440 likes | 598 Views
CSCI260 Database Applications. Database Administration Part 1. Chapter Six. Chapter Objectives. Understand the need for and importance of database administration Learn different ways of processing a database Understand the need for concurrency control, security, and backup and recovery
E N D
CSCI260 Database Applications Database AdministrationPart 1 Chapter Six
Chapter Objectives • Understand the need for and importance of database administration • Learn different ways of processing a database • Understand the need for concurrency control, security, and backup and recovery • Learn typical problems that can occur when multiple users process a database concurrently • Understand the use of locking and the problem of deadlock Understand the use of locking and the problem of deadlock
Chapter Objectives (continued) • Learn the difference between optimistic and pessimistic locking • Know the meaning of ACID transaction • Learn the four 1992 ANSI standard isolation levels • Understand the need for security and learn a generalized model of database security • Know the difference between DBMS and application security • Know the difference between recovery via reprocessing and recovery via rollback/rollforward
Chapter Objectives (continued) • Understand the nature of the tasks required for recovery using rollback/rollforward • Know basic administrative and managerial DBA functions
Database Processing Environment • A database processing environment is complicated and multi-faceted • Multiple users • Multiple queries • Multiple forms • Multiple reports • Multiple application programs
Processing Constraints • Enforcing referential integrity • Cascading deletion • Cascading modifications • Data type constraints • Data size constraints • Data value constraints • Null constraints • Uniqueness constraints
Internet Application Processing • Internet Application Processing is more complicated than traditional application processing • Specifically, with Internet Application Processing … • The network becomes an integral part of the application
Stored Procedures • A stored procedure is a module similar to subroutine or function that performs database actions • Stored in the database itself • Can pass it parameters, receive results • Written in PL/SQL (oracle), TRANSACT-SQL (SQL Server)
Triggers • A trigger is a stored procedure that is automatically invoked by the DBMS when a specified activity occurs • BEFORE, AFTER and INSTEAD OF
Control, Security and Reliability • Possible to have many database functions occurring at the same time • Three necessary database administration functions • Concurrency control • Security • Backup and Recovery
Concurrency Control • Concurrency control ensures that one user’s actions do not adversely impact another user’s actions • At the core of concurrency is accessibility. In one extreme, data becomes inaccessible once a user touches the data. This ensures that data that is being considered for update is not shown. In the other extreme, data is always readable. The data is even readable when it is locked for update.
Concurrency Control (continued) • Interdependency • Changes required by one user may impact others • Concurrency • People or applications may try to update the same information at the same time • Record retention • When information should be discarded
Need for Atomic Transactions • A database operation typically involves several transactions. These transactions are atomic and are sometimes called logical units of work (LUW). • Before an operation is committed to the database, all LUWs must successfully complete. If one or more LUW is unsuccessful, a rollback is performed and no changes are saved to the database.
Need for Atomic Transactions • Example: Sequence required when recording new order. • 1. Change the customer record, increasing value of amount owed. • 2. Change the salesperson record, increasing the value of Commission Due. • 3. Insert new order record into the database. If last one fails, roll back all three
Lost Update Problem • If two or more users are attempting to update the same piece of data at the same time, it is possible that one update may overwrite another update.
Concurrency Issues • Concurrency issues common – have standardized names… • Dirty reads • The transaction reads a changed record that has not been committed to the database • Example: One transaction reads row changed by a second transaction. Second transaction later cancels (rollsback) its changes
Concurrency Issues • Inconsistent reads/Non-repeatable read • The transaction re-reads a data set and finds that the data has changed • Phantom reads • The transaction re-reads a data set and finds that a new record has been added Fix some of these issues with Resource Locking
Resource Locking • To avoid concurrency issues, resource locking will disallow transactions from reading, modifying, and/or writing to a data set that has been “locked” • Prevent sharing of data • Transactions can use a lock command
Implicit versus Explicit Resource Locking • Implicit locks are issued automatically by the DBMS based on an activity • Explicit locks are issued by users requesting exclusive rights to the data
Lock Granularity • Size of lock has different impacts • Large Granularity lock • e.g. lock entire table • easy for DBMS to administer • Frequently cause conflicts • Smaller Granularity lock • E.g. lock row • Harder for DBMS to administer (lots of details) • Fewer conflicts
Lock Types • Exclusive Lock • Locks an item from access of any type • No other transaction can read or change the data • Shared lock • Locks an item from being changed • Item can still be read, just can’t alter it
Serializable Transactions (Two-Phased Locking) • Two-phased locking, whereby locks are obtained as they are needed • A growing phase, whereby the transaction continues to request additional locks • A shrinking phase, whereby the transaction begins to release the locks
Serializable Transactions Example • Order-entry transaction that involves processing data in CUSTOMER, SALESPERSON and ORDER tables. • Transaction issues locks on all three tables • Makes all the database changes • Releases all its locks
Deadlock • As a transaction begins to lock resources, it may have to wait for a particular resource to be released by another transaction • On occasions, two transactions may indefinitely wait on each another to release resources. This condition is known as a deadlock or a deadly embrace
Deadlock Example • User A wants to order some paper • If she can get the paper, she wants to order pencils • User B wants to order some pencils. • If he can get the pencils, he will order paper
Optimistic Locking Read data Process transaction Issue update Look for conflict If conflict occurred, rollback and repeat Else commit Pessimistic Locking Lock required resources Read data Process transaction Issue commit Release locks Optimistic versus Pessimistic Locking
Consistent Transactions • Consistent transactions are often referred to by the acronym ACID • Atomic • Consistent • Isolated • Durable
ACID: Atomic • A transaction consists of a series of steps. Each step must be successful for the transaction to be saved • This ensures that the transaction completes everything it intended to do before saving the changes
ACID: Consistent • No other transactions are permitted on the records until the current transaction finishes • This ensures that the transaction integrity has statement level consistency among all records
ACID: Consistent • Example: • UPDATE CUSTOMERSET AreaCode = ‘425’WHERE ZipCode = ‘14048’; • CUSTOMER table has 500,000 rows. 500 match above zipcode • May take awhile to find them all – can other transactions update during this? • Statement level consistency – update will apply to the set of rows as they existed at the time the SQL Statement started
ACID: Isolation • Within multiuser environments, different transactions may be operating on the same data • As such, the sequencing of uncommitted updates, rollbacks, and commits continuously change the data content
ACID: Durable • A durable transaction is one in which all committed changes are permanent • Even in the case of failure