1 / 32

Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton

Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton. Raj Yabaji, Kevin Bronson, Cary Green, Eduardo Segarra, and Adi Malapati. Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn, and Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX. Introduction.

devaki
Download Presentation

Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spectral Reflectance-based Nitrogen Management for Subsurface Drip Irrigated Cotton Raj Yabaji, Kevin Bronson, Cary Green, Eduardo Segarra, and Adi Malapati Texas A & M Univ. – Texas Agric. Exp. Stn, and Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX

  2. Introduction • The Southern High Plains of Texas average 3000-4000 ft in elevation, 18 in. rainfall/yr and 80 in. open pan evaporation/yr. • The densest concentration of cotton production in the world is here. 3 to 4 million ac of cotton are planted each yr. Cotton is mono-cropped. • Half of the cotton acreage is dryland, half is irrigated from the declining Ogallala aquifer. % 70 of the irrigation is center pivot, 25 % is furrow-irrigated, & 5 % is subsurface drip.

  3. In-season sensing of N status for Cotton

  4. Nitrogen management for subsurface drip irrigated cotton

  5. Objectives • Test spectral reflectance as an N management guide for SDI cotton • Refine the window of N fertilizer injection in SDI cotton • Compare 32-0-0 with 28-0-05S as N fertilizer sources in SDI cotton • Measure denitrification in SDI cotton as affected by N management

  6. Materials & Methods

  7. Plot plan 8, 40-in rows 600 ft

  8. Treatments • 32-0-0 or 28-0-0 5S injected early bloom to mid bloom (5 weeks) • 32-0-0 or 28-0-0 5S injected early bloom to peak bloom (8 weeks) • Zero-N (1 plot/station/rep) • Reflectance-based mgt: 0.5 X N early to peak bloom, N injection rate adjusted upwards by 100 % when • GVI (Green vegetative index)reflectance/GVI soil test < 0.95 or statistical significance. • Amount of N fertilizer = 150 lb N/ac (for 2.5 bale/ac) – 0-24 in soil test NO3-N – irrigation water NO3

  9. Nitrogen requirements for high-yielding cotton 1Nitrogen fertilizer plus 0-24 inch NO3-N

  10. Passive sensor (natural light) 16 wavebands (up & down) 48 inches above canopy Within 2 hrs solar noon Percent reflectance = Refltd irrad @ λ / Incoming irrad @ λ Cropscan MSR 16

  11. Vegetative indices(Bausch and Duke, 1996) • Green vegetative index = R820/R550 • Red vegetative index = R820/R650 R = percent reflectance at λ (nm)

  12. Results

  13. Green vegetative index for SDI cotton Lubbock, 2005 * *

  14. Green vegetative index for SDI cotton Lubbock, 2006 * * * *

  15. Nitrogen fertilizer injections Lubbock, 2005

  16. Nitrogen fertilizer injections Lubbock, 2006

  17. Spring soil nitrate, N fertilizer amounts injected, well water nitrate, and total N supply, Lubbock, TX, 2005

  18. Spring soil nitrate, N fertilizer amounts injected, well water nitrate, and total N supply, Lubbock, TX, 2006

  19. Correlations of Green vegetative index (GVI), chlorophyll meter (SPAD) readings, leaf N, biomass and lint yield, SDI cotton Lubbock 2005-6

  20. Correlations with chlorophyll meter (SPAD) and spectral reflectance at early bloom Lamesa, 2003 Means: Biomass – 704 kg/ha, Leaf N – 3.9%, NDVI_cropscn – 0.43, NDVI_grnskr – 0.52

  21. Correlations with chlorophyll meter (SPAD) and spectral reflectance at early bloom Lamesa, 2004 Leaf N SPAD NDVI_cropscan NDVI_green skr 550nm 0.21 Biomass 0.30 0.34 - 0.29 Leaf N 0.53 0.52 0.43 -0.32 SPAD - 0.30 NDVI_crops 0.47 - 0.31 NDVI_grnsk Cropscn_550 Means: Biomass – 1954 kg/ha, Leaf N – 3.7%, NDVI_cropscn – 0.73, NDVI_grnskr – 0.86

  22. Mid-bloom biomass, green vegetative index, chlorophyll meter readings as affected by N management, Lubbock, TX, 2005

  23. Mid-bloom biomass, green vegetative index, chlorophyll meter readings as affected by N management, Lubbock, TX, 2006

  24. First open boll biomass, N uptake, seed and lint yields as affected by N management, Lubbock, TX, 2005

  25. First open boll biomass, N uptake, seed and lint yields as affected by N management, Lubbock, TX, 2006

  26. Recovery efficiency of 90 lb fertilizer-N/ac in cotton plants

  27. Summary • Green vegetative index related to leaf N and biomass, and responded to N fertilizer treatments. GVI reflected net N mineralization in zero-N plot. • We tested spectral reflectance-based N management, i.e. initial N injections of ½ X of soil test recommendations, and adjusting upwards as GVI falls significantly below soil test management for 2 ½ bale/ac yield goal. • Spectral-reflectance N injection saved 28 and 15 % N compared to soil test-based management for 2005 and 2006, respectively.

  28. Summary cont. • Recovery efficiency of N fertilizer injected daily in subsurface drip irrigated cotton is high, i.e. 62-75 % • Denitrification from N fertilizer injections in SDI cotton was not detectable.

More Related