300 likes | 507 Views
MÉXICO M. Sc. JOSÉ LUIS FIGUEROA. @ditep. Background Main purpose of NDR Types of data Reach Problems Successes Lessons learned The way ahead. Background Basins. Background Production . Background Reserves (January 2009). 3P Total (billion boe) 43.6.
E N D
MÉXICO M. Sc. JOSÉ LUIS FIGUEROA
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Background Reserves (January 2009) 3P Total (billion boe) 43.6 Crude Oil (Billion barrels) Natural Gas (Trillion cf) 22.6 10.4 10.4 20.1 10.1 17.7 12.7 30.9
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Main purpose of NDR • NDR (@ditep) main purpose • E&P process optimization through the integration and delivery of technical data • Government legal processes and reporting optimization through the association of technical data to financial information • @ditep group main purpose • Integrate, maintain and move technical data along the E&P process
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Types of Data GIS Coastline, blocks, safety zones etc Field outlines Pipelines Surface Facilities Cultural Infrastructure Environment Licences and permits Surface Cultural data Well information Rocks & Fluids Geology 2D and 3D Seismic Logs Drilling Production Reservoirs Facilities Documents Subsurface
Integrated information 2D & 3D seismic coverage Protected Areas Fields Surface facilities
Cantarell Oilfield Operations Cantarell Field
Cantarell Oilfield Operations
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Reach Reynosa AREN ATG PozaRica-Altamira CNH SENER Veracruz Holoc-Temoa México Villahermosa 5 Presidentes AREM Macuspana KMZ APCH Muspac Cantarell Litoral Bellota-Jujo Samaria Head quarters ARES Assets
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Problems • The non-stop proliferation of Excel´s, Power Point Presentations, Private Data Sets, etc. as ways to gather and keep data. • Who owns the data? Frequently there is not a clear responsibility of who must certificate or validate the information • The high level executives lack of real understanding of the challenge. • DM/IM as a Business Strategy, not an IT project • The proliferation of technical software (changing portfolio of applications) • Lack of standard transactions systems • Data cleaning, data validation, data certification, data baggage, good data, not so good data and so on, especially on subsurface information. Data is never a 100%. Find a level of acceptance • Standards? Unique Identifier? Common formats? • Cost • Metrics • Hard to get confidence of final users • Achieving completeness of the Assets data collection
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Successes • A good number of data sets Centralized (Opportunity to improve quality and control) • The successful termination of projects related to data collection in the field; projects ready to be implemented nationwide (Ej Production data, rock samples analysis, pipelines maintenance) • The recognition by high authorities of the value of the information contained in @ditep • The day to day increase in the number of users, currently 50% of the total E&P population (about 2000 users) • Recognition by regulatory authorities of @ditep as a means to report and control Oil and Gas information
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
Lessons learned • Constant report about Integration of data to promote teamwork collaboration and sustain commitment • Top management support is Key • Strategy must be long term and uninterrupted • A sense of ownership must be endorsed among users • Improve friendly Data Access and Delivery • Subsurface data is never 100%. We have to accept that resistance from some users will continue, so find a way to increase the level of acceptance. • Data loading is a major task.* • Be realistic - it will be more difficult than you think.* • Dealing with a 100 years backlog is difficult* • One database centralised is better than two, three, four or “n” distributed *From Stewart Robinson-CDA-UK
@ditep • Background • Main purpose of NDR • Types of data • Reach • Problems • Successes • Lessons learned • The way ahead
The way ahead • We are currently working on key aspects of the @ditep strategy towards the future: • Complete the loading of historical data as it is still slow and incomplete in some assets • Continue working on the certification and validation of the data, so that it is used as a trusted source of information by current and new users • We have to put an extra effort to revert rejection by the Petro technical Specialists when it comes to “Data Publishing, Sharing and above all Accepting” • Continue working to achieve standardization and integration with the E&P process • The introduction of new technologies to upgrade the quality and performance of the data base and visualization software among others.
MÉXICO M. Sc. JOSÉ LUIS FIGUEROA