1 / 15

Good Life between Buen Vivir and Sumak Kawsay Indicators of a political concept in Ecuador

Explore the history, principles, and impact of Buen Vivir and Sumak Kawsay, the indigenous concepts of living in harmony with nature, society, and oneself in Ecuador, creating a sustainable and just society.

dburditt
Download Presentation

Good Life between Buen Vivir and Sumak Kawsay Indicators of a political concept in Ecuador

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Good Life between Buen Vivir and Sumak KawsayIndicators of a political concept in Ecuador Philipp Altmann

  2. Sumak Kawsay or Buen Vivir? • 2008: Constitution, Preamble: “We decided to build a new form of citizens living together, in diversity and harmony with nature, in order to reach the buen vivir, the sumak kawsay“ • 2010: Declaration at the foot of taita Imbabura: “We manifest that the government of Rafael Correa is a false socialist traitor, populist, genocidal, fascist to the principles of sumak kawsay, furthermore, it covers up the colonialism of the XXI century.“ (CONAIE 2010: 2)

  3. History of the Good Life - I • 2000: Suma Qamaña is established in Bolivia • 2002: Carlos Viteri publishes `Indigenous vision of development in the Amazon´ → `alli káusai´ or `súmac káusai´ / Buen Vivir, reception by Alberto Acosta • 2003: Manifiesto `Sarayaku Sumak Kawsayta Ñawpakma Katina Killka´ / `The Book of Life of Sarayaku to defend our future´ → “Sumak Kawsay, life in plenty.“ (Sarayaku 2003: 10); “life in harmony“ (Sarayaku 2003: 26)

  4. History of the Good Life - II • 2004: Universidad Intercultural Amawtay Wasi → “to walk to wisdom, [...] to get closer to an understanding of the `bien vivir´ [Good Life].“ (UIAW 2004: 172-173) • 2006: Governmental Plan of Movimiento PAIS → “Good Life in harmony with nature, under an irrestrict respect of the human rights.“ (Alianza PAIS 2006: 3) • 2007/2008: Constituent Assembly

  5. Sumak Kawsay in the discourse of the indigenous movement • “Integral Humanism where man and nature in close and harmonic interrelation garanty life.” (CONAIE 1994: 11) • “the principle of Integral Philosophy, in interrelation and reciprocity, between the Cosmos, Man-Nature-Society“ (CONAIE 2001: 3)

  6. Sumak Kawsay and Economy - I • Economy at the service of well-being → “The objective and the principles of economy should not be rentability, but human well-being, the `vivir bien´, the `sumak kawsay´. Economy is just an instrument at the service of the community.” (CONAIE 2007: 7) • Time of regeneration → “give a time of regeneration to nature, in order to be able to renew our own life. [...] Mushuk Allpa, the earth in constant renovation, has been a fundamental premise of Sumak Kawsay.“ (Sarayaku 2003: 3)

  7. Sumak Kawsay and Economy - II • Reciprocity as economic principle → “Economy should be based […] in the principle of reciprocity developed by the community in practices like the minga, the randy randy, the cambia mano or maki mañachi. Principles that radically put into question economic accumulation as the goal of economy.” (CONAIE 2007: 21)

  8. Sumak Kawsay and local knowledge • Revaluation and re-appropiation of traditonal knowledge / Locality → „This living together and this harmony tought us to understand the multiple dimensions that constitute the Sumak Allpa. The muskuy (knowledge and understanding) allowed us to adapt appropiatly to the conditions of life in the jungle and to define our century-long presence in these territories, with our forefathers, the Tayak Runa.“ (Sarayaku 2003: 3-4)

  9. Sumak Kawsay as decolonial proposal • Forms part of a discourse around the concepts of interculturality and plurinationality → territorial autonomy, self-determination → democratization and participation → proposal of a social and political reconstitution • Harmony between individual, society and nature instead of competition between individuals, “there is no such a thing as society“ and culture vs. nature

  10. Buen Vivir and the government • Governmental Plans since 2006 • National Development Plan 2007-2010 • SENPLADES: National Plan for the Buen Vivir 2009-2013 y 2013-2017 → Buen Vivir as harmony → Buen Vivir as alternative to capitalism (Socialism of Buen Vivir)

  11. Buen Vivir of SENPLADES - I • “Buen Vivir does not postulate the no-development, but contributes to a different vision of economy, politics, social relations and the preservation of life on the planet. Buen Vivir promotes the communitarian and sustainable search for collective happiness and an improvement of the quality of life starting from the values.“ (Senplades 2013: 23)

  12. Buen Vivir of SENPLADES - II • 6 Dimensions (in 12 Objetives): 1. Productive diversification and economic security 2. Universal access to superior goods 3. Social equity 4. Social participation 5. Cultural diversity 6. Sustainability

  13. Government Economic and political transformation Rights of nature, sustainability Centralized management with autonomies Sumak Kawsay vs. Buen Vivir? Indigenous Movement • Social transformation • Harmony with nature • Autonomous management within Plurinationality

  14. Thank you!

  15. To go on reading Altmann, Philipp: (2013) Die Indigenenbewegung in Ecuador. Diskurs und Dekolonialität, Bielefeld: transcript. (2013) El Sumak Kawsay en el discurso del movimiento indígena ecuatoriano, in: INDIANA 30: 283-299, http://www.iai.spk-berlin.de/fileadmin/dokumentenbibliothek/Indiana/Indiana_30/IND_30_2013_283-299_Altmann.pdf. (2013) Das Gute Leben als Alternative zum Wachstum? Der Fall Ecuador, in: Sozialwissenschaften und Berufspraxis 36 (1): 101-111. (2013) Good Life as a social movement proposal for natural resource use: The indigenous movement in Ecuador, in: Consilience: The Journal of Sustainable Development X: 59-71, http://www.consiliencejournal.org/index.php/consilience/article/viewFile/340/165.

More Related