCAL POLICY CEPAL/ECLAC, United Nations Santiago de Chile, 27-30 January 2003 ______________________ FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION IN CANADA Dr. T. Russell Robinson Ottawa Canada

  2. FORUM OF FEDERATIONS______________________________________________________ • “AN INTERNATIONAL NETWORK THAT SEEKS TO STRENGTHEN DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE BY PROMOTING DIALOGUE ON AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE VALUES, PRACTICES, PRINCIPLES, AND POSSIBILITIES OF FEDERALISM “ _________________________________________________________________________________ • BEGAN IN OTTAWA, CANADA, AND IN 1999 ESTABLISHED AS A PERMANENT INSTITUTION TO HELP IMPROVE THE PRACTICE OF FEDERALISM WORLDWIDE • HAS BOARD OF DIRECTORS FROM NIGERIA, INDIA, GERMANY, SWITZERLAND, BRAZIL AND CANADA, AND PARTICIPATION IS GROWING • CLEARING HOUSE FOR INFORMATION & RESOURCES ON PRACTICE OF FEDERALISM • PROVIDES POLICY & PROGRAM ASSISTANCE TO GOVERNMENTS • FOCUS ON EDUCATION, INFORMATION-SHARING, & MULTILATERAL, COMPARATIVE ACTIVITIES PLEASE CONSULT:www.forumfed.org

  3. 2 OVERVIEW OF CANADA (Date of entry into Confederation) Share of present-day population of 31.1 million (1999) 0.1% (1949) 1.8% (1898) 0.1% (1870) 0.1% (1871) 13.2% (1905) 9.7% (1867) 24.1% (1905) 3.4% (1870) 3.8% (1867) 37.8% (1873) 0.5% (1867) 3.1% (1867) 2.5%

  4. 3 DIVISION OF POWERS_______________________________ • Federal and provincial governments have independent constitutional basis of authority • (Municipalities receive their powers & responsibilities from the provincial govts) • Few / no constraints on provincial spending / taxation powers or ability to borrow • Federal and provincial govts have extensive areas of separate legislative powers • Strong executive and bureaucratic capacity at federal, provincial & municipal levels

  5. 4 CONSTITUTIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES_________________________ FEDERAL PROVINCIAL Money and Banking  International Trade  Airlines  Railways  Foreign Affairs  Defence  Employment Insurance  Pensions  Immigration  Agriculture  Industry  Education  Health  Municipal Institutions  Social Welfare  Police  Natural Resources  Highways 

  6. 5 Provincial spending pressures Federal spending pressures SPENDING AREAS & PRESSURES________________________ • Few concurrent powers (agriculture, pensions, immigration, industry) • Residual power lies with federal level • Much interdependence in practice • areas where jurisdiction is not clear or overlaps • through use of the spending power and transfers to provinces Health Care Education Social services Security and national defence Senior’s, Aboriginals R & D and Skills Transfers to Provinces (Health)

  7. 6 ACCESS TO REVENUE SOURCES______________________ Federal Provincial Personal Income Taxes  Corporate Income Taxes  Sales Taxes  Payroll Taxes  Resource Royalties  Gaming, Liquor Profits  Property Taxes  Customs Import Duties  Taxes on Non-Residents 

  8. 7 Common revenue sources Federal Provincial Personal income tax Corporate income taxSales taxesPayroll taxes Provincial-only revenue sources Federal Provincial Gambling, sale of alcoholProperty taxesNatural resource revenues Federal-only revenue sources Federal Provincial Customs tariffs and import dutiesTaxes on non-residents ACCESS TO REVENUES, CONTINUED_______________________ • Traditional tax basesare shared by Ottawa and the provinces • Provincial-only tax bases are growing • Federal-only tax basesare small and volatile

  9. 8 TAX COLLECTION AGREEMENTS_______________________ Main tax fields: • personal income tax • corporate income tax • sales tax Federal government and many provincial governments have entered into Tax Collection Agreements covering each of the three main tax fields

  10. 9 CANADIAN DECENTRALIZATION:FISCAL TRENDS_______________________________ REVENUES (% OF GDP) EXPENDITURES (% OF GDP) Provinces Provinces Federal Transfers Federal Transfers Federal Federal

  11. 10 DECENTRALIZATION: INTERNATIONAL COMPARISONS_________________________________________________ FEDERAL SHARE OF DIRECT SPENDING (1998) FEDERAL SHARE OF TAX REVENUES (1998) Sources: World Bank, Fiscal Decentralization Indicators, March 2001 (based on IMF’s Government Finance Statistics), Inter-American Development Bank

