1 / 51

Spiral CT and PACS How to Arrange a Marriage

Spiral CT and PACS How to Arrange a Marriage. Gary J. Wendt, MD, MBA Vice Chair of Informatics University of Wisconsin - Madison Department of Radiology. or What is PGP and IHE?. IHE and PGP. Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise Presentation of Grouped Procedures.

dena
Download Presentation

Spiral CT and PACS How to Arrange a Marriage

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spiral CT and PACSHow to Arrange a Marriage Gary J. Wendt, MD, MBA Vice Chair of Informatics University of Wisconsin - Madison Department of Radiology

  2. orWhat is PGP and IHE?

  3. IHE and PGP • Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise • Presentation of Grouped Procedures

  4. What is the Clinical Problem? • Multislice CT and high speed MR generate HUGE quantities of images quickly • 3000+ Images • Too large for virtual memory in a 32 bit operating system • Multiple orders and / or requested procedures done in one acquisition • Entire exam may not read by one radiologist • Clinicians often not interested in entire exam • Cant track status of each requested procedure

  5. What is PGP? • IHE definition: Presentation of Grouped Procedures (PGP) provides a mechanism for facilitating viewing images and reporting on individual requested procedures that have been fulfilled by a single acquisition • Single CT may consist of CT Head, Chest, Abdomen, Pelvis • This is done as one exam acquisition and generates one dataset

  6. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics – UW Health • 800 Physicians • 30 Radiologists • 463 bed main hospital • 60 clinics • 6 large clinics with digital modalities • Over 250,000 exams per year • HIS / RIS with Web based EMR and integrated DICOM Modality Worklist

  7. University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics – UW Health

  8. UW PACS History • Incremental approach to PACS implementation • US mini-PACS • 99 – CR softcopy reading from 2 remote clinics • 98-99 – initial evaluation of web interface to digital modalities

  9. UW PACS History • 99 - 2 new large clinics filmless (except mammo) • 99 - 00 - PACS RFP • 5/00 - Selected PACS Vendor • 2 softcopy workstations for CT/MR • 11/00 – Install PACS archives and servers • 2000 – Spiral CT • 3/01 – 12 Additional diagnostic workstations installed • 2001 – Multislice CT • 11/02 – 55 Diagnostic workstations • Over 150 clinical review workstations • 11/02 – 1 Spiral and 7 Multislice CT

  10. Workflow at the University of Wisconsin - Madison Web Based EMR WISCR-IT HIS/RIS Siemens Report Data Modality Worklist Dictation & Electronic Signature MPPS HL7 – ADT, orders, reports Image Data (SC) CT GE Lightspeed PACS Radiology and Clinical ALI / McKesson PACS Archive 307 TB ADIC Scalar 1000 GSPS PGP MR GE Signa Web Review Workstations PACS Offsite Archive 307 TB ADIC Scalar 1000 CR – Fuji DR - GE Thick Client Diagnostic Workstations US PACS Office and Teaching UltraVisual NM Thin Client JAVA Workstations Mammo VL Visible Light XA/RF

  11. PGP Details • IHE Template defines • Order • Requested Procedure • Scheduled Procedure • Acquisition • Store • Report • This is not a one to one relation

  12. Several Possible Combinations • Non grouped case • Grouped acquisition • Grouped acquisition with physical split • Grouped acquisition with logical split

  13. Non-grouped Case • Common in older devices • Similar to a film based environment • Don’t get benefits of newer devices

  14. Grouped Acquisition • The real problem child • 1000+ image series • 3000+ image exams • Impossible to deal with in a film environment • Difficult to deal with in a radiology department • Potentially devastating to electronic enterprise distribution

  15. Grouped Acquisition With Physical Split • Potential solution • No easy option to modify split if the initial split is wrong • Duplicates many images – 120 – 140% • 100% - need to store entire original in case the splits were wrong • 20-40% for overlap • Not easy to review entire exam

  16. Grouped Acquisition With Logical Split • The best solution • No duplication of images • Easy to modify virtual split • New GSPS • Potential to re-combine multiple virtual splits

  17. What will PGP do for me? • Multiple orders and /or requested procedures done in one acquisition • Entire exam may not be read by one radiologist • Clinicians often not interested in entire exam • Enable tracking status of each requested procedure • Reduce impact of huge datasets on clinical and system infrastructure

