Tom Fawcett PhD, C Psychol School of Health, Sport Rehabilitation Sciences

1. Tom Fawcett � PhD, C Psychol School of Health, Sport & Rehabilitation Sciences

3. L5 ASS �Psychology of Sport & Exercise 2 part assessment Group project ( Poster 60% PA mark) Individual Viva ( 40 % mark) L5 ASS �Psychology of Sports Injury & Rehabilitation 2 part assessment Group project ( Poster 60% PA mark) Individual Viva ( 40 % mark) L6 ASS �Mental Training 2 part assessment Group project ( Data Portfolio 35% PA mark) Individual Report ( 65 % mark)

4. The Effects Of Music Tempo On Exercise Intensity

5. The Identification of individual differences regarding achieving the associate phase of learning on the Batak Lite.

6. Strengths of PA Students receive adjusted mark based on individual contribution to collective submission (a,b) Social Loafing reduced but not eliminated (b) Broader range of marks allocated which reflects academic input and quality of work (a,b) Motivation for students to work hard and benefit from personal responsibility / academic effort (b) Internal policing of group contribution (b) Can include Attendance as criteria marking point (a,b) Accepted by student cohort as very useful (a,b) a = external examiner comments b = student evaluation comments

7. Limitations of PA Social Loafing reduced but not eliminated (b) Low contributors require monitoring early on � attendance sheet is required Illness and prolonged absence requires plan B (a) 4. Time consuming compared to traditional assessment Briefing sessions required ( process/ procedure) Formal PA assessment required ( exam week) (a) Irregular PA = follow up session and re � assessment ( potential appeal issue) (b) Collusion of students to gain average mark ( personality dominance) ( b) 9. Low scoring students in PA report it unfair within Student Evaluation & Appeals happen! a = external examiner comments b = student evaluation comments

8. PEER ASSESSMENT FOR GROUP PROJECT L2 -APPLIED SPORTS SCIENCE SEMESTER 1 2009 -10 � PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR OWN SELF ASSESSED MARK IN EACH CATEGORY� CRITIERIA POINT � MARKING SCALE ON EACH ASSESSMENT FACTOR OF GROUP PERFORMANCE 20% each category � 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NO POOR MODERATE- GOOD - VERY EXCELLENT INPUT GOOD INPUT AT ALL Mark out of 10 on each Factor 1 Attendance @ at Lectures/ Practical sessions- data collection �quality input � not just presence!( see attendance sheet for formal lectures) 2. � Generation of material for project (background work- literature review ) Attendance @Group Meetings/ 3. � Contribution to statistical analysis / qualitative analysis of data / tabulation / charts material 4� � Project write up Individual contribution ,work drafts - edits / final presentation proof reading / referencing Contribution to final write up of poster assessment � attendance at final sessions to construct poster for submission ( editing, copying, printing etc) 5 Assessment as an effective team member who fully contributed to the group project (consistency of effort, supportive, non confrontational, motivating and task focused in achieving a high mark for the group portfolio). � � TOTAL MARK =

9. Peer Assessment Profile

10. x 36 34 15 26 x 30 12 30 38 x 16 32 40 34 x T = 88 114 98 43 Total values = 343 / 4 = 85.75( mean) I W = 1.02 1.32 1.14 .5 Based on a Group project Mark of 65% 66.5 % 86% 74 % 32.5%

11. Recommendations