1 / 21

NATO/PfP Advanced Distributed Learning Prototype Presentation to the ADL Working Group

NATO/PfP Advanced Distributed Learning Prototype Presentation to the ADL Working Group. 05 October, 2001. Dr. Gokay Sursal Allied Command Atlantic Norfolk, Virginia. OUTLINE. BACKGROUND CDE PROCESS : DEFINITION/ BENEFITS WHY APPLY CDE TO ADL PROTOTYPE? TEAM BUILDING FEASIBILITY PHASE

dayton
Download Presentation

NATO/PfP Advanced Distributed Learning Prototype Presentation to the ADL Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATO/PfPAdvanced Distributed Learning Prototype Presentation to the ADL Working Group 05 October, 2001 Dr. Gokay Sursal Allied Command AtlanticNorfolk, Virginia

  2. OUTLINE • BACKGROUND • CDE PROCESS : DEFINITION/ BENEFITS • WHY APPLY CDE TO ADL PROTOTYPE? • TEAM BUILDING • FEASIBILITY PHASE • PROTOTYPE PLAN • PARTICIPANTS • ADL CDE PROJECT TIME-LINE • QUALITY OF A PROTOTYPE • FACTORS THAT INFLUENCE QUALITY

  3. BACKGROUND • WASHINGTON SUMMIT 1999 WASHINGTON SUMMIT 1999

  4. BACKGROUND(CONT.) • MCM 211-99 ……….12/99 • Paris Workshop…….04/00 • Interim ADL Report …06/00 • Vilnius Workshop ……09/00 • Final ADL Report…….11/00 • MCM 016-01……………01/01 • Brussels Experts Meeting..01/01 • Interim Prototype Report…03/01 • Brussels Workshop………..04/01 • Final Prototype Report…….05/01

  5. BACKGROUND(CONT.) • RESULTING THREE ACTIVITIES • POLICY DOCUMENT - IMS • PROTOTYPE STUDY -RTB (NMSG) + NATO (SACLANT) • SIMULATION REQUIREMENTS - SACLANT

  6. CDE Background • CDE part of Defence Concept Initiatives (DCI) announced at NATO Summit (Apr 99) • SACLANT, on behalf of both SCs developed Concept Development & Experimentation process • CDE approved by Military Committee (Sep 00)

  7. -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- -------------- ------------ • Doctrine • Training • Organization • Equipment Promotes Collaboration Definition CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT & EXPERIMENTATION (CDE) • A forward looking process • Develops and evaluate new concepts • Identifies future capabilities • Focuses on near, mid and long-term • Uses an Alliance framework • Augments national & NATO lead activities • Provides several benefits

  8. Concept Development and Experimentation Concept Identification Concept Management Review White Paper Bi-SC Working Group Review Review Selected Concepts Annual Report to MC Feasibility & Concept Development Experimental Plan/ Experimentation Conclusions, Recommendations, Implementation Tier One Tier Two Tier Three

  9. CDE Applied to ADL Prototype White Paper • Feasiblity of CDE Approach applied to ADL prototype • Develop plan for subsequent activity ADL Feasibility Study ADL Concept Development • Explore problem, options, solutions • In-depth examination of specific options using the prototype ADL Experimentation

  10. Why Apply CDE toADL Prototype? • CDE is needed to: • validate proposed ADL solutions • assess wide range of options in rigorous manner • development broad-based collaborative solutions, requiring multi-agency approach • achieve high-level interest to generate resources and obtain more comprehensive examination of solutions • promote “big picture” NATO/PfP approach to bring in the state-of-the-art in ADL to concept development and experimentation

  11. FORCE CIVIL OPERATIONAL ARMAMENTS ACADEMIC NATO PLANNING INDUSTRY GOVERNMENT INDUSTRY LOG CIS NATIONAL R&T NIAG ADL Project Lead NATO DEF. COLLEGE SLC MSG HFM NATO EDUCATION NATO R&T OP PLAN- NING NC3A US NATO TRNG. GROUP NATO SCHOOL NATO SCHOOL RTO NC3A NTG GE SWISS NDC CollaborativeProject Team Building

