1 / 30

F.H. DuBose, R. Golub, E. Korobkina , C.M. O’Shaughnessy,

Measuring the Neutron Lifetime with Magnetically Trapped Neutrons. F.H. DuBose, R. Golub, E. Korobkina , C.M. O’Shaughnessy, G.R. Palmquist, Pil-Neyo Seo , P.R. Huffman (NC State Univ.); L. Yang, J.M. Doyle (Harvard Univ.); K.J. Coakley, H.P. Mumm, A.K. Thompson (NIST);

denzel
Download Presentation

F.H. DuBose, R. Golub, E. Korobkina , C.M. O’Shaughnessy,

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring the Neutron Lifetime with Magnetically Trapped Neutrons • F.H. DuBose, R. Golub, E. Korobkina , C.M. O’Shaughnessy, • G.R. Palmquist, Pil-Neyo Seo, P.R. Huffman (NC State Univ.); • L. Yang, J.M. Doyle (Harvard Univ.); • K.J. Coakley, H.P. Mumm, A.K. Thompson (NIST); • G.L. Yang, (NIST/U of Maryland); • S.K. Lamoreaux (LANL) Particle And Nuclei International Conference, Santa Fe, Oct. 28, 2005

  2. p D 4He n D What Can We Learn from Neutron Beta Decay? • The Standard Model • Big-Bang Nucleosynthesis

  3. Status of Test of Electroweak SM

  4. Neutron Lifetime Data PDG Data + new Data P.E. Spivak, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 94, 1 (1988): 891+- 9 (s) W. Mampe et al., PRL 63, 593 (1989): 887.6 +- 3.0 W. Paul et al., Z. Phys. 45, 25 (1989): 877 +- 10 V.V. Nezvizhevskii et al., JETP 75, 405 (1992): 888.4 +-3 .1 +- 1.1 W. Mampe et al., JETP Lett., 57, 82 (1993): 882.6 +- 2.7 J. Byrne et al., Europhys. Lett. 33, 187 (1996): 889.2 +- 3.0 +- 3.8 S. Arzumanov et al., Phys. Lett. B483, 15 (2000): 885.4 +- 0.9 +- 0.4 M.S. Dewey et al., PRL 91, 152302 (2003): 886.8 +- 1.2 +- 3.2 A.Z. Andreev et al., ILL Annual Report, 92-93 (2003): 882 +- 16 A. Serebrov et al., Phys. Lett. B605, 72 (2005): 878.5+-0.7+-0.3 world average

  5. PMT Neutron Lifetime with Magnetically Trapped UCNs • Produce UCN using the “superthermal” process in a trap region • Adiabatic condition, • UCN moves classically in potential. Low-field seeking spin-state is trapped. • Detect decays using scintillation technique Etot = Ekin + m · B < |m| · Btrap Q-pole Trap

  6. Bucking coils Pinch coil Q-pole n Mark II magnet Superconducting Q-pole Magnet • Trap depth=1.1 T (66neV), 4000 UCNs trapped in 1.5 liter volume) • 4-racetrack-shaped quadrupole coils to create a radial field gradient • Two solenoids to close the trap axially

  7. Production of UCN in Superfluid He R. Golub and J.M. Pendlebury, Rep. Progr. Phys., 42 (1979) 439 • 0.89 nm (12 K or 0.95 meV) neutrons can scatter in liquid helium to near rest by emission of a single phonon. • Upscattering (by absorption of a 12 K phonon) ~ Population of 12 K phonons ~ e–12 K/Tbath , Tbath~250mK Phonon Excitations in Liquid Helium

  8. Monochromator (Potassium Intercalated Stage-2 Graphite) 2cm x 5cm x 2mm The individual small monochromator pieces have high purity and mosaics ranging from 1-2 degrees →neutron-inducedbackground reduction and 85% reflectivity

  9. 0.89-nm Beam Performance Incident, transmitted, and reflected beam from the monochromater Reflected beam has l/2 and l/3 peaks filtered from the beam using Pyrolytic graphite and polycrystalline Bi (monochromatic beam: f=5x106ncm-2s-1)

  10. Decay Detection • Superfluid He is used to produce UCNs and to detect decays ! • Recoil electron creates an ionization track in the helium. • Helium ions form excited He2* molecules (ns time scale) in both singlet and triplet states. • He2* singlet molecules decay, producing a large prompt (< 20 ns) emission of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) light. • EUV light (80 nm) converted to blue using the organic TPB.

