330 likes | 369 Views
ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing, Spring 2014. Depth and Surface EEG: Generation and Propagation. Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center kmajumdar@isibang.ac.in. Baillet et al., IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag., Nov 2001, p. 16. Head, Brain and Signal.
E N D
ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing, Spring 2014 Depth and Surface EEG: Generation and Propagation Kaushik Majumdar Indian Statistical Institute Bangalore Center kmajumdar@isibang.ac.in
Baillet et al., IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag., Nov 2001, p. 16 Head, Brain and Signal ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Mountcastle, Brain, 120:701-722, 1997 Six Layer Brain Excitatory post synaptic potential (EPSP) ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Chemical-Electrical-Sequence ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Electroencephalogram (EEG) and Electrocorticogram (ECoG) LFP Surface electrode Depth electrode ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
LFP, ECoG and EEG Comparison of SNR in EEG and ECoG for four patients P1 – P4. The ratio of SNR varies from 21 to 173. Ball et al., NeuroImage, 46: 708 – 716, 2009. Buzsaki et al., Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 13: 407 – 420, 2012 ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Signal Acquisition Depth EEG Scalp EEG Curtsey: Freiburg Seizure Prediction Project, Germany International 10-20 system. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:21_electrodes_of_International_10-20_system_for_EEG.svg ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Information Propagation from Cortex to Scalp • Local field potential (LFP) is the most information-rich among all the functional brain signals. • LFP is also strongly correlated with blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signal. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
http://www.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2009/656092/fig1/ EEG Forward Problem ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Hallez et al., 2007 3-Layer Realistic Head Model Brain Skull Head ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Different Model Paradigms Source Models Head Models Boundary Elements Method (previous slide) Finite Elements Method Finite Difference Method • Dipole Source Model • Distributed Source Model Hallez et al., 2007 Majumdar, IEEE TBME, 56(4): 1228 – 1235, 2009 ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Dipole Orientations In a dipole source model number of dipoles must have to be fixed beforehand. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Hallez et al., 2007 Mathematical Formulation EEG Lead filed matrix or gain matrix Dipoles ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Hallez et al., 2007 Tissue Impedance ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Kybic et al., Phys. Med. Biol., 51: 1333 – 1346, 2006 Poisson’s Equation for the Head ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Potential at any Single Scalp Electrode Due to All Dipoles r is the position vector of the scalp electrode rdip - i is the position vector of the ith dipole di is the dipole moment of the ith dipole ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
EEG Gain Matrix Calculation For detail of potential calculations see Geselowitz, Biophysical J., 7, 1967, 1-11. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Gain Matrix : Elaboration The whole purpose of the forward problem or head modeling is to determine the gain matrix, which will have to be inverted in some sense during solving the inverse problem. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Boundary Elements Method for Distributed Source Model • If on the complement of a smooth surface then can be completely determined by its values and the values of its derivatives on that surface. This is utilized to solve the forward problem, with distributed source, by BEM. For detail see Kybic, et al., IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., 24(1): 12 – 28, 2005. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Inverse Problem : Peculiarities • Inverse problem is ill-posed, because the number of sensors is less than the number of possible sources. • Solution is unstable, i.e., susceptible to small changes in the input values. Scalp EEG is full of artifacts and noise, so identified sources are likely to be spurious. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Geometric Interpretation ||V-BJ||2Wn ||J||2Wp Convex combination of the two terms with λ very small. minU(J) ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Derivation U(J) = ||V – BJ||2Wn + λ||J||2Wp = <Wn(V – BJ), Wn(V – BJ)> + λ<WpJ, WpJ> ΔJU(J) = 0 implies (using <AB,C> = <B,ATC>) J = CpBT[BCpBT + Cn]-1V where Cp = (WTpWp)-1 and Cn = λ(WTnWn)-1. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Derivation U(J) = ||V – BJ||2Wn + λ||J||2Wp = <Wn(V – BJ), Wn(V – BJ)> + λ<WpJ, WpJ> ΔJU(J) = 0 implies (using <AB,C> = <B,ATC>) J = CpBT[BCpBT + Cn]-1V where Cp = (WTpWp)-1 and Cn = λ(WTnWn)-1. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Different Types • When Cp = Ip (the p x p identity matrix) it reduces to classical minimum norm inverse solution. • If we derive the current density estimate by the minimum norm inverse and then standardize it using its variance, which is hypothesized to be due to the source variance, then that is called sLORETA. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing Pascual-Marqui et al., Int. J. Psychophysiol., vol. 18, p. 49 – 65, 1994.
Standardized Low Resolution Brain Electromagnetic Tomography (sLORETA) U(J) = ||V – BJ||2 + λ||J||2 Ĵ = TV, where T = BT[BBT + λH]+, where H = I – LLT/LTL is the centering matrix. Pascual-Marqui at http://www.uzh.ch/keyinst/NewLORETA/sLORETA/sLORETA-Math02.htm ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
sLORETA (cont) Ĵ is estimate of J, A+ denotes the Moore-Penrose inverse of the matrix A, I is n x n identity matrix where n is the number of scalp electrodes, L is a n dimensional vector of 1’s. Hypothesis : Variance in Ĵ is due to the variance of the actual source vector J. Ĵ = BT[BBT + λH]+BJ. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
Form of H ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
If # Source = # Electrodes = n • B and BT both will be n x n identity matrix. with λ = 0 ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
http://www.uzh.ch/keyinst/loreta.htm sLORETA Result ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
http://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2009/12/inhibited-behavior-and-our-right.htmlhttp://mindblog.dericbownds.net/2009/12/inhibited-behavior-and-our-right.html EEG Source Modeling at DLPFC During behavioral inhibition the right DLPFC is more active than the left. ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing
References • S. Baillet, J. C. Mosher and R. M. Leahy, Electromagnetic brain mapping, IEEE Sig. Proc. Mag., 18(6): 14 – 30, 2001. • H. Hallez et al., Review on solving the forward problem in EEG source analysis, J. Neuroeng. Rehab., 4: 46, 2007. Available online at http://www.jneuroengrehab.com/content/4/1/46 ME (Signal Processing), IISc: Neural Signal Processing