  12. CONCEPT FEASIBILITY • PROTOTYPE TECHNICALLY FEASIBLE • PROTOTYPE WILL PROVIDE: • EMBRYONIC IMMEDIATE CAPABILITY • THE BASIS FOR EVALUATING BENEFITS • THE BASIS FOR SPECIFYING THE PROCUREMENT OF AN OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY • THE LACK OF AN EXISTING NATO DEDICATED NETWORK IS NOT AN IMPEDIMENT FOR THE PROTOTYPE

  13. CONCEPT FEASIBILITY (cont.) • PROTOTYPE MANAGEMENT RESIDENT AT SACLANT • THE WEB MASTER AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT WILL BE PROVIDED BY VNC • INITIALLY PROTOTYPE WILL BE CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET THROUGH A PASSWORD-PROTECTED FIREWALL . ACCESS REQUIREMENTS AND POLICIES WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH NATO REGULATIONS.

  14. CONCEPT FEASIBILITY (cont.) • THE SITE WILL BE COMPOSED OF MINIMAL HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE. • THE PROTOTYPE WILL BE POPULATED BY A LIMITED NUMBER OF COURSES COMPLIANT WITH MILITARY COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED PRIORITIES.

  15. PROTOTYPE PLAN • CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT • DEVELOP COURSES IN SCORM STANDARD • DEVELOP WEB PAGE • INSTALL LMS • FIND CANDIDATE USER GROUPS • CONCEPT EXPERIMENTATION • MANAGE/MONITOR USE OF PROTOTYPE • MEASURE USER PERFORMANCE • IDENTIFY RESOURCE/ ORGANIZATIONAL /ARCHITECTURE ISSUES OUTPUT : REQUIREMENT FOR OPS ADL CAPABILITY

  16. PARTICIPANTS • NMAs (SACLANT, SHAPE, IMS) • RTA- NMSG • RTA-HFM PANEL ADL TT • NATO TRAINING GROUP WG ON IT/ED • NATO DEFENCE COLLEGE • NATO SCHOOL (SHAPE) • PfP CONSORTIUM • NATIONS (CANADA, GERMANY, SWITZERLAND, AND USA)

  17. ADL CDE Project Time Line FEASIBILITY STUDY TEAM BUILDING & EXPLORATORY MEETINGS DEVELOP NATO & NATIONAL ADL RQMTS DEVELOP COURSE CONTENT CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT INSTALL COURSES ON WEB PAGE DETERMINE USER GROUPS EXPERIMENTATION CONDUCT EXPERIMENTS EVALUATE PROTOTYPE PREPARE FINAL REPORT 2001 2002

  18. QUALITY OF A PROTOTYPE • QUALITY OF A PROTOTYPE IS AN INDICATION OF THE QUALITY OF AN OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY. • PROTOTYPE WILL INVESTIGATE IF THE OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY WHEN DEVELOPED WILL SATISFY THE USER REQUIREMENTS.

  19. PROTOTYPE QUALITY FACTORS • INTEROPERABILITY • HARDWARE • SOFTWARE • NETWORK • CONFORMANCE TO STANDARDS • MODULARITY- DESIGN • USABILITY - USER FRIENDLY • REUSABILITY- SHARED OBJECTS

  20. PROTOTYPE QUALITY FACTORS (cont.) • PORTABILITY- INSTALLATION • ADAPTABILITY- CHANGES • EFFICIENCY- TRANSMISSION • SECURITY- ACCESS RESTRICTION • RELIABILITY- ROBUSTNESS • LEARNABILITY- COGNITIVE ASPECT • COMPREHENSIBILITY- LANGUAGE • RETAINABILITY-

  21. Questions?

More Related