1 / 31

Xiaofan Jiang, Chieh -Jan Mike Liang, Kaifei Chen, Ben Zhang, Jeff Hsu

Design and Evaluation of a Wireless Magnetic-based Proximity Detection Platform for Indoor Applications. Xiaofan Jiang, Chieh -Jan Mike Liang, Kaifei Chen, Ben Zhang, Jeff Hsu Jie Liu, Bin Cao, and Feng Zhao Microsoft Research Asia. 20120730-Neight. Outline. MOTIVATION

dean
Download Presentation

Xiaofan Jiang, Chieh -Jan Mike Liang, Kaifei Chen, Ben Zhang, Jeff Hsu

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Design and Evaluation of a Wireless Magnetic-basedProximity Detection Platform for Indoor Applications Xiaofan Jiang, Chieh-Jan Mike Liang, Kaifei Chen, Ben Zhang, Jeff Hsu Jie Liu, Bin Cao, and Feng Zhao Microsoft Research Asia 20120730-Neight

  2. Outline • MOTIVATION • PROXIMITY ZONE • Empirical Definition • EVALUATION OF EXISTING TECHNOLOGIES • LIVESYNERGY PLATFORM • EVALUATION OF LIVESYNERGY • APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT • CONCLUSIONS

  3. Motivation • To make applications intuitive to human users, the discovered objects in the environment must be within the personal interaction sphere • Computer automatically wake up • Refrigerator change its user interface • Many typical low power communication technologies, (Bluetooth, ZigBee) have difficulties maintaining robust communication zones

  4. Contributions • propose methodologies and systematically compare the proximity zones created by various wireless technologies(BLE, ZigBee, and RFID reader) • Design, Implement, and Evaluate a magnetic-induction based wireless proximity sensing platform • Deploying LiveSynergy in an real-world application

  5. PROXIMITY ZONE • Boundary sharpness: boundary of proximity zone should be binary • Boundary consistency: detection should be consistent over time

  6. PROXIMITY ZONE • Obstacle penetration: Beaconing node andlistening node can be mobile and against obstructions • Additional metrics: 1. Range and geometric shape of zones 2. Beaconing frequency achievable 3. Power consumption 4. Form-Factor of the mobile tag 5. Cost of overall system

  7. Classification of Points • Broadcasts at fixed frequency f (packets ) • P =a point in space at a distance of (, , ) from the beacon

  8. Classification of Zones • white/grey boundary: {P | Color(P, t, t’) = white} {P | Color(P, t, t’) = grey} if x,if x’ represents the decision boundary • grey/black boundary: if x,if x’

  9. Three proximity zones

  10. Proximity Zones Questions?

  11. Classifier • Use support vector machines (SVM) as the classifier seeks maximum-margin hyperplane to separate two classes • w and b are the parameters to define the hyperplane to separate the two classes.

  12. Classifier • Two user-definable parameters: • Error tolerance: - Smooth boundaryvs. non-smooth boundary • Tradeoff between training loss and regularization • Cost parameter C • Strictness: -Expect the white zone and the black zone contain no grey points -Related to error tolerance but non-symmetry

  13. Classifier • Cost parameter C: the cost of false positive C’: the cost of false negative C’ • Strictness parameter:

  14. Kernel Trick • RBF kernel as the kernel function • Classifier: • RBF kernel

  15. Matrix • Size: Size of the white and grey zone, which can be computed numerically based on the boundaries. • Boundary sharpness: • Fitness: How well the zone boundaries fit the data, or a confidence measure of the proximity zone classification.

  16. Classifier Questions?

  17. Boundary Sharpness and Consistency • Hardware setup: • TI CC2540 BLE dev boards (transmitting on 2.4 GHz at 0 dBm), • A pair of TelosB motes with 802.15.4-compliant TI CC24240 radio(transmitting on 2.4 GHz at 0 dBm) • A Impinj Speedway R1000 RFID reader (transmitting on 902 MHz at 8 dBm)

  18. Boundary Sharpness and Consistency • Parameters: • packet reception data is collected over a period of 200 seconds • WPRR using a windows size of 3 seconds and • Strictness parameter = 0.99 • Results:

  19. Boundary Sharpness and Consistency

  20. Human Obstacle Penetration • The user carries the receiver in the right pants pocket - calculate PRR from 500 packets as the user changes the body orientation by 90 each round at each distance

  21. Additional Metrics • Signal propagation and geometry: RFID antennas usually have a radiation angle less than 180 degrees • Form Factor and Costs: RFID can produce a more consistent and smaller grey zone 802.15.4 and BLE have advantages in both form factor and costs.

  22. Evaluation Questions?

  23. LIVESYNERGY PLATFORM • Pulse Transmitter:(use AC power) Four primary hardware • microcontroller (MCU) and radio • magnetic transmitter tuned at 125kHz • Energy metering • mechanical relay foractuation.

  24. LIVESYNERGY PLATFORM • Link Receiver: ( battery-powered) Three primary hardware 9.2cm ×5.8cm × 2.3cm enclosure • MCU and radio • 3D magnetic coil • wake up chip

  25. Boundary Sharpness and Consistency

  26. Body orientation vs. distance • human body has very little impact on the MI signal propagation

  27. Additional Metrics • Geometry: two dimensions extends to all directions, covering 360◦ • Range: maximum range (i.e., radius) is around 5m

  28. APPLICATION DEPLOYMENT Diners enter the cafeteria from the entrance at the lower left corner at different times

  29. Experment • Each diner takes a different route and visits various food counters on the way • Recorded a video as the customers walk around the cafeteria purchasing food. - Use video timestamps

  30. Result

  31. Summary • Values: • Propose methodologies and systematically compare the proximity zones • Deploying LiveSynergy in an real-world application • Future? • MI still can implement in mobile phone…

More Related