1 / 22

Biointerfacial Characterization rci.rutgers/~moghe/583.html

Biointerfacial Characterization www.rci.rutgers.edu/~moghe/583.html. BME 125:583. Lecture 1 Sep. 7, 2006 Prof. Prabhas Moghe. PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS. P. Moghe. •  Bulk and Surface Properties Can Control Tissue Interface Dynamics After In Vivo Implantation of Biomaterials.

delbert
Download Presentation

Biointerfacial Characterization rci.rutgers/~moghe/583.html

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Biointerfacial Characterization www.rci.rutgers.edu/~moghe/583.html BME 125:583 Lecture 1 Sep. 7, 2006 Prof. Prabhas Moghe

  2. PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS P. Moghe •  Bulk and Surface Properties Can Control Tissue Interface Dynamics After In Vivo Implantation of Biomaterials • Bulk and Surface Material Characteristics are Property Dependent - These Features must be known prior to any Medical Application! e.g. does the application require load-bearing materials? does the application require a soft, resorbable material?

  3. BULK PROPERTIES - MATERIAL DISTINCTIONS - Interatomic forces - Atomic structure based material classes- Metals, Ceramics, Glasses, Polymers -Microstructure -Interatomic bonds -3-D atomic clusters -Crystallite structure -Grain size and phase changes -Mechanical Properties of Materials

  4. SURFACE PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS tissue fluid and proteins cell BIOMATERIAL • Surface properties determine biomaterial-tissue interface. • Properties: Biocompatibility Topography/Roughness Wettability Surface Mobility Crystallinity Chemical Composition

  5. Methods to Characterize Biomaterial Surfaces http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~moghe/Bioprop.html

  6. Surface Contact Energetics -Molecules exterior to materials are most accessible to adjacent phases as well as incoming cells (Surface Reaction) -There is always a positive energy necessary to create a unit area of surface. Systems reach equilibrium by minimizing this surface area/energy. In solids, this happens by changing the nature of interface to one with lower (lowest) energy. -Energy minimization occurs when groups/chains in polymer rearrange to yield lowest interfacial energy. e.g. hydrogel migrates to/from surface of a graft copolymer exposed to water/dry air.

  7. lv  sl sv Determination of Surface Energetics • Excess free energy per unit surface area is surface tension • Young’s Theory of the Spreading of Liquid Droplet: sv sl lv cos  At equilibrium, surface energy = +

  8. Techniques to measure contact angles  air Static Drop Capillary air-bubble  DuNouy Ring or Wilhelmy plate

  9. Wilhelmy Technique for Contact Angle Analysis Electrobalance Recorder Lid Measuring Plate/Rod Measuring Cell liquid Motorized Platform Clamp support

  10. q q Wilhelmy Plate Method for Contact Angle Measurement F 1 2 F 3 F P, perimeter, =2(t+w) mg gL gL gL gL mg mg Fb gL where Fb = rL Vimm g Cos q - Fb F = mg + p Both liquid surface tension & L/S/V contact angle can be computed First do experiment with fully wetting plate and find gL. Then mount biomaterial on the recording balance and find cosq.

  11. Ramé-Hart Goniometer Drop-Image Program: http://www.ramehart.com/goniometers/dropimagefinn.htm

  12. Dynamic Contact Angle Measurements Dynamic contact analysis is done by increasing or decreasing the drop volume until the three-phase boundary moves over the surface. ADVANCING CONTACT ANGLE RECEDING CONTACT ANGLE r a

  13. Contact Angle Hysteresis Difference between advancing and receding contact angle is called contact angle hysteresis. recession Buoyancy Slope Low hysteresis is obtained on well cleaned, non-interacting surfaces. advancement Force in out zero depth Immersion Depth

  14. HYSTERESIS LOOP FOR POLYMERIC BIOMATERIAL Buoyancy Slope A=>receding contact angle B=>advancing contact angle q receding A out 2 Force second cycle (red) 1 2 in 1 B zero depth q advancing Immersion Depth

  15. Zisman Method Critical Surface Tension Critical surface tension, c Complete spreading Cosq=1.0 Various liquids 0 Smaller Contact Angles  poly(ethylene):31 dyn/cm PTFE : 19 dyn/cm PVC : 41 dyn.cm Cosq=0 90 Stable Sessile Drop 10 20 30 40 50 60 lv Dynes/cm

  16. Thermodynamics of Spreading/Adhesion on Materials Interfacial free energy of adhesion = Cell-solid interfacial free energy - Cell-liquid interfacial free energy - Solid-liquid interfacial free energy. Fadh = cs - cl - sl If Fadh < 0, adhesion and spreading are energetically favorable Fadh and Substratum free energy (wettability) Fadh 50 100 s [erg. cm-2] Very hydrophobic substrates

  17. Biological Interactiveness & Biomaterial Critical Surface Tension Non-adhesive zone Biomaterials with good adhesion Relative biological interaction 20 30 40 80 Critical Surface Tension (dynes/cm) Baier, Adv. Chem. Ser. 145:1, 1975

  18. Industrial Products for Contact Angle Measurement • Advanced Surface Technology Products, Inc. • Computer-interfaced contact angle analysis • Cahn, Inc. • Dynamic Contact Angle Analysis • Zisman Method • Wilhelmy and DuNuoy Rings • KSV Limited, Finland • Digital Tensiometer (DR/W)

  19. Concerns in Contact Angle Measurements • The measurement is subjective • Surface roughness influences the contact analysis • Surface unevenness influences the results • The liquids used can be contaminated (reducing lv) • Liquids can reorient the surface structure • Liquids can absorb, swelling the surface • Liquids can dissolve the surface • Environment needs to be controlled carefully • Dynamic measurements have hysteresis

  20. Research Paper Discussion

  21. Relationship between substrate PEG content and surface hydrophobicityTziampazis, Kohn, and Moghe, Biomaterials 21:511, 2000

  22. Discussion

More Related