  11. Prototype Design (Mark II) n

  12. NCNR reactor Beamline n

  13. Neutron Lifetime Data from Mark II (after removing marginally trapped neutrons) Blue: The difference of the trapping and non-trapping data runs (~8 weeks) Green:Marginally trapped neutrons were removed using the field ramping (~2 weeks) Red: Natural helium, no trapped neutron expected

  14. Backgrounds in Mark II Trapping Run Non-trapping Run Difference between Trapping and Non-trapping

  15. Marginally Trapped Neutrons: UCNs in semi-stable orbit • There are neutron trajectories where • Etot = Ekin + m · B > |m| · Btrap • Ramping the field down to 0.3B0 eliminates UCNs on these orbits, but also reduces • the trapped UCNs by 50%.

  16. Vwall UCN → Neutron Wall Interaction Even when the neutrons interact with the wall, they have a non-zero probability for reflection. V(He) = 20 neV Vwall(TPB) = 42 neV Vwall(c) = 180 neV Vwall(PTFE) = 123 neV Ef/Ei=(bf/bi)2/3 ≈ 0.44 Vwall(TPB) – V(He) ≈ 22 neV Kinetic energy at the trap edge (r=R): Eafter = Ef-bfR = 0.44 Ei – 0.3 ETrap ≈ 0.14ETrap 1 T deep trap -> Eafter ≈ 10 neV 3 T deep trap -> Eafter ≈ 30 neV > 22 neV

  17. Toward Improving the Precision – Lager and Deeper magnet; KEK Q-pole • Mark II Mark III • (tn=844+53/-47 s) (x20 more neutrons @ NIST) • fMagnet= 10.5 cmfMagnet = 14 cm fTrap= 8.4 cmfTrap = 12 cm • L = 35 cm LTrap = 75 cm • BTrap= 1.1 T BTrap= 3.1 T

  18. HTS Leads Test • Maximum test current: • 3410 A • LHe comsumption: • 48 l/day (1.45 W) • Vapor-cooled leads: • 260 l/day (8 W) • LN2 consumption: • 150 l/day • Change to double wall • transfer tube can cut • this consumption • below 100 l/day

  19. Magnet Tests Q-pole: tested up to 3000 A (3.7 T) Solenoids: tested up to 250 A (4.0T) Assembly of Q-pole and Solenoids: Q: 90% of design current w/o quench S: 95% of design current w/o quench Q+S: quenching at 80% (1st) and at 90% (2nd) of design currents

  20. Dewar Assembled Magnet HTS current leads

  21. New Cryostat 1.6 m Solenoid Sideview (left tower) Sideview (right tower) KEK Q-pole Magnet Supporting Post

  22. 1 mm thick G-10 wall Al shrinking Fitting flanges Magnet Supporting Posts • Support 1000 kg of weight at 4K • Heat load to 4K, < 0.5W

  23. Summary • Mark I and II demonstrated that measurement of the neutron lifetime with magnetically trapped UCNs from superthermal process appears feasible. • Deeper trap will increase trapped numbers (x20) and help to remove marginally bottled neutrons after the magnet ramping • Lower backgrounds: include a gamma shield in cryostat design and reduce acrylic mass • Mark III upgrade will improve accuracy to dt/t~±3 (s) in 2 years at NIST (06-07). • Then, we will move the experiment to the SNS 0.89-nm beamline to make 0.1% measurement.

  24. Systematic Effects • Phonon up-scattering – negligible @150mK • Spin flip inside the trap - no zero magnetic field • - in non-adiabatic condition • 3He impurity – Mark II: < 10-13 (measured) <1s shift in neutron lifetime • Marginally trapped neutrons • Backgrounds

  25. Previous Experiments Material Walled Bottle Beam

  26. Backgrounds Background source Technique Proposed Improvements over Mark II Gammas high Z shielding 4p coverage reduce acrylic mass low background facilities Fast/epithermal Moderator/ 4p coverage neutrons absorber reduce acrylic mass low background facilities Cosmic rays vetoing better coverage Natural material selection radioactivity Neutron-induced material selection acrylic beamstop radioactivity monochromater external UCN production Neutron-induced material selection acrylic beamstop luminescence shielding better detection efficiency coincidence monochromator external UCN production Produce light even after beam off

  27. Phonon Upscattering • Dominant process is two-phonon • upscattering; single phonon • process suppressed by • a Boltzman factor e-12K/T • Two phonon process scales • with temperature as; • 1/t2-phonon ≈ 10-2T7 • To achieve an upscattering • lifetime of 10-5tn requires • T < 150 mK T7 Data

More Related