1 / 41

Study of Thermal and Optical Characteristics of Selected Optical Detectors

Study of Thermal and Optical Characteristics of Selected Optical Detectors. H. P. Lamichhane and A. G. U. Perera Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 12/08/05. Photovoltaic Effect. Noise in Semiconductor Detectors 1. Johnson Noise

derron
Download Presentation

Study of Thermal and Optical Characteristics of Selected Optical Detectors

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Study of Thermal and Optical Characteristics of Selected Optical Detectors H. P. Lamichhane and A. G. U. Perera Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 12/08/05

  2. Photovoltaic Effect

  3. Noise in Semiconductor Detectors 1. Johnson Noise 2. g-r noise found in photoconductors 3. Shot noise found in photodiodes 4. 1/f noise

  4. Johnson Noise PN = k T B VN = (4 k T R B)1/2 And IN = (4 k T B / R)1/2

  5. Spectral Response

  6. Figure 1.

  7. Figure 2

  8. Figure 3 The noise measurement of the sample 79 is shown figure 4.

  9. a Figure 4. a. Noise current in sample 79 at 30 K. b. Noise current in sample 79 at 03 K. in the active region. c. Noise current in sample 79 at 20 K. in the active region.

  10. b Figure 4. a. Noise current in sample 79 at 30 K. b. Noise current in sample 79 at 03 K. in the active region. c. Noise current in sample 79 at 20 K. in the active region.

  11. c Figure 4. a. Noise current in sample 79 at 30 K. b. Noise current in sample 79 at 30 K. in the active region. c. Noise current in sample 79 at 20 K. in the active region.

  12. Figure 5 Figure 5 shows the Arrhenious calculation of the sample V0262.

  13. Figure 6 Figure 6 and Figure 7a show activation energy calculation of the same sample.

  14. b. a. Figure 7 a. Activation energy of the sample V0262 F, b. Corresponding threshold wavelength of the same sample.

  15. Figure 8. Figure 8 shows the responsivity of the sample 476.

  16. Conclusion Though optical detectors are faster, we need to improve the responsivity of the detector to detect small signals from biomolecules.

  17. Thank You

More Related