1 / 27

Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS.

Cohabitation. FuzzyHeterogeneous, includes:Post-marriage (pre- and post-divorce)Pre-marriagePost widowhoodEvolving

debra
Download Presentation

Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

    1. Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes and intentions in the BHPS. Ernestina Coast

    2. Cohabitation Fuzzy Heterogeneous, includes: Post-marriage (pre- and post-divorce) Pre-marriage Post widowhood Evolving “a moving target” 1980s “alternative lifestyle”

    4. Good large-scale descriptive data on incidence and trends Representative attitudinal surveys Empirical gap: cohabitees US research emerging qualitative research survey data relationship intentions and attitudes longitudinal data – collected while subjective state exists systematic empirical investigation of social change

    5. Normative attitudes Changing social norms around marriage Deinstitutionalisation of marriage (Cherlin, 1994) Démariage (Thery, 1994), Disestablishment of marriage (Coontz, 2004, quoting Cott).

    6. BHPS normative attitudes “Living together outside of marriage is always wrong” 1992, 1994, 1996 “It is alright for people to live together even if they have no interest in considering marriage” 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004

    8. Percentage distribution of youths aged 11-15 years response to the question statement “Living together outside of marriage is always wrong”, BHPS 1994-2005

    10. Social acceptance of cohabitation well-established Moved from deviant to normative behaviour Acceptance likely to increase Cohort replacement Socialisation Social diffusion

    11. British Household Panel Survey (BHPS) Annual since 1991 Approx. 5,000 households Full interview with new partners

    14. Questions “We are interested in why you and your partner have chosen to live together rather than being married. Do you think there are any (dis)advantages in living as a couple, rather than being married?” If “Yes” “What do you think are the (dis)advantages of living as a couple?”

    15. Question: Future intentions “Obviously you cannot say for certain what will happen, but could you please look at this card and read out the number of the statement which you feel applies most closely to your current relationship? 1 Planning to marry 2 Probably get married at some point 3 Probably just keep living together without marrying 4 Have not really thought about the future 5 Other (specify) 6 Don’t know

    16. Supplementary Question “Even though you have no plans to marry at the moment, can you please look at this card and tell me how likely it is that you will ever get married to anyone in the future?” 1 Very likely 2 Likely 3 Unlikely 4 Very unlikely 5 Don’t know

    17. Interrogating the questions Grounded in reality Take account of circumstances rather than an expression of abstract desire Supplementary question on marriage expectation moves from current relationship to any future hypothetical relationship Phrased relative to marriage

    18. Percentage distribution of reported advantages of cohabitation relative to marriage, currently cohabiting respondents, 1998 and 2003.

    19. Percentage distribution of reported disadvantages of cohabitation relative to marriage, currently cohabiting respondents, 1998 and 2003.

    20. Percentage distribution of responses to the statement “How likely it is that you will ever get married to anyone in the future?”, by currently cohabiting, never married respondents with no plans to marry their current partner, by sex, 1998 and 2003.

    21. Percentage distribution of future relationship expectations, by duration of current cohabiting relationship (n=1,015 respondents), 2003

    22. % distribution of union expectations, by prior live-in relationship, 1998 and 2003

    23. Do individuals achieve their relationship expectations?

    24. Couple concordance / discordance Use only couples with full responses to questions Potential bias for homogeneity of response Only first-ever live-in relationships Interview effect? 1998 58% of individual interviews record 3rd party 89% coded as no influence exerted by the third party

    25. Do couples report conflicting relationship attitudes and expectations?

    26. % distribution couple expectations, 1998 and 2003, first unions only

    28. Discussion Analyses at the relationship level Living apart together (LAT) Assumption of rational choice Vague or underspecified goals Qualitative insights Cohabitation versus marriage or LAT or singlehood?

More Related