80 likes | 95 Views
Join us for a debriefing session on pandemic influenza simulations, where we will identify key issues and gaps in pandemic preparedness planning. We will prioritize actions to be taken and discuss strengths and weaknesses of UN System Influenza Contingency Planning.
E N D
TTXPandemic Influenza SimulationsDebriefing Pandemic Influenza Contingency(PIC) PIC / OCHA
Agenda • 14:00 - 14:25 Breakout Groups – identification of key issues / gaps • 14:30 - 14:40 Group presentations summaries • 14:45 - 15:30 Plenary discussion: Strengths & Weaknesses of UN System Influenza Contingency Planning • 15:30 - 15:45 Coffee break • 16:00 - 16:20 Breakout Groups – prioritisation and next steps • 16:20 – 16:40 Group presentations • 16:40 – 17:00 Summary • 17:00 Questions and open issues
Debriefing Objectives • Identify gaps in Pandemic preparedness planning • Prioritise actions to be taken and next steps • Discussion and questions on simulation
Planning elements • Organisational Structure – modes of operation to be used during the various stages of pandemic including the command and control and mechanisms for internal coordination. • Triggers – identification of triggers, policies and actions to be taken based on the agreed organisational structure. • Continuity of operations – prioritisation of essential programmes to be continued and identification of the requirements / resources needed to ensure this continuity. • Staff health and safety – measures to be considered in order to ensure staff are able to continue to provide essential services. • Support to National Government– assistance to national planning and preparedness and identification and planning for possible additional support during pandemic • External communications – determine the protocols and messages for external communications
Gap analysis – session one • Identify a rapporteur for the group • Group discussion and identification of 4-5 key gaps / requirements based on the simulation. • Findings to be recorded on the flip chart. • Each group rapporteur to provide a 5 minute summary of the findings of the group.
Feedback from the Facilitator Strengths & Weaknesses of Influenza Contingency Planning
Prioritisation – session two • Break down in same groups. • Prioritisation of findings based on the last session and discussion. • Action • Reason why a priority? • Who is responsible for the action? • What resources are required? • By when? • Each group rapporteur to provide a 5 minute summary of the findings of the group.
Summary – The way forward • To be added based on the findings of the simulation. This should be lead by the participant.