1 / 104

CDF 実験の最新結果

CDF 実験の最新結果. 筑波大学　佐藤構二 6/23/2011 首都 大学 東京. Contents. Introduction Tevatron Accelerator, CDF and D0 Detectors. Top Physics Direct Search for Higgs Bosons Standard Model Higgs MSSM Higgs Bosons B Physics Exotic Physics Searches at CDF Summary. Introduction. Tevatron Run II.

davin
Download Presentation

CDF 実験の最新結果

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CDF実験の最新結果 筑波大学　佐藤構二 6/23/2011 首都大学東京

  2. Contents • Introduction • Tevatron Accelerator, CDF and D0 Detectors. • Top Physics • Direct Search for Higgs Bosons • Standard Model Higgs • MSSM Higgs Bosons • B Physics • Exotic Physics Searches at CDF • Summary

  3. Introduction

  4. Tevatron Run II • First collision in Run 0 was in 1985 (26 years ago!!) • collisions at =1.96 TeV (1.8 TeV in Run I). • Run II started in Summer 2001. • Collisions at world highest energy until Nov 2009. • Two multi-purpose detectors for wide range of physics studies.

  5. Tevatron Run II — Luminosity Status • Typical Peak Luminosity : 4  1032 cm2 s-1. • Delivers 70 - 80 pb-1/week. • Integrated Luminosity: 11.3 fb-1 • Recorded by CDF: 9.5 fb-1. • Recent CDF analyses typically use up to ~7 fb-1. • Typical data taking efficiency of CDF: ~ 85% No significant drop after 10 years of running!! (CDF)

  6. Tevatron Plans • 2010: strong discussion on 3 year extention of Tevatron up to FY2014. • LHC was planning to shutdown a whole year in 2012. • Tevatron was expected to compete with LHC in SM Higgs searches. 2014 ”>3σ Evidence” In 100<MH<180 GeVの SM Higgs Discovery Potential ofTevatron (2010 Projection) Recommendation 1: The panel recommends that the agencies proceed with a three-year extension of the Tevatron program if the resources required to support such an extension become available in addition to the present funding for HEP. Given the strong physics case, we encourage the funding agencies to try to find the needed additional resources. (October 26, 2010, P5 report) 2011 2.4σ in MH<180 GeV Summer 2010 Dataset

  7. Tevatron Termination

  8. Tevatron Termination Tevatron will close at the end of FY2011 (Sep 30, 2011)

  9. Tevatronv.s LHC

  10. Collider Detector at Fermilab Multi-purpose detector • Tracking in 1.4 T magnetic field. • Coverage |h|<~1. • Precision tracking with silicon. • 7 layers of silicon detectors. • EM and Hadron Calorimeters. • sE/E ~ 14%/E (EM). • sE/E ~ 84%/E (HAD). • Muon chambers.

  11. Collider Detector at Fermilab ~600 physicists from 12 nations and 61 institutions Canada Spain USA IFAE, Barcelona CIEMAT, Madrid Univ. of Cantabria Argonne National Lab. Baylor Univ. Brandeis Univ. UC Davis UC Los Angeles UC San Diego UC Santa Barbara Carnegie Mellon Univ. Univ. of Chicago Duke Univ. Fermilab Univ. of Florida Harvard Univ. Univ. of Illinois The Johns Hopkins Univ. LBNL MIT Michigan State Univ. Univ. of Michigan Univ. of New Mexico Northwestern Univ. The Ohio State Univ. Univ. of Pennsylvania Univ. of Pittsburgh Purdue Univ. Univ. of Rochester Rockefeller Univ. Rutgers Univ. Texas A&M Univ. Tufts Univ. Wayne State Univ. Univ. of Wisconsin Yale Univ. McGill Univ. Univ. of Toronto Russia France JINR, Dubna ITEP, Moscow LPNHE, Paris Germany Korea Univ. Karlsruhe KHCL Switzerland Japan Univ. of Geneva KEK Okayama Univ. Osaka City Univ. Univ. of Tsukuba Waseda Univ. UK Glasgow Univ. Univ. of Liverpool Univ. of Oxford Univ. College London Taiwan Academia Sinica Italy Univ. of Bologna, INFN Frascati, INFN Univ. di Padova, INFN Pisa, INFN Univ. di Roma, INFN INFN-Trieste Univ. di Udine

  12. D0 Detector Multi-purpose detector • Silicon detector covering up to |h|<3 rapidity • Compact scintillating fiber tracker • 2.0 Tesla axial B field • Hermetic U/liquid Ar calorimeter • Extended muon coverage

  13. Top Physics

  14. b q’ p Top Physics at Tevatron W helicity Top Mass • Top quark was observed at TEVATRON in 1995. • Top is still the least studied observed particle. • Any deviation from SM might suggest new physics!! • Top mass is unexpectedly heavy ~35mb. • Special role in EWSB? l+ Top Width Anomalous Couplings Top lifetime Production cross-section W+ CP violation Top Charge Resonance production p n t b Production kinematics _ ttbar decay modes: X _ ttbar Spin correlation _ t q Rare/non SM Decays W- _ Branching Ratios |Vtb|