  18. Multiple Orders and / or Requested Procedures Done in One Acquisition A single exam acquisition may consist of several requested procedures Trauma scan may have head, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine Grouping / splitting portion of PGP Done at modality Should (Must) be on worklist at time of exam

  19. Entire Exam May Not be Read by One Radiologist • Common in academic and large private practices where there are sub-specialists • Neuro, body, chest… • PGP virtual or physical splits could present a problem with too fine of a granularity • Splitting abdomen and pelvis and requiring that each be opened and read separately • Virtual splits would be easiest to solve by combining the GSPS objects and opening multiple virtual splits as one larger combined exam

  20. Clinicians Often Not Interested in Entire Exam • The orthopedic surgeon does not want to wait for and look at the first 2000 images of the head, chest, abdomen… to find the 50 images of the fractured hip

  21. Enable Tracking Status of Each Requested Procedure • Performed procedure step (PPS) for each requested procedure can now be tracked by the HIS / RIS, PACS and modalities • Radiologists know what needs to be read • Clinicians can track status of exams – decreases phone / pager tag

  22. Reduce impact of huge datasets on clinical and system infrastructure • Clinical impact • System impact • Network • Workstation hardware • Diagnostic workstations • Clinical review workstations • Web viewer

  23. Barriers to Clinical PGP Implementation • PGP requires that worklist entries are present prior to exam • Implementation on modality • Implementation on PACS • RIS support

  24. PGP Requires that Worklist Entries are Present Prior to Exam • Problem with unidentified patients (e.g. trauma patients) • Potential solutions • Manual entering of orders on RIS • Auto generation of predefined set of orders for unidentified trauma patient – cancel orders not done • Generation of new orders on modality console • Generation of GSPS after the study is sent

  25. Manual Entry of Orders on RIS • Time consuming • Technicians often not prepared or able to enter orders • May delay scan

  26. Auto Generation of Predefined Set of Orders for Unidentified Patient • Have RIS auto generate a “Top 10” entry of orders for trauma or unidentified patients • Cancel orders that are not done at a later time (or on the scanner) • Minimal user intervention • Orders ready before patient gets to scanner

  27. Generation of New Orders / Scheduled Procedures on Modality Console • Best solution • Radiology workflow is often driven at (or by) the scanners • Would require HIS/RIS vendors to acknowledge that they are not the center of the universe

  28. Generation of GSPS After the Study is Sent to the PACS • Possible but does little to resolve workflow issues in a trauma environment

  29. Implementation on modality • Prospective – at time images are prescribed on the topogram • Retrospective – after axial / spiral images are acquired • Separate console – potential add-on for older systems

  30. Implementation on PACS • Get multiple “In-Box” entries • Accession number for each performed procedure • All point to same image set

  31. RIS support • Need multiple unique orders for patient • DICOM Modality Worklist

  32. UW Proposed Solution • Integrated selection of images for PGP on scanner console • Multiple in-box entries on PACS • Worklist from RIS or PACS

  33. Vendor Partners at UW • General Electric – CT and MR • ALI – PACS, DICOM Worklist • Siemens / SMS - RIS

  34. Implementation Plan • Define user interface requirements • Scanner • PACS • Vendor implementation • Lab to lab testing • Preliminary install on one scanner and PACS test server • Refine user interface • Test RIS vs. PACS Worklist • Full production PACS and scanner implementation

  35. Current Status of PGP Implementation at the UW • Lab to lab testing completed • Initial CT scanner install • Test PACS system • Refine workflow issues

  36. PGP on the CT Scanner • Select multiple orders on modality worklist • Scanner generates MPPS at start and end and groups scans • Retrospective generation of GSPS objects to do virtual split

  37. PGP on the CT Scanner

  38. PGP on the CT Scanner

  39. PGP on the CT Scanner

  40. Example of PGP In-Box

  41. Abdomen

  42. Chest

  43. Full Exam

  44. Save Presentation State on Workstation – While Reading Exam

  45. Save Presentation State on Workstation – As Exam Close

  46. Summary • PGP will enable filmless and paperless PACS operation • Exam can be effectively read by multiple radiologists • Clinicians can access only the parts of the exam they are interested in • Enable tracking status of each requested procedure • Reduce impact of huge datasets on clinical and system infrastructure

More Related