110 likes | 130 Views
Cornell Cooperative Extension’s role in natural resource management: a case study. Gary Goff, Sr. Extension Associate Peter Smallidge, NY Extension Forester, Sr. Extension Associate Thanks to: Jerry Andritz, NYS DEC Roger Monthey, US Forest Service. Issues Addressed
E N D
Cornell Cooperative Extension’s role in natural resource management: a case study Gary Goff, Sr. Extension Associate Peter Smallidge, NY Extension Forester, Sr. Extension Associate Thanks to: Jerry Andritz, NYS DEC Roger Monthey, US Forest Service
Issues Addressed • USFS and DEC, need to ensure that forest stewardship plans prepared with their funding: • n Are useful • n Meet standards • n Achieve uniformity • n Are prepared efficiently • n Reach “under-served” audiences
History • Private forest owners who participate in federally funded programs must have plans prepared by foresters. • Result: • n Too few plans met standards • n Foresters felt unduly encumbered • n Poor rate of complete plan implementation • n Few plans written, except where cost reimbursement was available • n F.S. training workshops couldn’t reach enough foresters
Cooperative Extension’s Unique Role n Reputation as unbiased and apolitical n Good record in developing and delivering educational programs n Could bring together forest owners, educators, and foresters n Can teach new technologies and resources for plan preparation n Can maintain availability of program deliverables over time
Program Objectives • Improve the long-term management of private forest lands • Improve the quality of plans and efficiency of plan preparers • Help ensure that state and federal programs reach all forest owning publics • Strengthen partnerships between DEC foresters, consultant foresters, and CCE educators and volunteers
Program Outline • Underlying Methodology: • Create forums where participants: • critique stewardship plans • cooperatively devise, learn, and acquire writing skills • access information resources • First Step: • Establish and engage steering committee and regional advisory teams: • state and private-sector foresters • CCE educators • forest owner volunteers
Program Outline cont’d. • Program Implementation and Deliverables: • Create stewardship webpage • Establish, train, and empower regional advisory teams • Regional teams interact locally • Workshops for foresters • Bulletin for educators
Forester Workshop Series Agenda • Reports from the Regional Advisory Teams • Overcoming barriers • Effective communications: “How to” exercises • Review and critique of sample plans • Introduction to F.S. “StewPlan” • Tour of Stewardship Webpage • Reaching under-served audiences • Evaluation
Workshop Evaluation • 102 total foresters, CCE educators, and forest owners attended • Attendees annually work with 9,000 forest owners who own/manage 300,000 acres • All participants indicated that they: • nwere more aware of the value of plans • nknow the expected standards • nwill be able to write better plans • nwill promote the use of plans • nwill be able to use new tools and • technologies • n will prepare 15% more plans • in 2003
Quotable Quotes “One thing you did right was to host this course. That in itself encourages plan preparation” “Informative, educational, offered more and new resources” “The writing workshop was very helpful” “Plan critique continues to be a good educational intervention” “Need more on silviculture!”
What we learned as educators • Cooperative Extension as a “third party” was able to engage tough crowd 2. The Master Forest Owner Volunteers were key in providing insight to the process 3. The County CCE Educators were both willing and capable of assisting with a “peripheral” topic 4. Regional teams are now “established” for additional programming.