  15. Top Pair Cross Section (L+jets) • s(NLO) = 7.4 +0.5-0.7 pb • Top quark is mostly produced in pairs at Tevatron. ~15% ~85% • Event selection: • 1 lepton Pt>20, |h|<2.0 • MET>25 • ≥3 jets with Pt>20 , |h|<2.0 • ≥ 1 jet b-tagged stt = 7.04 ± 0.34 (stat.) ± 0.55 (syst.) ± 0.43 (lumi.) pb The dominant luminosity systematic can be canceled out by measuring ratio stt /sZ. stt = 7.14 ± 0.34 (stat.) ± 0.58 (syst.) ± 0.14 (theory) pb(4.3 fb-1)

  16. Top Pair Cross Section Summary • Cross section is sensitive to both production and decay anomaly. • The difference between different decay modes might indicate new physics. • CDF measures xs with various decay modes/methods, and the results are consistent with SM.

  17. b l+ g q t W+ n q t q g W- q’ b Forward Backward Assymmetry • CDF Analysis in L+jetschannel. • Related to qqbar initial state - specially interesting at Tevatron. • Interference terms between LO and NLO diagrams  ~5% asymmetry. q: lepton charge yh: rapidity of hadronic top 5.3 fb-1, Summer 2010 AFB = 15.8± 7.5 % AFBSM = 5.8 ± 0.9 % consistent

  18. Mttbar Dependence of AFB in L+jets at CDF Mttbar = 450 GeV MttbarDistribution: 5.3 fb-1, Winter 2011 update Low Mass Region High Mass Region Low Mass Region High Mass Region AFB = -11.6± 15.3 % AFB = 47.5± 11.4 % AFBSM = 4.0 ± 0.6 % AFBSM = 8.8 ± 1.3 % consistent ~3.3 σ deviation

  19. AFB Measurement in L+jets at D0 • D0 analysis in L+jets. • Asymmetry defined as: Dy = ytop – yanti-top Thought not as significant, same trend as CDF!! 4.3 fb-1, Summer 2010 AFB = 8± 4(stat) ±2(syst) % AFBSM = 1 +2-1 %

  20. AFB Measurementin Dilepton atCDF Full Reconstruction Dy distribution Lepton Dy distribution 5.1 fb-1, Winter 2011 AobsFB= 43 ±15 (stat) ±5 (syst) % ASMFB= 6 ±1 % 2.3s deviation

  21. Mttbar Dependence of AFB in Dilepton at CDF Mttbar = 450 GeV MttbarDistribution: 5.1 fb-1, Winter 2011 High Mass Region Low Mass Region Low Mass Region High Mass Region AFB = -10.4±6.6 (stat only) % AFB = 21.2±9.6 (stat only) % AFBSM = 0.3 ± 3.1 % AFBSM = -4.0 ± 5.5 %

  22. Single Top Production • 1 lepton, MET, 2 or 3 jets • S/B separation by Matrix Element (ME) • Top quark is sometimes singly produced Tevatron. • Event selection: • 1 lepton, Pt>20 • MET>25 • 2 or 3 jets, Pt>20, |h|<2.8 • ≥1 jet b-tagged s-channel bkgd ME Signal ME Vtb Vtb* • 0.884±0.11 pb(NLO) t-channel Vtb* Vtb 4.3 s effect st+s-chan = 2.5 +0.7-0.6 pb(3.2 fb-1) • 1.98±0.25 pb(NLO)

  23. Single Top Combined Result t-channel s-channel (2010) Vtb* Vtb Vtb Vtb* • 0.884±0.11 pb(NLO) • 1.98±0.25 pb(NLO) 5.0 s observation!! st+s-chan = 2.3 +0.6-0.5 pb st-chan = 0.8±0.4pb ss-chan = 1.8+0.7-0.5pb |Vtb| = 0.91 ± 0.11 (exp.) ± 0.07 (theory) |Vtb| > 0.71 at 95% C.L.

  24. W Mass Measurement CDF, 200 pb-1 (2007) D0, 1 fb-1 (2009) Best single measurement of the time. Best single measurement!

  25. W Mass Uncertainty Future Projection CDF working on 2.3 fb-1 data

  26. W Mass World Average

  27. b l+ 100% g q t W+ n 15% 85% q t q g W- 100% q’ b Top Mass Measurement in L+jets Events (CDF) PDFs Matrix Element Detector Response Func. In-situ JES calibration x: parton level momenta y: measured momenta 2-D likelihood Fit to data : Controls background by a Neural Net Discriminant: mt = 173.0 ± 0.7 (stat.) ± 0.6 (JES) ± 0.9 (syst.) GeV/c2 = 173.0 ± 1.2 (total) GeV/c2 Best single measurement, 0.7% precision!

