1 / 11

T 1 spin lifetimes in n-doped quantum wells and dots

T 1 spin lifetimes in n-doped quantum wells and dots. John S. Colton Brigham Young University. Students: (grad) Tyler Park (undergrads) Ken Clark David Meyer Daniel Craft Phil White Jane Cutler . Funding acknowledgement: NASA EPSCoR program.

dbanks
Download Presentation

T 1 spin lifetimes in n-doped quantum wells and dots

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. T1 spin lifetimes in n-doped quantum wells and dots John S. Colton Brigham Young University Students: (grad)Tyler Park (undergrads) Ken Clark David Meyer Daniel Craft Phil White Jane Cutler Funding acknowledgement: NASA EPSCoR program Talk for APS March Meeting Feb 27, 2012

  2. Motivations • Which materials are best? • T1 = longitudinal lifetime, aka “spin relaxation time”, provides useful upper limit for T2, aka “spin coherence time” • What do we learn about the physics? • Example: in QDs, tuning lprobe will change subset of dots being studied. How will relaxation change with dot size?

  3. Longitudinal Pump/Probe Method • Colton et al., Solid State Comm. 152, 410 (2012) (independent gating)

  4. LCP pump RCP pump RCP pump Timing Diagram 12 ms PEM: ~ 1 ms (~10 periods) Pump: Spin polarization (expected): Probe: scan relative delay, lockin signal @ PEM frequency

  5. Data on bulk n-GaAs sample From Colton et al., Solid State Comm. 152, 410 (2012) T1 from fit: 359 ns

  6. Self-Assembled Quantum Dots (InAs on GaAs) Spin Decay Photoluminescence T1 from fit: ~5 ms (using EOM to modulate pump laser in place of PEM)

  7. GaAs Quantum Well: 14 nm, lightly dopedWavelength Dependence, cw response Kerr rotation signal (V) Low energy side: heavy hole exciton High energy side: light hole exciton Probe wavelength adjusted until response from QW seen

  8. Not all directions created equal… Black = scan up,  Green = scan down,  block pump laser, value shifts down—“spin dragging” 50% duty 10% duty 5% duty 1% duty

  9. Summary of Spin Lifetimes: 5K not reproducible lower energy side of peak higher energy side of peak Same value (T2*) No wavelength pattern

  10. 1.5K: Bi-exponential Decays black = raw data red = single exp fit: 265 ns blue = bi-exp fit: 226 ns, 1652 ns

  11. Conclusions • Quantum Dots: • T1 > 5 ms! • Need much more data, including wavelength study to probe different dot sizes • Quantum Well: • Probable nuclear polarization and “spin dragging” • Spin lifetimes from 50-250 ns at 5K; possibly up to 2 ms at 1.5 K • Under some conditions we get two lifetimes • bistability at 5K and large fields • bi-exponential at 1.5 K • Need to understand theory, discussions with Sophia Economou of NRL • Measurements over 5 orders of magnitude in T1!

More Related