1 / 5

Context: BIOC2000 is a problem class

Producing and implementing new forms of engaging, high-benefit assessment for undergraduate science students Susan Rowland. Context: BIOC2000 is a problem class. Demographics ~500 sophomore students in 24 programs Required course for ~ 80% of cohort

denise
Download Presentation

Context: BIOC2000 is a problem class

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Producing and implementing new forms of engaging, high-benefit assessment for undergraduate science students Susan Rowland

  2. Context: BIOC2000 is a problem class • Demographics • ~500 sophomore students in 24 programs • Required course for ~80% of cohort • ~15% are interested in a biochemistry career • Problem • Many students in this class lack motivation and interest in the material. They do poorly in exams and struggle with the current assessment items. The course receives low evaluations by students. I tried adding extra support measures, but that didn’t work too well. • Research Question • 1) Can we use UG science student input to produce and implement new forms of assessment that they see as engaging and high-benefit? • 2) How well does this new assessment methodology work in comparison to the current system?

  3. Research question – a deeper analysis 1) Other than grades, what do the students want from their second year biochemistry and molecular biology course experience? 2) We consistently test students with “science centric” methods. Are students receptive to the idea of altering assessment regimes to provide student-empowering mixed-ability learning opportunities while maintaining academic rigour and minimizing “costs”? 3) What ideas do students have for new assessment items that they see as relevant and valuable to them? 4) How does this type of implementation work in a system where assessment choice is unfamiliar to students and frowned upon by faculty?

  4. Why is this question interesting? Motivation = expectancy x value Motivation Value (interest) Expectancy (aptitude) High intrinsic motivation behaviours

  5. Research methodology Short term (6 – 8 months) 1) A review of student receptiveness to assessment change - large-scale survey, mostly Likert scale. Help on questions is welcomed. 2) Student comment on the current “benefits” of assessment - open ended questions on same survey + focus group 3) Student input into the design of new assessment tools for BIOC2000 - workshop with volunteer students from past BIOC2000 cohorts 4) An emergent model for delivery of assessment choice for the students - for presentation to fellow faculty. They need to be convinced. Longer term (9 – 12 months) 1) Delivery of a new empowered assessment set to BIOC2000 2) Collation of assessment results + comparison to previous year’s student responses to the course 3) Collation of student response to new assessment methods + comparison to previous year’s student responses to the course 4) Presentation of new system of assessment to fellow faculty

More Related