  28. Top Mass World Average

  29. Top Mass Uncertainty Future Projection

  30. Constraint to SM Higgs Mass (Jul 2010) Precise W and Top Mass measurements constrains the SM Higgs Mass due to the radiative correction: mH< 158 GeV @ 95% CL (mH = 89.0 +35/-26 GeV) mH < 185 GeV @ 95% CL including LEP2 direct search limit Mtop = 173.3 ± 1.1 GeV/c2 MW = 80.399 ± 0.023 GeV/c

  31. Constraint to SM Higgs Mass (Jul 2010) Precise W and Top Mass measurements constrains the SM Higgs Mass due to the radiative correction: • In 2003: • Mtop = 178.0  4.3 GeV/c2 • MW =80410  32 MeV/c2 Mhiggs < 260 GeV/c2 (95% C.L.) Progress due to the TEVATRON Run II Results mH < 158 GeV @ 95% CL (mH = 89.0 +35/-26 GeV) Mtop = 173.3 ± 1.1 GeV/c2 MW = 80.399 ± 0.023 GeV/c2

  32. Direct Search for Higgs Bosons

  33. Production Cross Sections recently observed

  34. SM Higgs Properties at Tevatron • mH<135 GeV (low mass): • gg→H→bb is difficult to see. • Look for WH/ZH with leptonic vector boson decays. • mH>135 GeV (high mass): • Easiest to look for H→WW with one or two W decaying to lepton. bb WW

  35. WHlbb(low mass) • S/B separation by NN. • Four tagging categories, using 3 algorithms (including NN tagger). • NN based b-jet energy correction NN Outputs: 2 tag 1 tag Observed upper limit 4.5 x σ(SM)(@115 GeV)

  36. ZH  ll+bb (low mass) l • 3 b-tag categories with 2 algorithms. • S/B separation by NN. • Improved lepton coverage with new loose muon category. • Dominant backgrounds: • Z+jets, top, diboson NN Outputs: l (mH=120 GeV) Observed upper limit 6.0 x σ(SM)(@115 GeV)

  37. WH/ZHMET+bb (low mass) • Target process: ZHnnbb • Also complementary to WHlnbbsearch. • 3 b-tag categories with 2 algorithms. • S/B separation by NN. • Dominant backgrounds: • QCD with MET miscalculation • W/Z+jets, top, diboson 2 tag 1 tag (mH=115 GeV) Observed upper limit 2.3 x σ(SM)(@115 GeV)

  38. H  WW*l+ l- (high mass) • Opposite Sign 2 leptons. • Lepton acceptance improved by using isolated tracks. • S/B separation by NN. • Matrix element calculation result input to NN. • Dominant background • DY, Diboson, top • Independently analyses OS/SS 2 leptons + 1/2 jets events to include WHWWW and VBF HWW signal inacceptance. Updating for Winter 2011… Observed upper limit : 1.08 x σ(SM)(@165 GeV)

  39. Summary of SM Higgs Searches at CDF

  40. SM HiggsCDF and D0 Combined Limits CDF Combined: D0 Combined:

  41. SM HiggsTevatron Combined Limit 95% CL exclusion : 158 < mH <175 GeV mH<110 GeV(LEP2: mH<114.4 GeV)

  42. SM Higgs Search –competition with ATLAS experiments, March 2011

  43. Tevatron and LHC Summer 2011 Projection Results will be shown in ~1 month!! Tevatron: Exclusion of Mh<180 GeV Tevatron Summer 2011 ~ 8fb-1 / exp. ATLAS: Exclusion of 130<Mh<450GeV

  44. Search for MSSM Higgs • Extended Higgs sector in SUSY models • f = (H0, A0, h0) and H± • Higgs coupling enhancement at large tanb: • Large increase (×~tan2b) in production cross sections compared to SM: ggf, gbbf • for MA>100 GeV. • Br(ftt)~9% • fbb~90% •  Useful search modes at Tevatron: • fττ • f+ bττ + b • f+ b  bb + b

  45. MSSM ftt • Both experiments analyzed τeτhad, τμ τhad, τeτμ channels (Opposite Sign) CDF 1.8 fb-1(2007) D0 2.2 fb-1(2008) τeτhad+τμ τhad+τeτμ

  46. MSSM fttTevatron Combination Combined, 2010

  47. MSSM fbbbb at CDF • Analyze events with 3 b-tagged jets. • Utilizes trigger-level b-tagging. • Fully data-driven multi-jets backgrounds. • Define a flavor separator based on Mvtx for improved background understanding. 2.2 fb-1 Di-jet mass, m12 of the leading 2 jets: ~ 2s deviation from background at ~140 GeV

  48. MSSM fbbbb at D0 • Analyze events with 3 b-tagged jets. • Subdivide candidates into 3- and 4-jets samples. • S/B separation by Likelihood Discriminant. Di-jet mass: Upper Limit on Cross Section: Likelihood Discriminant: Working on fbbbb TEVATRON combination this summer!!

  49. MSSM fbttb at D0 • A new search channel!! • Search in bτμτhad channel. • Event selection: Isolated m, τhad, MET and a b-tagged jet. • Improve S/B separation using NN-based discriminant. • Dominant Bkg: Z+jets, ttbar, multi-jets. Reconstructed Higgs Mass (GeV) NN-based Discriminant Upper Limit on Cross Section

  50. Mjjin W+2jets events

More Related