280 likes | 494 Views
V.Nikolaenko, IHEP Protvino Used Z0+jets AOD DataSets after ALPGEN Produced D3PD using EWPA vsn 3.32 Np0_merge_tid060297_tid060298.root Np1_merge_tid060726_tid060727.root Np2_merge_tid060299_tid060300.root Np3_merge_tid060728_tid060729.root Np4_merge_tid061150_tid061151.root
E N D
V.Nikolaenko, IHEP Protvino Used Z0+jets AOD DataSets after ALPGEN Produced D3PD using EWPA vsn 3.32 Np0_merge_tid060297_tid060298.root Np1_merge_tid060726_tid060727.root Np2_merge_tid060299_tid060300.root Np3_merge_tid060728_tid060729.root Np4_merge_tid061150_tid061151.root Np5_merge_tid060301_tid060302.root Z0→µµ and Charged tracks
LHC predictions (R.Field) Rick Field – Florida/CDF/CMS
Expected statistics • At √s=10 TeV and LUMI=100 ev/pb • Z0→µ+µ- and partons at pt>20 GeV • Z incl N= 114 300 PYTHIA • Z+Np0 90 000 AlpgenJimmy LO • Z+Np1 20 500 • Z+Np2 6 900 • Z+Np3 2 200 • W+Np0 2155 000 • WZ+ZZ c.s. at 14/10/7 TeV→ 50/31/18 pb
muons and Z0 • Page 6: a) muons pseudorapidity ( Np0 ) • b) m(µ+µ- ) • 81.2<m(µ+µ- )<101.2 used as Z0; • c) Pt of reconstructed Z0; • d) rapidity Y of Z0;
Tracks and muons • Events in the Z0 mass band kept; • Page 9 • a) Np0 sample, total number of tracks and the number of tracks used in Vert Fit • b) the same for Np3 sample; • c) φ-angle difference between µ and track • d) η-difference ( in degres) • Muon tracks are excluded from track sample (if both diff. of φ and η less than 0.5 deg.)
Tracks distributions • Page 12: • a) distribution on the φ-angle is NOT flat; • this is strange. • b) a clear correlation between d-impact parameter and the φ-angle is observed • Comment: the d-impact parameter at AOD is calculated for the “vertex” at (X,Y)=(0,0); • It should be recalculated for the reconstructed prim. vertex
Beamspot in (X,Y) plane Beamspot is shifted
METFinal for Np0 sample pt and φ-distribution for the missing mom. vector; the φ-distribution is NOT flat
Tracks and Z0 in the central region • Selection criteria applied for next distributions: • -0.5 < η(Z0)< 0.5; • -1.0 < η(track)< 1.0;
Summary • A dependence of “primary” track reconstruction efficiency on the φ angle is observed; also MET φ distribution is not flat. • Expected correlation between the Pt of Z0 and tracks Pt sum in the Away sector is seen. • To do: • -Reconstruction efficiency and purity should be studied in details • -Look for BG MC samples
References • WZ+jets meetings 16 Apr (A.Miagkov), 21 Jul (O.Zenin) http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=60149 and confId=47812 • Joined CMS-ATLAS-LHCb-ALICE meeting http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceDisplay.py?confId=65178 • ATLAS UE-study page in preparation: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasProtected/UnderlyingEvent
Backup slides Mean track energy vs R-parameter (in degrees)
Suggested UE Reference Plots (with Min-Bias Trigger) • Average Nchg and average PTsum in the "toward", "away", "transverse" region as defined by the leading charged particle, PTmax, • and as defined by the leading charged particle jet, chgjet#1, (anti-KT algorithm, d = 0.5) with PTmin = 0.5 GeV/c and PTmin = 0.9 GeV/c and |eta|< 1
Suggested ATLAS/CDF plots from early LHC data (cont.) • The average Nchg and average PTsum in the "toward", "away", "transverse" region would be plotted versus the PT of the object that was used to define the three regions (i.e. PTmax or PT(chgjet#1)).