1 / 7

Developing Composition Tree Visualizer for TextBE

Developing Composition Tree Visualizer for TextBE. Vit Zuraida, IK 2007. TextBE. Integrare: graphical editor TextBE: textual representation that automate graphical representation TextBE run on Eclipse Galileo SR2 Modeling Tools

denali
Download Presentation

Developing Composition Tree Visualizer for TextBE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Developing Composition Tree Visualizer for TextBE Vit Zuraida, IK 2007

  2. TextBE • Integrare: graphical editor • TextBE: textual representation that automate graphical representation • TextBE run on Eclipse Galileo SR2 Modeling Tools • Existing functional: stabil textual representation for BT, BT visualizer • Functional will be added: hiding deleted nodes, indication of active components, model validation, simulator, CT visualizer, etc

  3. TextBE Design • Textual specification  EMFText  editor • Textual representation  editor • View  ATL  graphviz model • Graphviz model  EclipseGraphviz  SVG  SVGEclipse  image • JET  generate code

  4. Composition Tree • Controlled vocabulary  aliases (added, deleted) • CT composition of component • Optional • Needed for developing a large scale or complex system or developing a system with many developer.

  5. CT Vs BT • Infrormation represented by CT Vs BT BT  detail sequential behavior CT  composition of components with each attribute, state, event, and other informastions related to the component • Building process of ICT Vs IBT IBT  integrate all requirment begavior tree ICT  if there is any new information added in RBT, add it to existion composition tree too • Branching type CT Vs BT BT  same branching type CT  different branching type

  6. CT Notation • Train Station Case Study For an example of CT notation, see https://kode.poss.or.id/attachments/download/647/02-Train-Station-Composition_Tree.pdf The behavior tree related to that example can be seen in https://kode.poss.or.id/attachments/download/310/Train_Station.pdf

  7. Reference

More Related