130 likes | 231 Views
Wisconsin Technical College. Measuring Skill Attainment – DQI February 8, 2006. Core Indicator Components. Valid and Reliable Assessment System Employer Validated Standards Met/Not Met Levels for Reporting Concentrator – Denominator Measurement Process.
E N D
Wisconsin Technical College Measuring Skill Attainment – DQI February 8, 2006
Core Indicator Components • Valid and Reliable Assessment System • Employer Validated Standards • Met/Not Met Levels for Reporting • Concentrator – Denominator • Measurement Process
Valid and Reliable Assessment Systems • Accreditation sets the framework for Valid and Reliable Assessment Systems. • The assessment of student learning is a priority for all accreditation organizations.
Valid and Reliable Assessment Systems • Five Criteria for Accreditation • 3a. The organization’s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible. Source: The Higher Learning Commission, Institutional Accreditation: An Overview at www.ncahigherlearningcommission.org
WTCS Practices • Program Development and Approval Process http://systemattic.wtcsystem.org/Instruction/ESM/default.htm • Worldwide Instructional Design Systems (WIDS) http://www.wids.org/ • Program Advisory Committees http://systemattic.wtcsystem.org/Policy/Adminbul/02-03.pdf • Program Evaluation (QRP) http://systemattic.wtcsystem.org/qrp/default.htm
Employer Validated Standards • Employers set standards at the program development/curriculum development stage. • Employers participate in program evaluation every three - five years. • Employer validated standards set the course outcomes. • Student Learning Outcomes assessed for each course.
Met/Not Met Measurement • All Concentrators who took a technical course are measured. • Concentrator took 24 credits the start of the cohort. • The measurement period is three years. • The measurement is: Did the student pass 80% of the courses attempted?
Benefits • Course completion covers all concentrators and is comparable throughout a college and between colleges. • Course completion data is readily available.
Benefits • Because colleges can identify students in the first year of the cohort and track progress… • There is an opportunity to intervene directly with current students. • Tracking students over time supports enrollment management.
Benefits • Data analysis on course completion allows for targeted improvement strategies and college Improvement Plans that can be monitored. • It is possible to clearly demonstrate whether students are improving.
Benefits • There is a direct link between grant funded activities and performance improvement.
Cost • Collecting course completion information has no cost. • Grades are not collected. • No system exists to collect information on licensure or certification. Developing one would be costly and represent a minority of the concentrators.
Challenges • Getting colleges to be proactive about accountability. • Competing accountability priorities for colleges • Keeping curriculum up to date • Keeping instructors current • Accountability is labor and cost intensive