1 / 8

2014 Supreme Court Preview

2014 Supreme Court Preview. Susan McHugh, Esq Social Studies/Debate Denver East High School Susan_McHugh@dpsk12.org. Agenda. Supreme Court Fun Facts Previous Term Round Up Using This Term in Your Class Fernandez v. California Using This Term in Your Class Town of Greece v. Galloway

desma
Download Presentation

2014 Supreme Court Preview

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2014 Supreme Court Preview Susan McHugh, Esq Social Studies/Debate Denver East High School Susan_McHugh@dpsk12.org

  2. Agenda • Supreme Court Fun Facts • Previous Term Round Up • Using This Term in Your Class • Fernandez v. California • Using This Term in Your Class • Town of Greece v. Galloway • Classroom Materials

  3. Current Court

  4. Supreme Court 2012-2013 • Number of Merit Opinions? • Number from State Courts? • Number from US Court of Appeals? • Which circuit had the highest #? • http://www.scotusblog.com/2013/06/final-october-term-2012-stat-pack • Which 2 Justices had the highest agreement rate? • Which 2 Justices had the lowest agreement rate? • Of the merit opinions, how many were 9-0? • Of the merit opinions, how many were 5-4? • Ofthe 5-4 decisions, which justice was in the majority the most? • Who authored the most opinions (total)? • Who authored the most 9-0 decisions? • Which majority opinion author had the fewest # of days between argument and opinion? • Which Justice had the highest # of average questions? • Which Justice had the highest frequency as the first questioner?

  5. Last Year’s Cases • Fisher v. University of Texas • 7-1 decision (Justice Kagan recused) with no decision on UT admissions program but sent case back to the 5th Circuit with clarified standard of review emphasizing that race can be used as a factor in university admissions, as long as the use of race is “narrowly tailored” to achieve a compelling interest. • 5th Circuit heard oral arguments on November 13, 2013. All appellate briefs are available at: http://www.utexas.edu/vp/irla/Fisher-V-Texas.html • Florida v. Jardines • 5-4 decision that the use of a drug-sniffing dog on the porch of a home without a properly executed warrant is an unreasonable search violating the 4th Amendment.

  6. This Term: Fernandez v. California 4th Amend - Consent to Search Facts: F suspected of stabbing during gang robbery. Police went to apartment without warrant and hear screams. Police knock and live-in girlfriend opened door holding a child and bloody/ fresh bruises. F was visible to officers at door and said “Get out. I know my rights. You can’t come in.” Police arrested F for domestic violence and took him into custody. One hour later police returned to apartment and girlfriend consented to search. Police found evidence that was used to convict F of gang robbery. Issue: Is consent to search valid from co-tenant when the potential defendant previously stated that he did not consent? Two Major Precedents: United States v. Matlock (1974) 6-3 opinion: Anyone who has “common authority” (mutual use) over a home can consent to a police search of the home in the absence of the other co-tenant. Rationale = when you choose to live with someone and share space, you assume the risk that he/she might consent to a search in your absence. Georgia v. Randolph (2006) 5-3 opinion (Souter): If a potential defendant with self-interest in objecting is at the door of the home and objects, then the co-tenant’s consent to search does not suffice for a reasonable search. Rationale = In customary social actions if two people share a home and at the door one invites you in while the other refuses, then you would not enter.

  7. Town of Greece v Galloway1st Amend: Establishment Clause Facts: Starting in 1999 Town of Greece opened town board meetings with a prayer delivered over public address. Prayer-leaders often asked audience to participate by bowing heads, standing or joining prayer. From 1999 – 2007 all prayer leaders were Christian. Between 2007-2010 there were four prayers delivered by non-Christians. Majority (2/3rds) of prayers between 1999-2010 used Christian language like “Jesus”, “Christ”, “Holy Spirit”. Substance of town meetings after prayer included general town business, public forums and applications for various permits. Issue: Did the Town of Greece’s practice of opening board meetings with a prayer violate the establishment clause of the 1st Amendment? Background presentation: http://www.oyez.org/town-of-greece/ Tests: Marsh v. Chambers (1983):Marsh Test. In light of history, no violation if prayer does not proselytize, disparage, or advance one faith over another. Lynch v. Donnelly (1984): Endorsement Test. No violation unless prayer creates perception to reasonable observer that the government is endorsing or disapproving of religion. Lee v. Weisman: (1992) Coerion Test. No violation unless government 1 )provides direct aid to establish a state church, or 2) coerces people to support/participate in religion against their will.

  8. Classroom Materials • www.streetlaw.org/en/home • www.streetlaw.org/en/topics/us_supreme_court • www.landmarkcases.org • www.oyez.org • www.scotusblog.com • www.constitutioncenter.org • http://www.streetlaw.org/en/programs/Program/10/Supreme_Court_Summer_Institute_for_Teachers

More Related