200 likes | 295 Views
AST 112. Stellar Structure I. Our Star. The Sun is the STAR at the center of the Solar System. What is the difference between a star and a planet?. Stars vs. Planets. Stars have enough gravity to initiate and sustain nuclear fusion reactions at their cores Planets do not
E N D
AST 112 Stellar Structure I
Our Star • The Sun is the STAR at the center of the Solar System
What is the difference between a star and a planet? Stars vs. Planets
Stars have enough gravity to initiate and sustain nuclear fusion reactions at their cores • Planets do not • Cores of planets are hot, but are not producing nuclear reactions Stars Vs. Planets
The Sun (and all the other stars) spend their lifetimes fusing H into He Depletion of H signals the beginning of the end of a star’s life The initial amount of H and the rate at which the star fuses H into He determine a star’s lifetime Stars Don’t Last Forever
Composition of the Sun What is the Sun made of and why?
Composition of the Sun Mostly H, some He, and a small amountof heavier elements (nitrogen, oxygen,iron, etc.)
Yellow Main Sequence Star • Diameter: 864,000 miles (109DEarth) • Mass: 330,000 MEarth • Density: (water is 1000 kg/m3) • Surface: 5.0 x 10-6 kg/m3 • Core: 162,200 kg/m3 • The surface is 10,000 oF • Lifespan: 10 billion years The Sun
Blue Main Sequence Star Diameter: 1,480,000 miles (1.77 DSun) Mass: 2.02 MSun Luminosity: 25.4 LSun The surface is 17,500 oF Lifespan: 1 billion years Sirius (FAKE PICTURE)
Red Supergiant • Diameter: 1,000,000,000 miles (1180 DSun) • Mass: 19 MSun • Density: (water is 1000 kg/m3) • Surface: 1/100000 that of air at sea level on Earth • Luminosity: 140,000 LSun • The surface is 5840 oF • 100,000,000 years old and maybe on its way out Betelgeuse
Plasma • PLASMA is the phase of matter in a star • Tenuous (gas-like) at outer surface, much more dense toward core • The high temperatures do not allow electrons to stay bound to nuclei
Ancients believed that the Sun was a type of fire Wood burning, coal burning, and other chemical processes insufficient to generate the Sun’s energy (Not) Why Stars Shine
Late 1800’s, an incorrect idea: • The Sun slowly contracts gravitationally, generating large amounts of thermal energy • Recall conservation of energy • Potential energy Thermal energy • Calculations gave 25 million years worth of shining • Fossils and rocks on Earth were known to be way more than 25 million years old (Not) Why Stars Shine
Nuclear reactions convert H to He. Some of the mass is lost to pure energy: E = mc2 Why Stars Shine
When H fuses into He: • Two smaller nuclei mash into one larger one • The larger one weighs less than the sum of the two smaller ones • The mass deficit is converted to energy Why Stars Shine
Nuclei have + charge • Should repel, right? • The Coulomb force does cause them to repel, but: • At extremely short distances, nuclear strong force takes over and binds nucleons together • High pressure and high temperature are required Strong vs. Coulomb
Isn’t there a “contradiction” going on in a star? • Doesn’t gravity still try to collapse the star? • Don’t the nuclear reactions try to blow it apart? Hydrostatic Equilibrium
Hydrostatic Equilibrium • They balance! • Gravity pulls matter inward • Pressure from hotter layers and nuclear reactions pushes matter outward
Hydrostatic Equilibrium • A stack of acrobats: • Bottom one is pressed the hardest, and pushes the hardest • Middle one presses less, is pushed less • Top one isn’t pressed from above, doesn’t push
Hydrostatic equilibrium keeps the Sun’s size stable What happens when the Sun has fused all of its hydrogen into helium? Hydrostatic Equilibrium