440 likes | 572 Views
Accretion discs: models vs reality. Jean-Pierre Lasota. Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris. Jean-Alain Marck. Dwarf novae. SS Cyg. Cataclysmic Binary Stars. red dwarf. “hot spot”. accretion disc. white dwarf. Discs (in CVs) are: Keplerian
E N D
Accretion discs: models vs reality Jean-Pierre Lasota Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris
Dwarf novae SS Cyg
Cataclysmic Binary Stars red dwarf “hot spot” accretion disc white dwarf
Discs (in CVs) are: • Keplerian • geometrically thin (but not “infinitely” thin) • not always in equilibrium (thermal and/or viscous) • (almost ?) flat • non-adiabatic (radiate like hell !) • not always (?) axisymmetric • non-selfgravitating • jetless !
Doppler tomography: 2D Steeghs 2001
MODELS De Villiers et al. 2004 ? Balbus 2005
Radial For subsonic turbulence equivalent to b prescription (Duschl et al 2000)
Local limit-cycle quiescence Menou, Hameury, Stehle 1998
* * Smak 2000
new old Hameury 2001
Proposed solution (Gammie & Menou 1997) Cannot work: there is accretion during quiecence !
Superoutbursts Superhumps VW Hyi V436 Cen (Semeniuk 1980) (AAVSO)
“Standard model”: superhumps due to tidal, eccentric instability. (3:1 eccentric inner Lindblad resonance; Lubow 1991) Condition: Murray & Armitage 1998 Osaki: Superoutbursts due to a tidal-thermal instability
Fully radiative Isothermal Kornet & Rożyczka (1998)
Superoutburst in U Gem Superhumps in U Gem !(Smak 2005)
TV Col …and in any case no need for tidal-thermal instability in LMXB outbursts
Conclusions • CVs are the best systems for studying accretion discs • Observations will bring a tremendous amount of data on disc structure • There are (at least) two kinds of “viscosity” • Numerical simulations will play an important role but thinking should not be abandoned • The role of tidal forces has to be re-examined • 3D is essential but without radiative cooling included it might be of little relevance