1 / 14

Conceptual boundaries of real property A socio-technical analysis of the cadastral system

This presentation analyzes the socio-technical aspects of cadastral systems, focusing on conceptual boundaries and complexities of real property ownership. It delves into existing theories and design considerations in engineering, social sciences, and physics. The discussion explores the interaction between social and technical elements in designing and improving cadastral systems, emphasizing the importance of trust, societal norms, and process design. The conclusion highlights the need to consider dynamic systems in addressing intentionality and non-designable elements.

dempseyc
Download Presentation

Conceptual boundaries of real property A socio-technical analysis of the cadastral system

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Conceptual boundaries of real propertyA socio-technical analysis of the cadastral system Presentation Aalborg Maarten Ottens Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management

  2. Existing concepts/theories regarding (complex, technical) systems • Social sciences : Actor-Network Theory, descriptive, Callon, Latour • All elements are taken as intentional • Physics : Complex Systems Theory, predictive • Nonlinear dynamics, modelling systems by modelling the elements with simple rules and interacting • Engineering sciences : Systems Engineering, prescriptive • All elements as rational, logic, within laws of physics and logic

  3. Static and dynamic system views • Static system view, complexity in amount of elements, sorts of elements and relations • Dynamic system view, complexity in phases in design approach, e.g. life-cycle design Structure Process Structure Process Structure

  4. Actor 2 2 Actor iii ii iv Social element 3 1 Technical element v i vi Social element 3 1 Technical element Basis model (static) • Intentionality • Functioning depending on laws of nature • Social versus nature laws

  5. An example Systems differ qua involvement of actors and social factors:

  6. person owner right society land owned What is the cadastral system • Ownership of real property

  7. actors in cadastral system • Physical humans (intentionality) (professionals/users) • Organizations (collective int.) (formal) • Groups (informal) • Owner (user) • Companies (Professionals: surveyors, lawyers; Financial institutes: Banks, ..; Computing: Software and Services;) • Authorities (Government, judiciary (and police); government officers;) • Schools (Universities etc) • Groups (squatters, social movements)

  8. social elements in cadastral system

  9. technical elements in cadastral system • Satellites • Computers and networks • Coordinate measuring devices • Databases, archives; documents and maps • Markers (boundary, control points, sign posts) Are markers symbols/signs?

  10. Designing: What are the boundaries of the static cadastral system? (What to be designed?) Essential for functioning (& open for design) Trust (in others, in authorities), sense of “beruf”

  11. Designing: How to design? Engineers: if it exists, use it, don’t design it, but if needed improve it (standards, open source software) This is then only applied to elements considered open for design. In cadastral systems however, certain other elements are so important to the functioning that they need to be designed/improved as well. For social elements the process design seems more important then the product design

  12. Discussion: theory • Social elements have material grounding (documents, boundary marks, legislation, ..) abstract social versus physical technical • Is there a conceptual distinction between formal and informal social elements as being designed and emerged? • Markers, social or technical elements? Data?

  13. Discussion: designing • For design next to structure also process design is needed. Engineers do it, but only for technology • Social elements are in Cadastral systems more important then in ‘technical’ socio-technical systems like transportation systems for functioning • The classical sense of engineering design does not work for cadastral systems, because informal social elements and trust etc are not taken into account

  14. Conclusion • To deal with intentions and ‘non-designable’ elements we must look at the dynamic system Because these elements are merely influenced then designed, and influencing happens through processes rather then designed structures.

More Related