1 / 20

Bulk Filling Branes and gravity backreaction to Baryon Density

Bulk Filling Branes and gravity backreaction to Baryon Density. Sang-Jin Sin (Hanyang Univ.) 2007.8.23 @Cambridge Based on Archive: 0707.2719. Motive: Phase diagram of Baryon density. Nf/Nc ~ 1 in QCD.

devin-rodriquez
Download Presentation

Bulk Filling Branes and gravity backreaction to Baryon Density

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Bulk Filling Branes and gravity backreaction to Baryon Density Sang-Jin Sin (Hanyang Univ.) 2007.8.23 @Cambridge Based on Archive: 0707.2719

  2. Motive: Phase diagram of Baryon density • Nf/Nc ~ 1 in QCD. • Since Nc has to be large for AdS/CFT, so is the N_f. Then gravity back reaction is not an option but an essential. • The probe approximation gives typical phase diagram that is openwhile QCD phase diagram is closed. (Kim,Lee,Nam,Park,Sin:0706.2525 ) • back reaction closes phase diagram.

  3. Plan of the talk • Baryon chemical potential and charge • AdS charged black hole and R-charge • Bulk Filling Branes and AdS black hole Phase diagram closes • Minkowski v.s Black hole Embeddings (Baryon v.s Quark phase)

  4. Baryon chemical potential • Baryon is not adjoint Rep. • So it is not an Bulk Field. • Chemical potential in 4d is a tail of A_0 • Suggested to be tail of BRANE-FIELD A_0by Kim-Sin-Zahed (hep-th/0608046)vector domination determines A_0=mu*psi_v • Horigome-Tanii (hep-th/0608198)Use eq. of Motion for A_0 without source • Nakamura, Seo, Sin, Yogendran:( • with source

  5. Bottom Up Approach • How to understand from Top down? • Consider AdS5 filled with probe branes that fills the whole Space • Truncate DBI to quadratic F^2 • if m_q=0, Induced metric => Bulk metric • If m_q is not 0, there is deformation Boundary Bulk filling Brane ADS5 bulk Horizon

  6. How baryon charge appear? • It is a brane U(1) charge • Hoever, Brane is filling entire AdS 5 • Hence it is a bulk charge as well. • There is a Unique way a U(1) charge can couple to the metric. • Therefore U(1)_B charge must be related to the charge parameter in RN black hole.

  7. AdS charged black hole Chamblin et.al hep-th/9902170: Q identified as R charge Bulk field A sourced by Adjoint representation What if Bulk=Brane?

  8. Back reaction of metric • Q=given baryon charge, q=parameter of RN BH • What is relation of q & Q? • ANS:

  9. Remark • The only information I used from the Brane language is the relation • NcNf is common to all Dp. • 1/4pi^2 is for D7.

  10. Thermodynamics without Hard Wall • Fixed chemical potential (grand canonical) • Fixed charge (Canonical) : add a surface term = or Legendre transform • Equivalent physics // grand canonical

  11. Phase transitions without/with back reaction • Introducing hard wallHawking-Page Transition (Herzog) • High temperature: charged ads BH • Low temperature: many different candidate: AdS, extremal charged BH, AdS with charges at the wall • We choose the last one for fixed charge case • Treat the grand canonical as Legendre Tr.

  12. Phase diagram (fixed density) • With back reaction v.s Without Main change is attributed to the def. change of T.

  13. Phase diagram: chemical potential Z. Fodor, S.D. Katz (hep-lat/0106002)

  14. Temperature along the phase boundary

  15. conclusion 1. We seem to have phase diagram that mimic that of QCD. 2. We seems to have correct formalism to include the baryon density in bottom up approach. 3. How mass and chiral condensation, coupling etc. are running in density? UNDER PROgress.

  16. Brane Embeddings D3/D7 temperature ads Black hole Black hole embedding v.s Minkoswki brane

  17. Some Issue in D3/D7 with baryon charge • Can there be a Minkowski Embedding? Kobayashi + et.al: (hep-th/0611099) claimed that there is no ME. • If we introduce only quarks: Yes. But If we introduce the baryon source, we may have ME. (S. Nakamura, Seo, Sin, Yogendran)

  18. Quark Phase (D3/D7) • String is connecting D7 and horizon  • D7 brane deformation with spiky structure. D7 Spiky D7  string quark BH Black hole Embedding with charge

  19. Baryon Phase of D3/D7 • String is connecting D7 and baryon vertex • D7 brane deformation without spiky structure. • = ME brane Baryon vertex BH Minkowsky Embedding with charge

  20. Conclusion II • Minkowski brane can exist even in the presence of charge. (Baryon vertex can be in contact with probe brane.)

More Related