1 / 25

Beyond GDP Measuring social progress in Europe

Beyond GDP Measuring social progress in Europe. Koen Decancq – Erik Schokkaert Frankfurt June 2013. Introduction. Recent interest in going “ beyond GDP” This paper: how can ( should ) we measure social progress ? Answer on three levels :

dawson
Download Presentation

Beyond GDP Measuring social progress in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beyond GDPMeasuringsocialprogress in Europe Koen Decancq – Erik Schokkaert Frankfurt June 2013

  2. Introduction • Recent interest in going “beyond GDP” • This paper: howcan (should) we measuresocialprogress? • Answeronthreelevels: • Principlesfor a measure of socialprogress • A specificproposal: equivalent income. • Illustration: well-being and socialprogress in Europebetween 2008 and 2010.

  3. Outline • Principlesfor a measure of socialprogress. • A specificproposal: equivalent income. • Illustration: well-being and socialprogress in Europebetween 2008 and 2010.

  4. Principle 1: focus onindividualwell-being The ultimatecriterion to evaluatesocialprogress is the well-being of individualsmaking up a society. • Quidfuturegenerations? • Sustainability as restriction to beimposedon present generations.

  5. Principle 2: focus onoutcomes Information must becollectedon the different dimensions of lifethat are important for the well-being of individualcitizens. • Well-being is notfullydeterminedbyincomeormaterialconsumption. • Otherdimensions of life are essential (e.g. health, quality of socialinteractions and of the natural environment, safety, … ). • Development of lists of specificpolicy indicators is a different issue. We focus on “outputs” ratherthanon “inputs”.

  6. Principle 3: accounting forcumulativedeprivation

  7. Principle 3: accounting forcumulativedeprivation Accounting forcumulativedeprivationrequiresthatonefirstconstructsan index of well-being at the individual level and thenaggregates these well-being indices acrossindividuals. • Comparewith the HDI … • … and MPI

  8. Principle 4: Respect forindividualideasabout a goodlife The weightingschemeapplied to construct the measure of individualwell-beingshould respect the individualideasaboutwhat is a goodlife. • Thisdiscards the use of objective indicators, such as the HumanDevelopment Index, MPI, …

  9. Principle 5: avoidance of physical-conditionneglect • Thenwhynotuse “happiness”? • Becauseit does not respect individualideasabout the goodlife! • “A personwho is ill-fed, undernourished, unsheltered and illcanstillbe high up in the scale of happinessordesire-fulfillmentifheorshe has learned to have ‘realistic’ desires and to takepleasure in smallmercies” (Sen, 1985). • Muchevidenceonadaptation in the empiricalliterature. Happinessor (subjectivelifesatisfaction) maybeone of the important dimensions of life, butitshouldnotbeseen as anencompassingmeasure of individualwell-being.

  10. Principle 6: inequalityaversion Justicerequires accounting forinequality in individualwell-being.

  11. Outline • Principlesfor a measure of socialprogress. • A specificproposal: equivalent income. • Illustration: well-being and socialprogress in Europebetween 2008 and 2010.

  12. A specificproposal: Equivalent incomes • Fixreferencevaluesfor all the non-incomedimensions. • Equivalent income = the hypotheticalincomethat, ifcombinedwith the referencevalueon all non-incomedimensions, would place the individual in a situationthatshefindsequallygood as her actualsituation.

  13. An example: income and health

  14. An example: income and health

  15. An example: income and health

  16. An example: income and health

  17. An example: income and health

  18. Pros (and cons) of equivalent incomes • Equivalent income = actualincome minus the welfare loss incurredon the non-incomedimensions (measured as willingness-to-pay). • Satisfies all ourbasicprinciples. • Measurable in money terms, canbeintroduced in anysocial welfare, inequalityorpovertymeasure.

  19. (Pros and) cons of equivalent incomes • LessintuitivethanhappinessorHDI – but these approaches do notsatisfyourbasicprinciples. • Choice of referencevalues: An ethicalquestion (notpsychological!) • More information is neededabout “preferences” (or WTP) • Statedpreferences: Contingent valuationsurveys (environment, health). • Revealedpreference: estimatefromobservedchoices and behaviour. • Deriveinformationaboutwillingness-to-payfromlifesatisfactionquestions.

  20. Outline • Principlesfor a measure of socialprogress. • A specificproposal: equivalent income. • Illustration: well-being and socialprogress in Europebetween 2008 and 2010.

  21. SocialProgress in Europe: An illustration • EuropeanSocialSurvey, 2008 and 2010. (SILC does notcontain a questiononlifesatisfaction). • 18 countries: 15 EU-members, Switzerland, Norway, the RussianFederation. About 52,000 individualobservations. • Dimensions:

  22. Estimatingpreferencedifferences • Assumption: preferences do notdifferbetween different countries. • Different groups have different preferences:

  23. Income, equivalent income, happiness (2010)

  24. Yearlygrowthrates (2008-2010)

  25. Conclusion • We stronglybelieve in the basic principles. Debateshouldbeabouttheirethical foundation. • The equivalent income is aninteresting concept, but theremaybeother approaches. • Ourempiricalillustration is onlymeant to beanillustration, butinterestingfindings Data need: introducequestionson “willingness-topay” orsatisfactionwithlifeon a regular basis in SILC.

More Related