1 / 14

Teleological Argument

Teleological Argument. James A. Van Slyke Azusa Pacific University . Teleological argument. The World exhibits intelligent purpose or order Therefore, there must be a divine intelligence or designer to account for the nature of the universe. Natural Theology. William Paley (1743-1805)

deepak
Download Presentation

Teleological Argument

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Teleological Argument James A. Van Slyke Azusa Pacific University

  2. Teleological argument • The World exhibits intelligent purpose or order • Therefore, there must be a divine intelligence or designer to account for the nature of the universe

  3. Natural Theology • William Paley (1743-1805) • “Watch” Argument • If we infer intelligent designers for general artifacts (Watch) • The universe is obviously more complex than a watch • Therefore, there must be an intelligent designer

  4. Creation and Theism • Four Views • Creationism • Intelligent Design • Theistic Evolution • Evolutionary Naturalism • Disagreement over the involvement of natural law and Divine intervention

  5. Understanding Divine Action • Providence • Keeps all thing in existence • Creatures are not independent existents • Without God, creatures would not continue to exist • Cooperative Providence – God works in, with, and through the created world

  6. Understanding Divine Action • Special providence • Acts performed to meet our needs “out of the ordinary” • Miracles • Special signs and actions of God that reveal his purposes

  7. Reading the Bible • Inerrancy • Free from error • Theological • Historical • Scientific • Infallibility • Free from error in terms of theological truth

  8. Creationism • Basic Principles • Sudden creation of the cosmos from nothing but Divine action • Insufficiency of evolution to explain development of all living beings • Changes occur only within fixed limits of originally created kinds of plants and animals

  9. Creationism • Basic Principles • No common descent; apes and humans have separate ancestry • Earth’s geology is explained by catastrophism, including a worldwide flood

  10. Intelligent Design Views • Connections to Natural Theology • Macroevolution ascribed to God’s intervention in natural history • Evolutionary theory provides an incomplete picture of the development of the cosmos

  11. Intelligent Design Views • Phillip Johnson – Darwin on Trial • Evidence of Design in Natural Order, not just random chance and natural law • Critiques • Gaps in the fossil record • Lack of evidence supporting speciation • Evolutionary theory is actually a form of natural philosophy

  12. Intelligent Design Views • Evolution leads to a Naturalistic philosophy • No purpose to existence • Evolution is the only theory to explain life • Morality • Religion • Goal of human life

  13. Intelligent Design Views • Michael Behe – Darwin’s Black Box • Committed Evolutionist • There exist structures that are irreducibly complex • Particular natural structures would not exist if one part was removed • Thus these particular structures could not have arisen through standard Darwinian processes • Internal workings of cells • Immune system • Therefore must be an intelligent designer

  14. Intelligent Design Views • William Dembski – “The Design Inference” • Complexity from a mathematical and philosophical view • Produced an algorithm that measures whether “specified complexity” exists • Complexity means that the event or object cannot be explained by arising from chance • Complex structures cannot be explained by any natural laws, known or unknown

More Related