1 / 6

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [ Peak-to-Average Ratio Analysis of QPSK, OQPSK, and 64-QAM for 802.15.3 ] Date Submitted: [ 25 April 2001 ] Source: [ Stanley K. Ling and Susumu Hara ] Company [ Intel Corporation ]

deidra
Download Presentation

Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Peak-to-Average Ratio Analysis of QPSK, OQPSK, and 64-QAM for 802.15.3] Date Submitted: [25 April 2001] Source: [Stanley K. Ling and Susumu Hara] Company [Intel Corporation] Address [9750 Goethe Road, M/S LOC 3/8, Sacramento, CA 95827] Voice:[(916) 855-5000], FAX: [(916) 854-2809], E-Mail:[stan.k.ling@intel.com and susumu.hara@intel.com] Re: [] Abstract: [This contribution presents simulation results of OQPSK vs. QPSK for 802.15.3 PHY. QPSK is supported because it retains the CAZAC properties of the preamble.] Purpose: [For information only.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

  2. Simulation Model • 3rd and 5th order non-linearity modeled in PA Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

  3. System Parameters • Parameters Symbol rate: 11 Mbaud SRRC alpha: 0.3 SRRC span: +/- 4 symbols Modulation: QPSK, OQPSK, and 64-QAM • RF architecture, sample rate, and center frequency chosen to simplify the simulation model Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

  4. Simulation Results • The difference in Peak-to-Average Ratio (PAR) between QPSK and OQPSK is ~0.5 dB at the PA input. Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

  5. Simulation Results • QPSK requires 3.2 dB back-off from P_1dB • OQPSK requires 2.7 dB back-off from P_1dB • PABO calculated for identical output power Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

  6. Conclusions • PAR reduction of OQPSK modulation is less than 0.5 dB over QPSK modulation. • PA back-off is reduced by 0.5 dB for OQPSK. • This slight reduction eliminates CAZAC properties of the preamble: gain slight reduction in complexity of RF design at the expense of incurring large increase in complexity of BB/algorithm design. • QPSK should be used instead of OQPSK for the preamble, header, and 22 Mbit/s data mode. Stanley K. Ling, Intel Corporation

More Related