390 likes | 486 Views
Physical Modeling of the Plucking Process on a String. By Bertrand Scherrer. Intro. Indirect acquisition of Instrumental Gesture. Intro. Indirect acquisition of Instrumental Gesture => Model of the interaction between the finger and the string. Intro.
E N D
Physical Modeling of the Plucking Process on a String By Bertrand Scherrer MUMT-614-Winter 2006
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Indirect acquisition of Instrumental Gesture
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Indirect acquisition of Instrumental Gesture => Model of the interaction between the finger and the string.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Finite Difference Approach [Cuzzucoli97,99]
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Finite Difference Approach [Cuzzucoli97,99] • Finger = Md mass, Kd stiffness, Rd damping • Newton's Law • Decoupling of Excitation / “Regular” Wave • Centered Finite Difference
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Fig11 [Cuzzucoli99]
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Finite Difference Approach [Cuzzucoli97,99] • Some data missing. • Written in Italian => hard for me to read. • Sound examples “clippy”
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Intro • Finite Difference Approach [Cuzzucoli97,99] • Plucking Process = • Damping • Excitation • Release
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 Structure • I- WDF Approach • II- Implementation and Results • III- Conclusion
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach a- Pakarinen05 Summary b- Why a Damper ? c- Reflectance of a Damper d- Connecting the Finger to the String
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach a- Pakarinen05 Summary Model of “Flageolet” tones using WDF damper to simulate the damping finger.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach b- Why a Damper ? Mass neglected <= no significant motion of finger due to the string. Stiffness neglected <= Compression small.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach c- Reflectance of a Damper ? R : damping coefficient R0: Impedance of the infinitesimal WG
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach c- Reflectance of a Damper ? Choosing R0=R :
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach d- Connection of the Finger to the String ? 3 port series adaptor
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach d- Connection of the Finger to the String ? Junction Velocity :
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 I-WDF Approach d- Connection of the Finger to the String ?
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results a- The string + Simulation Parameters b- Control Parameters c- Scattering Junction d- Results & Problems ...
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results a- The string + Simulation Parameters .fs =44 kHz .Tension obtained using : .L = 65cm .μ = 0.0059 kg/m
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results b- Control Parameters Re : Relative Excitation Position Rf : Relative Damping Position Zf/Zo : Normalized Damping Coeff.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results c- Scattering Junction
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results c- Scattering Junction Z1=Z2=Zo : Impedance of the string Z3=Zf : Impedance of the finger
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results c- Scattering Junction
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results c- Scattering Junction: Initialization see DamperSchema1-bis see DamperSchema1-ter => Simulate “Perfect Pluck”
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results d- Results Re = 0.1 , Rf =0.5 and Zf/Zo = 0.001, 0.003, 0.005
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results d- Results Re = 0.1 , Zf/Zo = 0.003 and Rf = 0.125 , 0.25 , 0.33, 0.5
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results d- Results Feedforward Comb Filtering => Problem !
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 II-Implementation and Results d- Results Linear variation of Zf/Zo with fixwd Re and Rf
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 III-Conclusion - Damping Phase: Solve Comb filtering effect problem ! - Excitation Phase: Not ideal but similar to “stick” phase in bowed strings + Angle of Excitation
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 III-Conclusion - Release Phase: Incorporate the fingerboard/fret collisions.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 References • Cuzzucoli G., Lombardo V.,"Physical Model of the Plucking Process in the Classical Guitar," in Proc. of the ICMC, pp. 172-179, San Francisco : International Computer Association, pp 172-179, 1997.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 References • Cuzzucoli G., Lombardo V.,"A Physical Model of the Classical Guitar, Including the Player's Touch," in Computer Music Journal, 23:2, pp52-69, MIT Press, 1999.
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 References • Pakarinen J., "Physical Model of Flageolet Tones in String Instruments," in EUSIPCO , Antalya, Turkey, September 4-8, 2005, http://www.acoustics.hut.fi/~jykke/publications.html
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 References • Smith, J. O. Physical Audio Signal Processing, “Wave Digital Filters” section, <http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Wave_Digital_Filters_I.html> • Smith, J. O. Physical Audio Signal Processing, “Moving Rigid Termination” section, http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Moving_Rigid_Termination.html
MUMT-614-Winter 2006 References • Smith, J. O. Physical Audio Signal Processing, “Bowed Strings” section,http://ccrma.stanford.edu/~jos/pasp/Bowed_Strings.html