  12. 11 CANADA’S THREE MAJOR TRANSFER PROGRAMS__________________________________________________ CANADA HEALTH AND SOCIAL TRANSFER (CHST) • Block Grant[C$ 35.7 B] • Health, PSE, social services EQUALIZATION [C$ 10.3 B] • Unconditional • Comparable services at comparable tax rates TERRITORIAL FORMULA FINANCING (TFF) • Targeted to three northern territories[C$ 1.3 B] 2002-03 VALUES

  13. 12 HORIZONTAL EQUITY AND CANADIAN FISCAL EQUALIZATION________________________ • The Government of Canada has the constitutional responsibility to reduce fiscal disparities between provinces • Post-Equalization revenue raising capacity still higher in more prosperous provinces (e.g. Alberta’s oil resources contribute to its 60% above average fiscal capacity) • Inter-provincial tax competition - smaller provinces have difficulty keeping pace

  14. 13 Post-Equalization fiscal capacity: ~ C$ 5,900 / capita, or 96% of national average HOW EQUALIZATION WORKS________________________________________ EQUALIZATION PAYMENTS PROVINCIALFISCALCAPACITY

  15. 14 CANADIAN TRANSFERS MOSTLY UNCONDITIONAL_____________________________________________________ Shared-cost/high-conditionality transfers (% of total transfers) Canada, 1945-1999

  16. 15 CANADIAN PROVINCES RELATIVELY “REVENUE INDEPENDENT”______________________________________________ Federal transfers as a % of total revenues of other levels of government INTERNATIONAL CANADIAN PROVINCES Sources: World Bank, Fiscal Decentralization Indicators, March 2001 (based on IMF’s Government Finance Statistics); Finance Canada; IADB

  17. 16 PROVINCIAL CONTROL OF REVENUES___________________________________________ Constituent units’ control over their tax bases and tax rates (% of their own-source revenue)

  18. 17 Own-source revenues as % of total provincial-local revenues 88% 87% 82% 82% 81% 70% 61% 59% 56% 22% ACCESS TO REVENUES: PROVINCIAL FISCAL AUTONOMY___________________________________________ Canada Canada, 1945-2000 International, latest available data 90 ---------------------------------------- Belgium 85 ---------------------------------------- Malaysia Germany % Switzerland 80 ---------------------------------------- U.S. India 75 ---------------------------------------- Australia Austria 70 ---------------------------------------- Spain 1945 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 2000 0 25 50 75 100 Year %

  19. 18 PROVINCIAL ACCESS TO REVENUES_________________________________________Federal and provincial revenues (% of GDP) All provinces Forecast Federal

  20. 19 25% 20% Federal and provincial program spending (% of GDP) 15% 10% 1980-81 1982-83 1984-85 1986-87 1988-89 1990-91 1992-93 1994-95 1996-97 1998-99 2000-01 Provincial Federal PROGRAM EXPENDITURES HIGHLY CONSTRAINED

  21. 20 FISCAL RECOVERY IN LATE 1990s _________________________________________________ Federal and provincial governments fiscal balance% of GDP (1981-82 to 2001-02)

  22. 21 SUMMING UP_________________________________________________ • Comparatively speaking: Canada is a highly decentralized federation • Sub-national governments control their own revenues • Transfers are relatively minor (on average) and are mostly unconditional • Current pressures on social programs (health, education) cause demands for greater transfers (vertical balance debates) • The challenge of horizontal balance also continues, especially for poorer provinces & territories

  23. ANNEX CANADA’S TAX COLLECTION AGREEMENTS

  24. A1 TAX COLLECTION AGREEMENTS (TCAs)______________________________________ • Since 1962 joint occupancy of income tax field in a coordinated manner. • Agreements with 9 provinces and 3 territories for personal income tax. • Agreements with 7 provinces and 3 territories for corporate income tax.

  25. A2 TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF TCAs______________________________________________ • The federal government agrees to: – collect and administer provincial personal and corporate income taxes – pay provinces the value of income tax assessed, and – provide this service at very small cost • Provincial governments agree to use the federal definition of taxable income, thus ensuring a common tax base

  26. A3 ADMINSTRATION OF TCAs______________________________________ Three departments involved: • Department of Finance Canada is responsible for policy matters and for paying provinces their share of assessed income taxes • The Canada Customs and Revenue Agency collects, assesses, audits and enforces provincial legislation • The Auditor General of Canada conducts an audit annually of the tax collection account

More Related